Todays "Just for Laughs"

[White_Savage]

"And why are black people thought to be so fast? Genetics? Evolution? Were they bred for physical fitness by slave owners? Oops can't say that. Forget the previous sentence. Then what? Is it because they were running through the jungle all day long trying to outrun tigers and lions? What were all the white people doing in their formative years? Wouldn't the slow white people have been eaten by all the local carnivores? Shouldn't Europe be filled with fat lions?"


Hey, Lions are African but Tigers are Asian...wonder why we haven't seen many world class sprinters from India...


Come to think of it, no human white or black can outrun a jungle cat, wolf, or bear...maybe it was enough just to outrun your fellow tribesman though, and everybody with the slow genes kept getting trimmed.


Of course, Europe had bears, wolves, and yes, lions, so yeah, why didn't they get fat on white meat?


Maybe because whites with their social organizationformed a hunting teamwhen a dangerous animal appeared, instead of letting the oldest person in the tribe become kibble?


So killing animals with clubs, stones, spears, etc, might be how we got so good at handling heavy weights and throwing things. And the guy who broke and ran would be the guy who got pulled down, whether by the bear or by his tribesmen later on, which tended to make standing your ground and general ballsyness favored in the 'ole genetic lottery.


Hey, it's just a theory

 

[pugnus]

"And why are black people thought to be so fast? Genetics? Evolution? Were they bred for physical fitness by slave owners? Oops can't say that. Forget the previous sentence. Then what? Is it because they were running through the jungle all day long trying to outrun tigers and lions? What were all the white people doing in their formative years? Wouldn't the slow white people have been eaten by all the local carnivores? Shouldn't Europe be filled with fat lions?"


Hey, Lions are African but Tigers are Asian...wonder why we haven't seen many world class sprinters from India...


Come to think of it, no human white or black can outrun a jungle cat, wolf, or bear...maybe it was enough just to outrun your fellow tribesman though, and everybody with the slow genes kept getting trimmed.


Of course, Europe had bears, wolves, and yes, lions, so yeah, why didn't they get fat on white meat?


Maybe because whites with their social organizationformed a hunting teamwhen a dangerous animal appeared, instead of letting the oldest person in the tribe become kibble?


So killing animals with clubs, stones, spears, etc, might be how we got so good at handling heavy weights and throwing things. And the guy who broke and ran would be the guy who got pulled down, whether by the bear or by his tribesmen later on, which tended to make standing your ground and general ballsyness favored in the 'ole genetic lottery.


Hey, it's just a theory

Masai in Kenya had to kill a lion with a spear and child before they could call themselves men.


Zulu herd boys protected their cattle against the predetors that where around


The Pygmee hunters still hunt for a living in this modern age

 

[Bear-Arms]

Pigmies don't strike me as being very athletic but I could be wrong.

 

[Don Wassall]

What they lack in height they undoubtedly make up with 72" vertical leaps!

 

[White Shogun]

Hey Pugnus, you mean the Masai had to kill a lion using a spear AND
child as weapons? Or that they had to KILL a lion AND a child before
they could call themselves men? Or do you mean that they had to
kill a lion and a cub before they could call themselves men?



Damn impressive anyway you look at it, eh?

Too bad though that the "pygmees" still have to hunt in this day and
age, what with the advent of supermarkets and all. Maybe
its a good thing though that civilization hasn't caught up to
them yet.. they haven't had to give up their native ways for all the
nonsense of civilization, accoutrements like the automobile, air
conditioning, radio, internet, mediine, antibiotics.. although I
did read that they are now hunting with firearms....

 

[White Shogun]

Pigmies don't strike me as being very athletic but I could be wrong.

Yeah but I bet they're FAST and have great HIP FLEXIBILITY! You ever see a pygmy dance?!! Lemme tell ya!

 

[White_Savage]

Yep, Glad you brought the Masai up, who are one of the reasons my post was somewhat facetious and a good example of why no generalization is ever 100% correct.Yes, the Masai used to go out in groupsto hunt lion witha shield and aspear, I don't think they do so anymore though, hunting regulations and all.The technique was to bring the lion to bay and make a pincushion out of it. If the lion charged you, you tried to bear his attack with your shield while your fellows finished it off. Very ballsy indeed.


