Very cool pro white russian website

Charles Martel

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Messages
8,484
Thanks - great website!

Interesting quote from the site:

What Trotsky was preparing for the Russians for the implementation of "Communism":

"We should turn Her (Russia) into a desert populated with white ni***ers. We will impose upon them such a tyranny that was never dreamt by the most hideous despots of the East. The peculiar trait of that tyranny is that it will be enacted from the left rather than the right and it will be red rather than white in color.

Its color will be red literally because we would spill such torrents of blood that they will pale all human losses of the capitalist wars and make the survivors shudder.

The largest overseas banks will cooperate with us most closely. If we win the Revolution and squash Russia, on the funeral pyres of its remains we will strengthen the power of Zionism and become a power the whole world would drop in the face of on its knees. We will show the world what real power means.

By way of terror and blood baths we will bring the Russian intelligentsia into a state of total stupor, to idiocy, to the animal state of being. So far our young men dressed in leather â€" the sons of watch repair men from Odessa and Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitza â€" oh, how beautifully, how brilliantly do they master hatred of everything Russian! With what a great delight do they physically destroy the Russian intelligentsia â€" officers, generals, engineers, academicians, agronomists, teachers, priests, writers!"

THUS SPAKE TROTSKY

If the Jewish Supremacist Trotsky had become the leader in the 1920s and 1930s, he would have eliminated the white Russians.
 

Observer

Mentor
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
523
A beautiful website. And also, inspirational. Beautiful people, beautiful culture.

It is also a good example of the Russian genius for subverting everything that is good in the cause of the nation, with the extreme case during the Communist era of both God and motherhood (and apple pie) being "used" to defend a regime that was officially atheistic and materialistic.

Historic Russia is 99% correct about the right-ordering of society, with legitimate rulers and a legitimate religion. It is not a land where its political leaders are selected by demagogic mob vote, nor where the spiritual leaders spring up at their own whim and invent their own congregations and religion. But it is precisely because the Russians are "almost" correct that gives them both a real strength but also presents real dangers from this one tiny flaw.

It is fitting that Moscow considers herself the "Fourth Rome"; but, this can only blossom into maturity as an anti-Rome because of Russian Orthodoxy's inability to separate itself from the machinations of the state. In many ways, this is the difference between historic Western and Eastern Europe -- the relative autonomy of the Roman Patriarch (the pope) as compared to that of the patriarchs of the East.

The reverse side of this is that as the officially-recognized influence of hierarchically-organized religion has declined (or actively legislated against) in Western Europe, the nation-states have no effective and official "tool" with which to build their nations and hold them coherent -- and so the hodge-podge of belief systems soon degrades into a hodge-podge of peoples and cultures that are antithetical to one another.

I pray for the day that Russia re-vitalizes the disintegrating political and social structures of Western Europe -- but this can only be possible after Russia gives a more-than-lip-service recognition that the religion they profess transcends the will of whoever is their current poltical leader. And the only way that this can occur is for the Russian patriarch to force his autonomy from the state. In other words, he must follow the Roman model. But he cannot do so by appealing to himself or to precedent, because neither provide these rights. The only mechanism is that the Russian church actually asserts its ties to not only now-defunct Constantinople, but to Rome; which are already there -- but that these ties and obligations are stronger than that imposed by the leader of the Russian state.
 

jcolec02

Mentor
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
886
Location
Tennessee
I am liking what I have seen so far. Pride in their history, technological achievements, their physical beauty as well as there athletic prowess. The Russian military also is featured and it appears to be a very pro christian and white site. Glad I could share with you guys.
 

Rebajlo

Mentor
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,521
Location
N.S.W. - Australia
lost said:
Being pro white in Eastern Europe and Russia isn'tthe great "SIN"thatitisin the west...

Given the anathematisation of pro-Whites in the West, that may be true but while I cannot speak for the rest of eastern Europe I can tell You that Poland is crawling with "anti-racist" organisations - andI'll give You one guess at which ethno-religious group constitutes their primary catalyst...

One seemingly cannot say a word without being accused of "anti-Semitism", "racism" and "homophobia"...
 

Observer

Mentor
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
523
Not to put a damper on the subject, but to instead lend a bit of perspective to what is claimed to be one big happy family that is both benevolent and unconquerable:

"the countries of the former Soviet Union maintain the highest rate of abortions in the world. In 2001, 1,320,000 children were born in Russia, while 1,800,000 abortions were performed...The abortion rate in the USSR peaked in 1964, when 5.6 million abortions were performed"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Russia
 

Observer

Mentor
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
523
Another proud European people...

HUNGARIAN CONSTITUTION (draft)

National Avowal of Faith

At the dawn of a new millennium, we MEMBERS OF THE HUNGARIAN NATION declare the following, with a bond of duty to all Hungarians:

We are proud that one thousand years ago our king, Saint Stephen, based the Hungarian State on solid foundations, and made our country a part of Christian Europe.

We are proud of our ancestors, who fought for the survival, freedom and independence of our country. We are proud of the outstanding intellectual achievements of the Hungarian people.

We are proud that this people fought in defence of Europe for many centuries and, through its talent and diligence, has contributed to the enrichment of the common European heritage.

We acknowledge the role Christianity has played in preserving our nation. We respect all our country's religious traditions.

We promise to preserve the intellectual and spiritual unity of our nation, torn apart by the storms of the past century. We consider the nationalities and ethnic groups living in Hungary to be constituent parts of the Hungarian nation.

