Two Nigerian Negroes behead a man in London

[Matra2]

Negroes and Mohammedans would be ZERO problem for us if it wasn't for Zhids using them as tools to destroy us.

Wrong. They were both trouble (a lot less for many European nations but trouble nonetheless) long before they became useful tools.

 

[werewolf]

Wrong. They were both trouble (a lot less but many European nations but trouble nonetheless) long before they became useful tools.

Wrong. The USA never had the slightest problem with any Islamic nation since the days of the Barbary pirates...until "our best friend" Israhell came along...and even as recently as 1999 the Moslems were being depicted as "the good guys" in the controlled US media, that is when the almost all Jewish Slick Willy and Hillary regime was engaged in their demented destruction of the peaceful Christian nation of Yugoslavia.

Negroes were amongst the most rapidly advancing groups in the USA and did not have a high crime rate and did not have a high rate of out of wedlock children and welfare etc. - until the Jewish-Communist plan of integration was put into effect.

 

[Matra2]

Wrong. The USA never had the slightest problem with any Islamic nation since the days of the Barbary pirates...until "our best friend" Israhell came along...and even as recently as 1999 the Moslems were being depicted as "the good guys" in the controlled US media, that is when the almost all Jewish Slick Willy and Hillary regime was engaged in their demented destruction of the peaceful Christian nation of Yugoslavia.

Negroes were amongst the most rapidly advancing groups in the USA and did not have a high crime rate and did not have a high rate of out of wedlock children and welfare etc. - until the Jewish-Communist plan of integration was put into effect.

You're right that the USA did not have a Muslim problem until Israel. Europe has had Muslim problems for more than a millennium.

Blacks may have been advancing but there's a reason segregation was brought in in the first place. Don't fall for the paleolibertarian/conservative view that blacks were fine until welfare destroyed their communities and therefore we could all get along as long as we have a laissez faire capitalist state without welfare. Blacks always had much higher levels of violence than whites throughout the unsegregated north and although I agree that things are much worse thanks to Jewish hegemony there was no multicultural paradise on the way. When different ethnic groups, including whites, live in close proximity to one another it never ends well.

 

[werewolf]

You're right that the USA did not have a Muslim problem until Israel. Europe has had Muslim problems for more than a millennium.

Blacks may have been advancing but there's a reason segregation was brought in in the first place. Don't fall for the paleolibertarian/conservative view that blacks were fine until welfare destroyed their communities and therefore we could all get along as long as we have a laissez faire capitalist state without welfare. Blacks always had much higher levels of violence than whites throughout the unsegregated north and although I agree that things are much worse thanks to Jewish hegemony there was no multicultural paradise on the way. When different ethnic groups, including whites, live in close proximity to one another it never ends well.

Europe had White Moslem invasions from north Africa 1,000 years ago - and so did the middle east and Persia - where Islam was victorious - but there were no Moslems - and certainly no Negroes - living in Europe until the immigration invasions were engineered following the white race's loss of the war in 1945.

Blacks did have a much higher rate of crime and drug addiction, etc., prior to integration, but there was little black on non-black crime up until the 1960's, and that's because the law had no tolerance for it and it was very severely punished legally or extra-legally, and the media and the schools hadn't yet started their all out anti-white agenda just yet.

Lincoln wanted to send the blacks back to Africa. He said that they could not live with white people. They deliberately left that part off the inscription on the Lincoln Monument. They even made an entire country in Africa for them to go to, and it's still there waiting.

 

[Charles Martel]

The fact of the matter is the West would be a better place to live without Negros AND Mohammadeans.

And in your opinion, without white Gentiles too Mr. Cohen?

 

[Phall]

All this black/muslim chicken-or-egg grandstanding reminds me of one particular internet treasure:

Attack on the White Nations

Although just slightly less than 100% factually accurate, I would recommend that this cartoon become part of the mandatory curriculum in all public and private schools.

