Extra Point
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2012
- Messages
- 6,289
The analysts parroting the party line that Trump's vision is dark and dreary.
So much false rubbish bubbled out of her trap with the psychotic smile like the joker. He should attack much more at her weakness of emails, Middle East disasters, Clinton Foundation, etc.
It is a disadvantage for Trump that he can't bring up some of the most damming things about Clinton or he will be portrayed as crazy. Such as the fact that 60 people connected to the Clintons have died under mysterious circumstances, or that Hillary talks constantly about her plan to defeat ISIS, when her and Obama created ISIS. Or the massive corruption of the Clinton Foundation. It shows how the Globalist media has framed the false narrative.
Is it over?
Good news! A Clinton supporter I've been trying to get to support Trump has now changed his mind and is now supporting Trump!
He's now going to vote for Trump as a result of this debate!
I may have been too pessimistic on how this debate will affect voters.
Five times (at least) Holt shilled for Clinton:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/26/lester-holt-candy-crowley-moment-first-debate/
Of course we knew this would happen. F'ing MSMFive times (at least) Holt shilled for Clinton:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/26/lester-holt-candy-crowley-moment-first-debate/
Did he say why? Was it that smug self satisfied smirk on the hag's face? People who smile and laugh too much and inappropriately, I never trust them.
Men and women are simple. He just has to keep up his main line that the psycho has been destroying things for 30 or more years so why now is she going to suddenly make better? Most people just have to look around them in our cities to see that whatever they're doing now is not working.
Of course we knew this would happen. F'ing MSM
As I expected, Trump not only had to battle/debate Hillary but the moderator as well. No questions on Benghazi, the emails or the Clinton Foundation because these issues don't exist in the minds of the MSM. She most likely had the questions well before the debate happened. The fact that he was the one on the defensive is laughable. He's never held office, thus he's never voted on any piece of legislation that has caused the massive corruption and kleptocracy. Lester is most likely CIA (like all MSM "news" anchors) and a gatekeeper of this utterly corrupt and contemptible system.
As I expected, Trump not only had to battle/debate Hillary but the moderator as well. No questions on Benghazi, the emails or the Clinton Foundation because these issues don't exist in the minds of the MSM. She most likely had the questions well before the debate happened. The fact that he was the one on the defensive is laughable. He's never held office, thus he's never voted on any piece of legislation that has caused the massive corruption and kleptocracy. Lester is most likely CIA (like all MSM "news" anchors) and a gatekeeper of this utterly corrupt and contemptible system.
Like Anderson Cooper for instance. And yes the questions were tailor made for the hag and the way she answered them without hesitation, I believe she did know them all in advance and had memorized the script.