vermont secession

Freedom

Mentor
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Messages
812
Location
Tennessee
Many people in the state of Vermont, still a small percentage, want to secede from the union. Quite an ironic twist considering it was a major opponent of Southern Secession and demographically and culturally, hasn't
changed as much as the rest of the country.

From Yahoo:

Vt. secession movement gains traction

By JOHN CURRAN, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 29 minutes ago

MONTPELIER, Vt. - At Riverwalk Records, the all-vinyl music store just down the street from the state Capitol, the black "US Out of Vt.!" T-shirts are among the hottest sellers.
ADVERTISEMENT

But to some people in Vermont, the idea is bigger than a $20 novelty. They want Vermont to secede from the United States â€â€￾ peacefully, of course.

Disillusioned by what they call an empire about to fall, a small cadre of writers and academics hopes to put the question before citizens in March. Eventually, they want to persuade state lawmakers to declare independence, returning Vermont to the status it held from 1777 to 1791.

Neither the state nor the U.S. Constitution explicitly forbids secession, but few people think it is politically viable.

"I always thought the Civil War settled that," said Russell Wheeler, a constitutional law expert at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. If Vermont fought and won a war with the federal government, "then you could say Vermont proved the point. But that's not going to happen."

Still, the idea has found plenty of sympathetic ears in Vermont, a left-leaning state that said yes to civil unions, no to slavery (before any other) and last year elected a socialist to the U.S. Senate.

Supporters have published a "Green Mountain Manifesto" subtitled "Why and How Tiny Vermont Might Help Save America From Itself by Seceding from the Union."

In 2005, about 300 people turned out for a secession convention in the Statehouse, and plans for a second one are in the works. A poll this year by the University of Vermont's Center for Rural Studies found that 13 percent of those surveyed support secession, up from 8 percent a year before.

"The argument for secession is that the U.S. has become an empire that is essentially ungovernable â€â€￾ it's too big, it's too corrupt and it no longer serves the needs of its citizens," said Rob Williams, editor of Vermont Commons, a quarterly newspaper dedicated to secession.

"We have electoral fraud, rampant corporate corruption, a culture of militarism and war," Williams said. "If you care about democracy and self-governance and any kind of representative system, the only constitutional way to preserve what's left of the Republic is to peaceably take apart the empire."

Vermont, which was historically conservative, has evolved into one of the nation's most liberal states since the latter part of the 20th century, a tie-dyed bastion of countercultural dissent and New England self-reliance where folks wear their hearts â€â€￾ and their anti-war stickers â€â€￾ on their Subaru station wagon bumpers.

Secession movements have a long history. Key West, Fla., staged a mock secession from America in the 1980s. In Vermont, the town of Killington tried to break away and join New Hampshire in 2004, and Hawaii, Alaska, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Texas all have some form of secession organizations today.

The Vermont movement has been simmering for years but gained new traction because of the
Iraq war, rising oil prices and the formation of several pro-secession groups.

Secession supporters hope to have the question considered in March on Town Meeting Day, when voters gather to discuss state and local issues.

Thomas Naylor, 70, a retired Duke University economics professor and author, wrote the manifesto and founded a secession group called Second Vermont Republic.

His 112-page manifesto contains little explanation of how Vermont would make do without federal aid for security, education and social programs. Some in the movement foresee a Vermont with its own currency and passports, for example, and some form of representative government formed once the secession has taken place.

Frank Bryan, a professor at the University of Vermont who has championed the cause for years, said the cachet of secession would make the new republic a magnet.

"People would obviously relish coming to the Republic of Vermont, the Switzerland of North America," he said. "Christ, you couldn't keep them away."

The Middlebury Institute, a Cold Spring, N.Y., think tank, hosted a North American Separatist Convention last fall in Burlington that drew representatives from 16 organizations. The group is co-sponsoring another conference in October in Chattanooga, Tenn.

Of course, skeptics abound.

"It doesn't make economic sense, it doesn't make political sense, it doesn't make historical sense. Other than that, it's a good idea," said Paul Gillies, a lawyer and Vermont historian.