Here's the same video on youtube (it usually gets banned after a few weeks)
[video=youtube;fbR8bFRxoYo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbR8bFRxoYo&bpctr=1369935601[/video]

 

[werewolf]

Great video.

 

[Wes Woodhead]

All this black/muslim chicken-or-egg grandstanding reminds me of one particular internet treasure:

Attack on the White Nations

Although just slightly less than 100% factually accurate, I would recommend that this cartoon become part of the mandatory curriculum in all public and private schools.

Here's the same video on youtube (it usually gets banned after a few weeks)
[video=youtube;fbR8bFRxoYo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbR8bFRxoYo&bpctr=1369935601[/video]

I first saw that video like three years ago, and it NEVER stayed up online for more than a couple weeks. It was always getting deleted for some reason or another. I love how the knuckle walking negro looks around after he kills everybody. Like whos gonna feed me now?

 

[Charles Martel]

From BBC.com

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22743438

Woolwich: Michael Adebolajo charged with Lee Rigby murder

A second man has been charged with the murder of Drummer Lee Rigby in Woolwich, south-east London, on 22 May.

Michael Adebolajo, 28, of Romford, Essex, was also charged with the attempted murder of two police officers and possession of a firearm. He has been remanded in custody to appear in Westminster Magistrates Court on Monday. Michael Adebowale, 22, has already been charged with the soldier's murder and appeared in court on Thursday.

He was charged after spending six days in hospital, having been shot by police and arrested following the attack on 22 May.

Mr Adebolajo, who was also shot and arrested at the scene, was charged after spending nine days in hospital and taken into custody at a south London police station. Both Mr Adebowale and Mr Adebolajo were filmed and photographed by witnesses following the attack, which took place on a busy street during the afternoon.

On Wednesday, a post-mortem examination found Drummer Rigby, from Middleton, Greater Manchester, died of "multiple incised wounds" after the attack. Thousands of flowers have been laid at the scene of the killing by members of the public in honour of Drummer Rigby.

The total number of arrests made in connection with the attack stands at 12. So far, eight of those arrested have been bailed and two released without charge.

 

[Rebajlo]

It didn't.

Similar attacks by Negroes against Whites happen regularly (in the USA, South Africa and elsewhere around the world). I suggest you go through this thread:

http://www.castefootball.us/forums/showthread.php/3621-Crime-Thread

Carcharias -

Much obliged for the suggestion, mate, but I'm more than aware of the Negroes' genetic predisposition for murder so I don't need to re-read a thread to which I've contributed about the same number of posts as You have.

I don't know about You, but unlike many of our members - and I say this without even the slightest intention of giving offence to anyone here - I've been "racially aware" for my entire life. I've lived among Asians, Arabs, Pakis and Negroes both here in Australia (including approximately six months on the boundary of Wiley Park and Lakemba, the most Muslim areas of Sydney) and in England and Wales (ever visited Cardiff..?) so I don't need anyone to "educate" me about non-White crime, particularly that of the Muslim and Negro variety. For fans of Tyson Fury, I can also tell You a thing or two about pikeys (sorry - "Irish Travellers"...).

Islam just gave the sub-Saharan Africans an excuse to kill a white man at that place and time, they would have done something like that anyway.

Right, I get it - that's, er, "perfectly logical"...but...hang on, hang on! If Islam provided them with an excuse, then it stands to reason that it was a catalyst. Pardon the semantics, but there it is. Oh, I forgot - they would have "done something like that" (id est, specifically targeted a British soldier) anyway. How silly of me, for I failed to realise that shouting Islamist bull**** was irrelevant...

And in your opinion, without white Gentiles too Mr. Cohen?

I say, that's a surpassingly witty ad hominem, mate, very witty. Ever thought of calling him Mr. Goldstein? Now, wouldn't that be ****ing funny...

Why are You trying to paint this bloke as some sort of anti-White troll? Is it because he speaks the truth about the "religion" which You seem so oddly keen to defend? Ah, but You cannot get past his username, can You? Perhaps he should change it - maybe even several times. What do You reckon, Parody, er, Dempseyfire, sorry, Carcharias..?

