I came to this site courtesy of Steve Sailer, I had come to accept the HBD position that different races differed in their basic aptitudes, I accepted the pattern of Black/Hispanic under peformance academically and economically was rooted in biological causes, it seemed credible that black over performance athletically was probably rooted in biology too. The evidence here has convinced me that the current demographics of the NFL, NBA, MLB and Track are not Representative of innate talents but I couldn't understand why. The party line here seems to be the TPTB are cultural marxist white haters maybe I have missed a more nuanced description of phenomenon but that didn't quite sit right with me.
NFL owners are white themselves and they are mostly right leaning politicaly, they're members of the corporate elite they worship Capital not socialism(except the corporate welfare kind). Whats their motivation for marginalizing white players. It is true that this is the same class of people that drives immigration policy which is anti white in its effects but I think the motivation isn't adherence to marxism/po mo or anti white sentiments. Its dollars and cents their corporations benefit from immigration by driving down wages while they shift the costs to the tax payer(education, welfare and crime).
I didn't see how this could apply to the NFL, if anything it seems to me you could probably undercut salaries by promoting more white players how many white players have held out for contracts over the last few years compared to black players?
This Post from Steve's blog got my gears working and it suddenly made sense to me. It is a straight economic consideration driven by a simple truth, whites in this country(and europe) have given up racism, blacks haven't, in fact no other group in the world has!
The black fans of DC are far more likely to root for a team that looks like them, while the white fans aren't. Likewise in the locker room the blacks band together to protect their interests(ownership of certain positions, demanding representation at others) the whites have internalized that to do the same would be racist of them and so don't. The owners are just going were the money is or seems to be if Chris Johnson jersey's sell to suburban white kids as well as ghetto blacks while Hillis Jerseys don't, if having Hillis on your team means a locker room of disgruntled Blacks why bother with a white running back. I think its starting to bite them because I think whites are getting feed up and the popularity of Tebow and Hillis reflects this, and the product is getting terrible diluted by the quota system. Still the NFL is the most successful sports league in the world why mess with a good thing if you are an owner?
In this sense I guess cultural marxism/po mo are root causes because without their effects on white racial awareness, it wouldn't make economic sense for the major sports leagues to let themselves become black/hispanic dominated.
If white fan loyalty and white money is completely divorced from the racial make up of the teams but more blacks means more black fans, more hispanics means more hispanic fans, more asians means more asian fans its just good business to promote non white players over whites.
As with so many other issues right now it seems like it simply boils down to whites realizing they have have to protect their group interests the way every other group does and is encouraged to.
NFL owners are white themselves and they are mostly right leaning politicaly, they're members of the corporate elite they worship Capital not socialism(except the corporate welfare kind). Whats their motivation for marginalizing white players. It is true that this is the same class of people that drives immigration policy which is anti white in its effects but I think the motivation isn't adherence to marxism/po mo or anti white sentiments. Its dollars and cents their corporations benefit from immigration by driving down wages while they shift the costs to the tax payer(education, welfare and crime).
I didn't see how this could apply to the NFL, if anything it seems to me you could probably undercut salaries by promoting more white players how many white players have held out for contracts over the last few years compared to black players?
This Post from Steve's blog got my gears working and it suddenly made sense to me. It is a straight economic consideration driven by a simple truth, whites in this country(and europe) have given up racism, blacks haven't, in fact no other group in the world has!
The black fans of DC are far more likely to root for a team that looks like them, while the white fans aren't. Likewise in the locker room the blacks band together to protect their interests(ownership of certain positions, demanding representation at others) the whites have internalized that to do the same would be racist of them and so don't. The owners are just going were the money is or seems to be if Chris Johnson jersey's sell to suburban white kids as well as ghetto blacks while Hillis Jerseys don't, if having Hillis on your team means a locker room of disgruntled Blacks why bother with a white running back. I think its starting to bite them because I think whites are getting feed up and the popularity of Tebow and Hillis reflects this, and the product is getting terrible diluted by the quota system. Still the NFL is the most successful sports league in the world why mess with a good thing if you are an owner?
In this sense I guess cultural marxism/po mo are root causes because without their effects on white racial awareness, it wouldn't make economic sense for the major sports leagues to let themselves become black/hispanic dominated.
If white fan loyalty and white money is completely divorced from the racial make up of the teams but more blacks means more black fans, more hispanics means more hispanic fans, more asians means more asian fans its just good business to promote non white players over whites.
As with so many other issues right now it seems like it simply boils down to whites realizing they have have to protect their group interests the way every other group does and is encouraged to.