Then again, the Masai and East Africans are a slightly different race than most westernized blacks, and lots of PHs report their bearers making haste when something big and toothsome makes an appearance. Of course, in their defense, the bearers arenot the oneswith the big @$%@#$ rifle.


And of course, we whites must have done alot of that in our formative years, since after all, we're soooo damn slow, we couldn't outrun the beastiesaye?

Without flight,your only other option isfight. And I bet knocking offa 1000 lbs.brown bear with hand weapons is an even toughter project than taking out a 500 lbs. lion, to say nothing of a cave bear or mammoth. Whites still have a greater enthusiasm and skill for hunting than any other developed people, I'm thinking this has got to be a racial memory of some kind. Otherwise, what could make otherwise wealthy and well-fed people spend so much time trudging the field in search of wild meat, hunt with primitive weapons instead of the superior tools we invented, and in the case of Lynn C. Thompson, decide to kill a Cape Buffalo from the ground with a spear?

 

[jaxvid]

Note how white athletes dominate at any sport that uses a "tool" of any kind. Hockey stick, baseball bat, tennis racket, lacrosse, golf, not to mention javelin, discus, hammer, etc. Perhaps different groups have evolved to make better use of simple tools whilst some groups are still in the more primative "tooless" stage.

 

[pugnus]

Hey Pugnus, you mean the Masai had to kill a lion using a spear AND child as weapons? Or that they had to KILL a lion AND a child before they could call themselves men? Or do you mean that they had to kill a lion and a cub before they could call themselves men?

Damn impressive anyway you look at it, eh?

Too bad though that the "pygmees" still have to hunt in this day and age, what with the advent of supermarkets and all. Maybe its a good thing though that civilization hasn't caught up to them yet.. they haven't had to give up their native ways for all the nonsense of civilization, accoutrements like the automobile, air conditioning, radio, internet, mediine, antibiotics.. although I did read that they are now hunting with firearms....

typo meant spear and shield

 

[Don Wassall]

Regarding the article's observation about whites being perceived only as possession receivers, here are the yards per reception average last year of some of the NFL's best-known black "big play" receivers:


Marvin Harrison - 12.9 yards per catch


Eric Moulds - 11.9


Derrick Mason - 12.2


Chad Johnson 13.4


Randy Moss, widely perceived as a deadly combination of size and speed, has a lifetime average of 15.9 yards per catch; Brian Finneran, widely perceived ashaving turtle-like speed, has a lifetime average of 14.9 yards per catch, just one yard less than Moss. Terrell Owens' is 14.6.

 

[Bart]

Randy Moss, widely perceived as a deadly combination of size and speed, has a lifetime average of 15.9 yards per catch; Brian Finneran, widely perceived ashaving turtle-like speed, has a lifetime average of 14.9 yards per catch, just one yard less than Moss. Terrell Owens' is 14.6./QUOTE]


Don, those statistics are amazing. Should I bring up Bill Schroeder's yards per catch -15.1?

 

[white lightning]

Does anyone know what Drew Bennett's average yards per
catch was for last season?It had to be just about as
high as anyother receiver out there.

 

[Don Wassall]

Bennett was 15.6 last year, 15.1 lifetime, same as that of the ultra-hated Bill Schroeder.

 

[Colonel_Reb]

I can hear Al Michaels saying his name right now. Bill Schroeder! Impressive stats guys.

 

[white lightning]

Bennett has over taken Moss as the best tall receiver
in the nfl.With his speed,height and jumping ability,
Drew should make the Pro Bowl this season.He also has
a knack for running really good routes.

 

[Bear-Arms]

Holland has the tallest people in the world I don't get the stereotype of white people being small. See what good healthcare can do for you.
My Proof

 

[Colonel_Reb]

I didn't know that about Holland. You learn something new every day.

 

[White_Savage]

Holland? Denmark was claiming it awhile back.

Here's the sad part: The fact that a Scandinavian country or two has passed the U.S. in average heigth was being used to argue in favor of their socialistic bullsh*t, when the actual fact is that American's population has always been made up of shorter non-Scandinavian whites, as well as shorter nonwhites, and the increasing numbers of mestizos and Asians must drop the average height even more. Sorry Bear-arms, but the fact that European healthcare is thouroughly Sovietized has nothing to do with the matter, though it does have something to do with a 4 month wait to use an MRI machine and mass flight of the better Euro doctors and nurses to the U.S.A.