Put it this way: I'll wager Menelik knows a bit more about Muslims than You do. Incidentally, have You ever lived in a heavily Muslim area? Ever been to the UK, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, or Germany in the last, say, decade or two? For that matter, are You aware that if You defended Muslims like BoxingSpecialist2 in a European "pro-White" milieu people wouldn't hesitate to tell You to **** off and all. By the by, do You know that "racially aware" Russians view those Turkic Muslim types that You dedicate panegyric threads to in the boxing section as inferior Asiatic scum? See, Russians actually have to deal with these hairy-nosed Magomeds and Sultans so they consequently know the score - unlike some at Caste Football, it appears...

Are you aware that in the US, there are 7,608 murders per year committed by blacks, the majority of who are Christian? Christian Blacks account for 52% of murders in the US, despite only making up 10% or so of the population.

Further, of the 7,608 murders by mainly Christian blacks, roughly 2,000 are involved with killing a white person. Are you suggesting that Christianity is to blame in these cases Rebajlo? Or what is the cause of these 7,608 yearly murders then?

Id like to ask you Rebajlo, what you think the cause of 7,608 murders per year in the USA by Christian Negroes is?

BoxingSpecialist2 -

Do the non-Muslim US Negroes take pains to inform everyone that they are killing Whites (or anyone else they happen to shoot, stab, hack or kick to a jelly...) in the name of Christianity? No, I didn't think so...

By the way, You again failed to comment on examples I provided of violent, specifically anti-White criminal activity perpetrated or planned by non-Negro Muslims. In time honoured Mohammedan fashion, you employ a hysterical mode of "discussion" based on obstinately transferring the blame to everyone and everything else while conveniently ignoring the striking evidence which instantly explodes your breathlessly-reiterated Muslims-can-do-no-wrong mantra...

Read the following and feel free to tell us what you think:

UK: HINDUS AND SIKHS PROTEST AGAINST VILE "ASIAN" PROPAGANDA BY MEDIA AND AUTHORITY MAKING THEM CULPABLE FOR MUSLIM CRIMES:

http://www.islam-watch.org/authors/...y-making-them-culpable-for-muslim-crimes.html

Europe had White Moslem invasions from north Africa 1,000 years ago - and so did the middle east and Persia - where Islam was victorious - but there were no Moslems - and certainly no Negroes - living in Europe until the immigration invasions were engineered following the white race's loss of the war in 1945.

werewolf - Ever heard of the Crimean Khanate and its slave raids into the Ukraine, Poland, and Russia? How about the Khanate's overlords, the Ottomans? Try telling eastern Europeans, particularly those hailing from the Balkans, that Muslims have been "no trouble" until after 1945 and watch the ugly reaction such a statement shall conjure. As I've said several times before, the only reason Islam hadn't posed a serious threat to the West since the late seventeenth century was due to the latter's crushing military and economic superiority, not the Muslims' "peaceful nature"...

All this black/muslim chicken-or-egg grandstanding reminds me of one particular internet treasure...

Phall -

Don't worry, everyone here is familiar with the role of the Jews (at least I assume that they are...). I'm certainly not engaging in "chicken and egg grand-standing" but as some members of this pro-White forum appear to hold rather indulgent views of Muslims, I cannot sit idly by... :icon_wink:

 

[frederic38]

All this black/muslim chicken-or-egg grandstanding reminds me of one particular internet treasure:

Attack on the White Nations

Although just slightly less than 100% factually accurate, I would recommend that this cartoon become part of the mandatory curriculum in all public and private schools.

Here's the same video on youtube (it usually gets banned after a few weeks)
[video=youtube;fbR8bFRxoYo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbR8bFRxoYo&bpctr=1369935601[/video]

the youtube video is not viewable from france :lipsrsealed:

 

[BoxingSpecialist2]

I say, that's a surpassingly witty ad hominem, mate, very witty. Ever thought of calling him Mr. Goldstein? Now, wouldn't that be ****ing funny...