We pledge to cherish and preserve our heritage: the Hungarian culture, our unique language, and the man-made and natural riches of the Carpathian Basin...

http://tasz.hu/files/tasz/imce/alternative_translation_of_the_draft_constituion.pdfEdited by: Observer
 

Alpha Male

Mentor
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
775
Location
California
Great website, thanks for sharing.

I found this excerpt informative:

In her exceptionally interesting article The New Soviet Union: America and the West, the author Linda Kimball wrote:


"Behind radical feminism, same-sex marriage, the androgyny theme, gay pride, and the overall pattern of degeneration at all levels of society throughout America and the West lies a revamped international Communist revolution. Being anti-Stalinist it shuns the Communist label and instead disguises itself as Multiculturalism and Political Correctness."

"Separation of church and state, pornography, easy divorce, open borders, extreme sex education, abortion, gay pride, same-sex marriage, androgyny, political correctness, speech codes, the wreckage of the traditional family, and hate crime laws â€" all were imported to the Christian West from the pre-Stalinist Soviet Union. We did not recognize it as Communism because we believed Stalin's modified version to be the original communism".

[ . . . ]

"Like falling dominoes, the collapsing family led to the fall of social order, culture, and then the economy, unleashing a tidal wave of crime, corruption, sexual debauchery, and chaos.
When Stalin came to power, he took immediate steps to restore order.
The family and ethics were restored, abortion and divorce made difficult to obtain, and
sodomy, gender-bendering, etc. were re-criminalized.
In taking these steps, Stalin destroyed the Bolshevik's 'revolution,' for which they hate him to this day".


Source:
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/01/23/the-new-soviet-union-america-and-the-west


For the first time in the Russian history legal abortion was allowed by the Destructive Bolsheviks in Russia in 1920.

stalins_care.jpg
After Joseph Stalin succeeded in suppression and liquidation of most of that godless scum â€" the notorious "Lenin's Old Guard" â€" by the mid-1930s, Stalin made abortion in the USSR strictly forbidden (punishable by 2-years' term of imprisonment) by the Soviet Government Decree, dated 27 June 1936.

Soon after the Stalin's death, his "successor," Nikita Khruschev (a disguised Trotskyite) again allowed legal abortion on 23 November 1955.

Stalin re-introduced Christmas Tree in 1936, which had been strictly forbidden by the Bolsheviks immediately after the Revolution in 1917, and the Russian children would again receive Christmas presents from Grandfather Frost (the Russian for Santa Claus).

As is known, it was Stalin who began to revive the Russian Orthodox Church in the mid-1930s, despite the rabid opposition of the "Old Bolsheviks." Stalin's efforts resulted in 1943 in the establishment of the Moscow Patriarchate. During the Great Patriotic War Stalin concluded his daily Stavka (Staff Headquarter) meetings and briefings with his marshals and generals with these words: "So help us God!" and "Go and be victorious with God!"

After Stalin's death, the notorious traitor Nikita Khruschev initiated severe persecutions of the Russian Orthodox Church again, impudently promising that by 1980 there would remain no single Orthodox priest in the USSR.
Edited by: Alpha Male
 
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
201
Alpha - I live in Russia and I'm sick of all the pro-Stalin sentiment here. He was one of the greatest mass murderers in history, in the same vain as Pol-Pot, Hitler and Mao. He killed millions of his own Russian people, and stuff like which you just posted only spurs less-eductated Russians on to beliving that his dictorial and (to put it midly) heavy-handed ways are what is best for the country.

And now we have Putin and the likes, stripping away all democratic freedoms from Russia, and many people are actually happy about it. On the May 9 vidtory parade the other week, people were putting flowers around a portrait of Stalin, and that just depressed me.
 

Alpha Male

Mentor
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
775
Location
California
I am no expert in Russian affairs; I only foundinteresting thedistinction noted between Stalin's Communism and the Bolshevik's. The similarity between Bolshevik Communism and Western multiculturalism (political correctness) is startling. No Christmas tree? Wasn't a menorah recently placed in front of the White House and the Christmas tree removed?

Was Stalin the lesser of two evil...perhaps?

Please share your experiences as I am interested in learning about your country. FYI, I had a Russian Grandma.Edited by: Alpha Male
 

Alpha Male

Mentor
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
775
Location
California
"people were putting flowers around a portrait of Stalin, and that just depressed me. "

It's human nature to want heroes; it's rare to find the individual who internalizes that projection (i.e., recognizes that archetype as an inner power).
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
In many ways Stalin was worse than Hitler towards White people with his government sanction starving of millions/killing of White people in the area of which is now Ukrain, not to mention the pruging(killing) of the Officer Corps and Senior Staff NCOs just prior to WW2. He was a menence to Whites.

In no way should be held up as a hero in any manner.
 
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
201
Alpha - I am glad to share any experiences if you have specific questions. Bear in mind that whilst I live in Russia and have done for all my adult life, I was born and educated in Britain, and so am not a 100% native Russky. However, I consider myself to be culturally much more Russian than British - i.e - Russia is my home (and always will be), and on the odd occassion that I go to Britain I feel life a complete stranger.

Yes - most people desire heroes, and hence the Stalin worship. Despite the impression that site gives, Russia does have a considerable divide in opinions and political pursuasions. However, I would say that a lot of the stuff the site talks about is valid, and does reflect the viewpoint of the majority of Russians.
 

Bart

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
4,329
Westside said:
In many ways Stalin was worse than Hitler towards White people with his government sanction starving of millions/killing of White people in the area of which is now Ukrain, not to mention the pruging(killing) of the Officer Corps and Senior Staff NCOs just prior to WW2. He was a menence to Whites.

In no way should be held up as a hero in any manner.

Bump!
 
Top