 

[jaxvid]

Socialism is always a mess but works for a while in homogenous population countries with a sound work ethic. Libertarians have been predicting the collapse of western socialism for decades and they are still intact and functioning, often better then the US, as you can see from the strength of currencies. What libertarians always fail to account for is race. Scandanavian countries can run a socialized medicine because the people that live there are so closely related. it is just like a family, no one feels it is wrong to contribute to the health care of their kin. Where socialized medicine breaks down is when the people of a country are not family. Now in scandinavia with so many immigrants (non fmaily) the system is really breaking, also the new imigrants do not share the work ethic of the scandanavian people.

Socialized medicine would be an absolute disaster in the US as we unfortunately will find out someday, and that is also why it sucks in multi-cultural Canada. I think you may also be confusing the Canadian system with the European systems. I don't think any European doctors are coming over here (maybe Eastern european) and health care in places like Germany is excellent, none of the waiting and problems you see in places like Canada.

The Soviet Union was also different then Scandanavia, too ethnically diverse, and a poor work ethic

 

[Gary]

The Dutch are very tall-Ted Van der Parre won the World's Strongest Man Contest at 7' 350lbs.By the way did you ever see the movie "Zulu" where a few British troops beat thousands of Zulu "warriors"?Intead of killing a lion the Zulu's should try a good Welshman!

 

[Colonel_Reb]

Gary, thanks for the reminder, I haven't seen Zulu in a long time. Good point though.

 

[White_Savage]

Jax: Ever been to the VA? Our government can't even provide good free healthcare for veterans. Imagine what it's like when they try to do it for everybody.

What you're saying it seems to me is that socialism doesn't always totally destroy the awesome productivity and creativity of the white race right away, while it will immediately crash and burn in a nation full of born parasites. That's like saying poison doesn't always sicken a strong man right away. Not really a newsflash to me.

Even so, you can see the bad effects it's had on the white man's morale over there. 60% of Swedish babys are born bastards-that's about the same percentage as our ********! If the mommy state is funding the little bastards, why not screw without committment? Of course, the babies will grow up almost as bad as our ******** too, sans a Daddy to keep them on the right path. Not a good thing, I'm sure you'll agree.

Let's not over-praise Europe. It's drunk even more Leftist (largely Jewish sponsored) ideological poison than the U.S. The population is turning as brown as the U.S. very quickly. My exposition of the fact that Leftist is Jewish could get me thrown in jail in many countries over there. Great Britain is considering banning kitchen knives (No sh*t!) The economy is stagnant because it doesn't pay to go into business over there, even though they try to cook the books in their favor. (With help from Jewish finance, I'm quite sure.) A few positive things here and there like opposing Israel doesn't make the place a shining beacon for Western Civillization, Liberty, or the White Race.

 

[jaxvid]

I agree with much of what you say. I only commented on the issue because as bad as socialism is it seems to work better in places where the population is homogenous. This is due to race and genetic considerations.

I would disagree that Swedish babies without fathers will turn out to be as bad as single black babies in America. But out of wedlock births are a bad thing, more likely due to a decline in Christianity then socialism. Also as I understand it most fathers remain with the mother they just don't marry them.

I also just heard that Britian is considering banning kitchen knives! Is it just me or is England becomming more and more like a Monty Python sketch?

 

[Colonel_Reb]

Europe is losing everything resembling common sense. Their people have lost all of their freedoms. The socialist countries have totally brainwashed the people and can pretty much do what they want, especially now that the people don't have any guns. For America, let it be a harbinger of things to come and a wake up call.

 

[White_Savage]

Jax:
Both black and white illegitamacy rates were lower in this country before the wellfare state. Not being a Christian, I don't believe it's the magic of Christian preaching that did it...I believe it's the basic fact that when the state takes care of the baby, theres no need to try to make Daddy do so. The practical exigencies of illegitmacy in the old days are what led to it being stigmatized in most traditional cultures, American Christian, Heathen Norse, Ancient Roman, whatever. Artificially take away those consequences, and the stigma evaporates rather quickly. Of course even WORSE consequences rear their ugly head, but most people do not have the intellect and foresight to grasp them, apparently. Therefore, while feeding the poor wittle childrens seems like a good idea, letting them starve would be more humane for society as a whole in the long run. Especially since it would cut into the breeding success rate of the most sub-optimal humanoids.