Why are You trying to paint this bloke as some sort of anti-White troll? Is it because he speaks the truth about the "religion" which You seem so oddly keen to defend? Ah, but You cannot get past his username, can You? Perhaps he should change it - maybe even several times. What do You reckon, Parody, er, Dempseyfire, sorry, Carcharias..?

Carcharias is my favourite and most respected user on this site, he referred me to the site, and he has also referred other users to the site. Through his referral Ive learned a lot and expanded my opinions and perspectives. He really does a lot of good for this website and I am thankful for his referral. That's exactly the type of behaviour (positive referrals) that is needed online and in real life that can help to grow this "pro white" cause.

I was involved in pro-white issues since before coming across Carcharias, but still, I was totally unaware of this site. I am very happy to be at this site posting now, and more than just this site my pro-white opinions extend into real life as well.

It's quite rude for you to be attacking or mocking a longterm member like him. Carcharias has really contributed a lot to this website and deserves more respect than that. He has been here a longtime and is a consistently great poster. It's a shame that on a pro-white site like this, we can't even have a civil conversation.

As for the rest of your comments, I'd rather not get into a long, drawn out argument, and I don't wish to derail the thread, so I will leave it at that! You are entitled to your opinion Rebajlo and I don't think we will ever agree on these issues, so it's probably best to just politely disagree.

 

[Charles Martel]

I foresee the situation starting at about 4:00 of this video becoming a reality.

Attack on the White Nations

[video=youtube;fbR8bFRxoYo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbR8bFRxoYo&bpctr=1369935601[/video]

Poetic justice?

I see little hope for the White race in the years to come. Our bravest and best must have died in the world wars, because most of us are soft and cowardly now. And of course the Jewish Supremacist media has brainwashed the less intelligent among us into self-loathing and self-destructive behavior.

There is a power vacuum which is being filled by East and South Asians here in Canada, as well as in Australia from what I understand. It will take a bit longer in the USA for White people to be rendered completely powerless and replaced by non-White immigrants.

And the Jewish Supremacists, most of whom are White but live with a delusion that they are the "chosen" or superior race, will eventually become the victims of their own anti-White agenda.

Not only to they fail to see the threat to themselves from a Muslim Europe, the Jewish Supremacists greatly underestimate the Chinese, who will eventually displace them as the business elite.

And with the deterioration of law and order in Europe and North America, even the Jewish Supremacists in their wealthy and "safe" neighborhoods will increasingly become the victims of Negro-on-White crime.

Attacks on Jews by Muslims have been increasing in France.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/02/attacks-on-jews-soar-82-in-france.html

The Jewish Supremacists' chickens are starting to come home to roost.

 

[Rebajlo]

Carcharias is my favourite and most respected user on this site, he referred me to the site, and he has also referred other users to the site. Through his referral Ive learned a lot and expanded my opinions and perspectives. He really does a lot of good for this website and I am thankful for his referral. That's exactly the type of behaviour (positive referrals) that is needed online and in real life that can help to grow this "pro white" cause.

I was involved in pro-white issues since before coming across Carcharias, but still, I was totally unaware of this site. I am very happy to be at this site posting now, and more than just this site my pro-white opinions extend into real life as well.

It's quite rude for you to be attacking or mocking a longterm member like him. Carcharias has really contributed a lot to this website and deserves more respect than that. He has been here a longtime and is a consistently great poster. It's a shame that on a pro-white site like this, we can't even have a civil conversation.

BoxingSpecialist2 -

That's all very good, but Carcharias and another member have been "quite rude" to Menelik, implying that he's a Jew (bloody hell, this all sounds so ****ing childish - I feel like I'm back in primary school...:mmph. So, did their name-calling enhance the "civil conversation"? As Menelik hasn't posted anything even remotely anti-White or pro-Jewish, such remarkably perspicacious "inferences" are solely based on the bloke's username (that the name may possibly constitute a form of tongue-in-cheek irony obviously hasn't crossed anyone's mind...) and his continuous criticism of Islam.