For now, the would-be secessionists are hoping to draw enough support to get the question on Town Meeting Day agendas.

"We're normal human beings," said Williams, 39, a history professor at Champlain College. "But we're serious about this. We want people in Vermont to think about the options going forward. Do you want to stay in an empire that's in deep trouble?"

___

Second Vermont Republic: http://www.vermontrepublic.org/

Middlebury Institute: http://middleburyinstitute.org/

Free Vermont.net: http://www.freevermont.netEdited by: Freedom
 
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
461
Let them go. May be Massachusetts,Maine, Michigan, NY, NH,NJ, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Minn., Iowa Wisconsin, Washington, Oregon, and last but definately not least California will follow them. After that may be the reamining states will read the Constitution and reform a Constitutional Republic. Oh, yeah at this point we may as well throw Florida in to.
 

Solomon Kane

Mentor
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
783
Since it is clear that our rulers have absolutely no sense of constitutional, national, or state integrity, the only solution is secession really--let us--the betrayed American populace--form our own states, restore property rights, and abolish all anti-discrimination laws (i.e. all "civil rights" legislation), and protect to the maximum our new borders.
 

Bronk

Mentor
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Messages
962
Location
Texas
I'm with Soloman Kane. I tend to support most secessionist movements across the globe (including Hawaii and Alaska). Breaking up these big nation-states is a good way of chopping down big government and stumping globalism. I am very much in favor of the USA cutting Puerto Rica loose and taking all the Puerta Ricans with it!
 

Freedom

Mentor
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Messages
812
Location
Tennessee
Tired Old White, you forgot Rhode Island and Connecticut.
smiley1.gif

The Alaskan secession movement is wrong. If they seceded during the Cold War, they'd all be in Soviet gulags and slave labor camps.
Everybody wants to secede until an empire is rising. How about just giving more state control to immigration. Most permanent Vermonters are not like your pro gay New England liberals.They are very private, indifferent, very very tough, and rural. They're a few hippies that stayed there, but most are not. They could care less about most issues that preoccupy the country.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,588
Location
Pennsylvania
I'm with Bronk and Solomon. It will take the individual secession from the System of a large number of the productive people in this country, followed by secession on a local, state and then possibly regional level. Every reason that existed to break away from England also exists today when it comes to breaking the chains with which Washington is trying to enslave us.
 

hedgehog

Mentor
Joined
Apr 16, 2005
Messages
505
Location
Afghanistan
Don Wassall said:
I'm with Bronk and Solomon.  It will take the individual secession from the System of a large number of the productive people in this country, followed by secession on a local, state and then possibly regional level.  Every reason that existed to break away from England also exists today when it comes to breaking the chains with which Washington is trying to enslave us.

I couldnt agree more
 

Solomon Kane

Mentor
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
783
Freedom said:
Would increased sectionalism allow the Southwest to lean more towards Mexico?

That may be the result. It's regrettable--but perhaps necessary. If the vast majority of the Southwest population--due to the waves of immigration---comes to feel a greater kinship with Mexico (or with whatever new Hispanic state is being formed) and wishes to form a new state--a greater Mexico--that may be the price we have to pay.

In effect, give the hispanic immigrant his own nation-state.

The problem is that he will make a mess of it--it will be riddled with corruption, authoritarianism, cronyism, and a stagnant economy. *It will be a flat out failure just like Mexico.* Then the citizens of this failed Latino State will come knocking on the door of the "new" USA (or CONFEDERACY), but then....

they will meet a newly reinvigorated re-unified 90% white confederacy of New States (all of whom have left the old USA precisely to avoid an immigrant invasion).

These shotgun-armed citizens of the new USA are going to look at these prospective immigrants and say "Sorry Jose, your people are not my people...please go back to your side of the border." And, unlike our present government, the new CSA is going support these shotgun armed ranchers and farmers to the hilt. Or that's my dream anyway!

In effect, secessionism and a new confederacy is a way for the white man to re-group, re-unify, recover a normal sense of himself and his tribe.

And after re-grouping and re-unifying we can then contemplate reconquering the Southwest. How's that for a "reconquista"?
 
Top