Given Carcharias places such apparent emphasis on usernames it wasn't a great leap to draw attention to the undeniable fact that he has rather schizophrenically changed his own moniker several times. On a number of previous occasions Carcharias has referred to our member Sport Historian as Mr. Goldstein (doubtlessly imagining this to be an exhibition of uproarious wit...), so can you now see where I'm coming from..?

As for the rest of your comments, I'd rather not get into a long, drawn out argument, and I don't wish to derail the thread, so I will leave it at that! You are entitled to your opinion Rebajlo and I don't think we will ever agree on these issues, so it's probably best to just politely disagree.

Come now, discussing Islam and Muslim crime does not derail this particular thread, does it...

You appear to have the time and inclination to mention Muslims and Islam at length a propos of nothing just about everywhere else - yet you unfailingly avoid answering "uncomfortable" questions about the subject, instead conveniently choosing the safe option of "polite disagreement"...

You don't want to discuss Muslim crime? That's fine. But if you wish to avoid criticism, don't constantly assail us with your one-sided, pro-Muslim tirades because the more "hard core" pro-White fellows like yours truly shall invariably pose the questions you have no intention of answering... :icon_idea:

 

[werewolf]

BoxingSpecialist2 -

That's all very good, but Carcharias and another member have been "quite rude" to Menelik, ...

Aha, the Megaphone alert goes out and the second Sayanim waddles in to defend his inarticulate "zzz" 'ing landsman. This one loves to pound his fat little fingers on the keyboard, and this one says he abhors rudeness...so, for the edification of the learned audience here, I reproduce here Mr Rebajlowitz' brilliant and polite post from the Closed "Sandy Hoax" thread, addressed to moi:

Are you that unacquainted with the concept of manners? How old are you anyway, for your hysterical comportment would suggest a pimply fourteen of fifteen? Just because someone is not in fanatical agreement with your eternally recycled, "irrefutable" proclamations (which you probably even mumble during your few fitful hours of drooling sleep...) does not give you an automatic license to insult them or accuse them of being Zionists. In fact, your modus operandi is no different from that of the Jews, whose primary weapon of debate is yelling "anti-Semite". In your case, it's "Zio-shill"...

Hang on, what was that noise? Ah, not to worry - it's just the Tooth Fairy popping in her diaphragm so she doesn't get knocked up again by her boyfriend, the Easter Bunny (who's a Mason in addition to being a secret Supernumerary Knight of the Garter and significant shareholder in NewsCorp).

If you look out of your window right this moment (or emerge from the cellar to a level which features an aperture to the outside world) you'll notice the luminous Bat Signal etched against the sable night sky. Of course, any idiot can see that it represents the Sigil of Baphomet (which, incidentally, also adorns Jack Frost's jockstrap - just think about the implications of that for a moment...). Anyway, it was activated by closet homo Commissioner Gordon, who heard rumours about a meeting of the Anti-Justice League (hepatitis B-infected pederasts to a man, each of whom sports a small but highly distinctive purple gannet tattoo on his sinister - for the Classically and heraldically challenged, that means left - buttock) to be held in a St. Vincent de Paul "charity shop" on the outskirts of Gotham City. By the by, Gotham City's mayor siphons off significant sums of ratepayers' money to purchase guns, explosives and, most importantly, Glasgow Celtic jerseys for the Real IRA - which goes some way to explaining the poor state of that city's stormwater drains...

But sorry, I digress. Batman hasn't even noticed the Bat Signal as he is otherwise pleasantly engaged shagging Lois Lane (and using the opportunity to test a couple of Bat-gadgets with plenty of commercial potential) on a custom-made four-poster bed manufactured by a Faroese company covertly financed by MI6. This bed just happens to be located in a hotel owned by Supo. To top things off, there's a KFC outlet three blocks down the road - can't you see the connection?!?! Come on, it's bloody self-explanatory! All you have to do is open your eyes, you ignorant zio-chump-shill with bells on!

But the obvious question to pose at this juncture is "why is Batman porking Superman's sheila?" Now, here's something the media most definitely doesn't want you to know: the so-called Man of Steel is actually a whimpering impotent who hasn't been able to crack a fat without the aid of industrial doses of erectile dysfunction drugs (the costs of which are covered by General Motors and - therefore - the US taxpayer...) since the age of seventeen (insert Stevie Nicks soundtrack here...)

Superman usually has a vast stash of ****-stiffening pills locked away in a booby-trapped warehouse, but his entire supply of triple-strength Erecto-Max (the variant not sold to the public and normally exclusively available to Benedictine monks - but only on feast days...) was stolen by ASIO triple-agent Elmer Fudd, who simply blasted his way in with an oversized shotgun. In case you weren't aware, Fudd uses the same speech pathologist as Chris Eubank. With Superman soft as a newborn's crap and that slapper Lois Lane (as usual) just panting to get off, Batman plunged straight into the breach - but not before hastily applying some free-from-animal-testing makeup to conceal the purple gannet tattoo on his left arse cheek...

As we speak, the now freakishly boned up Fudd is copping a tit wank off Jessica Rabbit, who is employed as a part-time "honey trap" operative by an obscure splinter group of the FLNC! She was once in a menage a cinq with - get this! - Nick Clegg, Johnny "Mad Dog" Adair, "Mean" Gene Okerlund, and Prince Albert of Monaco (the latter's active participation was hampered by the effects of a "bobsledding mishap", which was in truth an assassination attempt ordered by Herman Van Rompuy's dentist). Mind you, I didn't just google it up, mate. No, this is all true, as I heard it directly from Meat Loaf's cousin, who was right there at the scene of that Red Bull-fuelled five-way debauch, which took place in an abandoned abbatoir fifteen miles and three yards north-northwest of Tadcaster. He filmed the whole thing (perforce holding the camcorder in his non-dominant hand). The footage is shaky but clear. This episode plainly throws an entire new light upon the price of cashews, doesn't it..?

By the way, that fellow across the road who is staking out the seedy dump you call home - you know, the geezer in the trench coat and fedora hat - is a Mossad spook. But don't be alarmed, as he's only waiting for the right moment to break the news that your real father is a Jewish sperm donor who, notwithstanding his rabid Zionism, was expelled from Gush Emunim on account of his "unhealthy" obsession with Negro boxers and their "steel wool" hair...

http://www.castefootball.us/forums/...̶e̶-̶o̶f̶-̶D̶e̶n̶m̶a̶r̶k̶-Sandy-Hook!!!/page9

The foaming at the mouth zio's last bit, ""unhealthy" obsession with Negro boxers and their "steel wool" hair", refers to my round by round analysis of the Lewis-Vitali fight which Lewis "won" by first raking his glove laces across Vitali's face and then spending the rest of the fight rubbing his steel wool hair into the cut that was opened by the laces. He should have been disqualified.

And so should these two trojan horses here, Rebajloberg and Menelik The Black Jewish Prince. Rebajlo must be one of those boxing forum "anti-racists" from ESB etc. that follow me around because he seems to know about my past boxing posts.




ww

 

[werewolf]

the youtube video is not viewable from france :lipsrsealed:

Zog-France. The Iron Heel has outlawed discussion of the Vampire in many countries in Europe, except of course whilst genuflecting and heaping praises upon the lords and masters.

As they say, if you want to know who is really in charge just find out who you aren't allowed to talk about or joke about.

 

[Menelik]

Aha, the Megaphone alert goes out and the second Sayanim waddles in to defend his inarticulate "zzz" 'ing landsman. This one loves to pound his fat little fingers on the keyboard, and this one says he abhors rudeness...so, for the edification of the learned audience here, I reproduce here Mr Rebajlowitz' brilliant and polite post from the Closed "Sandy Hoax" thread, addressed to moi:




The foaming at the mouth zio-retard's last bit, ""unhealthy" obsession with Negro boxers and their "steel wool" hair", refers to my round by round analysis of the Lewis-Vitali fight which Lewis "won" by first raking his glove laces across Vitali's face and then spending the rest of the fight rubbing his steel wool hair into the cut that was opened by the laces. He should have been disqualified.

And so should these two trojan horses here, Rebajloberg and Menelik The Black Jewish Prince. Rebajlo must be one of those boxing forum "anti-racists" from ESB etc. that follow me around because he seems to know about my past boxing posts.




ww

Jibba jabba from the resident flamer.

zzz

 

[werewolf]

Jibba jabba from the resident flamer.

zzz

Black Jewish Prince here, though stupid and totally inarticulate, serves the cause by being on here 24/7. Whenever I post something the little retard responds with one of his "zzz's" in about one second.




ww

 

[Menelik]

Black Jewish Prince here, though stupid and totally inarticulate, serves the cause by being on here 24/7. Whenever I post something the little retard responds with one of his "zzz's" in about one second.




ww

Youre projecting again wolf****.

zzz

 

[werewolf]

Zios like Menelik The BJP here and his landsman Rebjlowitzenberg, and another one or two, work the forum. Unfortunately, they are able to trick a lot of white people by leading the conversations into subjects that are "safe" and OK with them, like let's just talk about how much we hate schwartzes and Moslems, OK, schmucks? They are masters at tricking the goyim.

 

[Menelik]

Zios like Menelik The BJP here and his landsman Rebjlowitzenberg, and another one or two, work the forum. Unfortunately, they are able to trick a lot of white people by leading the conversations into subjects that are "safe" and OK with them, like let's just talk about how much we hate schwartzes and Moslems, OK, schmucks? They are masters at tricking the goyim.

zzz

 

[werewolf]

zzz

Any forum that allows these out and out in your face trolls to trash it with their mindless spam, like this one and its landsman - see above - is worthless...and then, come to think of it, when they trash it enough the thread just gets locked. I better get outa here. Just a waste of time.



ww

 

[Don Wassall]

Any forum that allows these out and out in your face trolls to trash it with their mindless spam, like this one and its landsman - see above - is worthless...and then, come to think of it, when they trash it enough the thread just gets locked. I better get outa here. Just a waste of time.



ww

Rebajlo has written many posts that Zionists would label "virulently anti-Semitic." Everyone that disagrees with you is not a "ziotroll." You are quick to call names, which enhances bad feelings between various posters. Not saying anyone is blameless here and I also get carried away at times when I see what I consider naïve posts, but the idea is to disagree civilly, not by dismissing points of view simply by calling someone a name.

 

[werewolf]

Rebajlo has written many posts that Zionists would label "virulently anti-Semitic." Everyone that disagrees with you is not a "ziotroll." You are quick to call names, which enhances bad feelings between various posters. Not saying anyone is blameless here and I also get carried away at times when I see what I consider naïve posts, but the idea is to disagree civilly, not by dismissing points of view simply by calling someone a name.

Look at post #90 above where I copied Rebajo's lengthy and maniacal - and revealing - ravings disrupting the Sandy Hoax thread, and his Black Jewish Prince buddy's numerous "zzz" posts, and then you tell me that I'm supposed to "disagree civilly" with THAT! - and I'm "dismissing points of view" simply by "calling someone a name". Yeah, OK, you're right, you got me, I'm guilty, I dismissed the "zzz" point of view and the "bat signals" point of view "by calling a name".




ww

 

[Don Wassall]

Like I wrote, no one is blameless. And as I've written before, your posts would be more effective without being so quick to argue with and label those who disagree with you as Zionists and trolls.

It's time for a moratorium on name calling. The mods and I are pretty good at deciding who's a troll, and posters who think someone is a troll have been asked repeatedly to make their concerns known through pms. Stick to the posting guidelines.