Thoughts on the Caste System

Fenris

Newbie
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
21
I came to this site courtesy of Steve Sailer, I had come to accept the HBD position that different races differed in their basic aptitudes, I accepted the pattern of Black/Hispanic under peformance academically and economically was rooted in biological causes, it seemed credible that black over performance athletically was probably rooted in biology too. The evidence here has convinced me that the current demographics of the NFL, NBA, MLB and Track are not Representative of innate talents but I couldn't understand why. The party line here seems to be the TPTB are cultural marxist white haters maybe I have missed a more nuanced description of phenomenon but that didn't quite sit right with me.

NFL owners are white themselves and they are mostly right leaning politicaly, they're members of the corporate elite they worship Capital not socialism(except the corporate welfare kind). Whats their motivation for marginalizing white players. It is true that this is the same class of people that drives immigration policy which is anti white in its effects but I think the motivation isn't adherence to marxism/po mo or anti white sentiments. Its dollars and cents their corporations benefit from immigration by driving down wages while they shift the costs to the tax payer(education, welfare and crime).

I didn't see how this could apply to the NFL, if anything it seems to me you could probably undercut salaries by promoting more white players how many white players have held out for contracts over the last few years compared to black players?

This Post from Steve's blog got my gears working and it suddenly made sense to me. It is a straight economic consideration driven by a simple truth, whites in this country(and europe) have given up racism, blacks haven't, in fact no other group in the world has!

The black fans of DC are far more likely to root for a team that looks like them, while the white fans aren't. Likewise in the locker room the blacks band together to protect their interests(ownership of certain positions, demanding representation at others) the whites have internalized that to do the same would be racist of them and so don't. The owners are just going were the money is or seems to be if Chris Johnson jersey's sell to suburban white kids as well as ghetto blacks while Hillis Jerseys don't, if having Hillis on your team means a locker room of disgruntled Blacks why bother with a white running back. I think its starting to bite them because I think whites are getting feed up and the popularity of Tebow and Hillis reflects this, and the product is getting terrible diluted by the quota system. Still the NFL is the most successful sports league in the world why mess with a good thing if you are an owner?

In this sense I guess cultural marxism/po mo are root causes because without their effects on white racial awareness, it wouldn't make economic sense for the major sports leagues to let themselves become black/hispanic dominated.

If white fan loyalty and white money is completely divorced from the racial make up of the teams but more blacks means more black fans, more hispanics means more hispanic fans, more asians means more asian fans its just good business to promote non white players over whites.

As with so many other issues right now it seems like it simply boils down to whites realizing they have have to protect their group interests the way every other group does and is encouraged to.
 

Liverlips

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
4,197
I think it pretty much comes down to the fact that coaches, scouts, fans, reporters, owners ...etc believe in black athletic supremacy.

Moreover, blacks on the team do not like when a white running back or receiver excels. If there is a QB controversy between a white and a black, who are the blacks going to throw their support behind? If a white gets to be QB, run the ball or play corner over a black they are going to accuse the coach of "racism."

Whites do none of this. They just shut up and play and don't cause trouble.

So it is just easier to pack the teams with blacks and keep whites to a few slots on the O-line, TE, FB and maybe 1-2 backup linebackers. And - of course - the white "special teams demon" is a walking stereotype.

That is why we support the few whites who get the chance to play taboo positions such as tailback, receiver or CB. Coaches/owners/players who break this taboo are taking a huge risk and deserve our support.
 

Truthteller

Mentor
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
1,205
In this sense I guess cultural marxism/po mo are root causes because without their effects on white racial awareness, it wouldn't make economic sense for the major sports leagues to let themselves become black/hispanic dominated.

If white fan loyalty and white money is completely divorced from the racial make up of the teams but more blacks means more black fans, more hispanics means more hispanic fans, more asians means more asian fans its just good business to promote non white players over whites.

I've posted this before and will post it again and again if I have to. It should help you understand how this has evolved over the years. This has been part of the Marxist agenda, along with the Caste system, since 1912, at least?


Don Wassall said:
The communist Israel Cohen was quite blunt a century ago in stating the benefits of what would become the U.S.'s Caste System in sports:

"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause."

Israel Cohen, A Racial Program for he Twentieth Century, 1912. Also in the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
The caste system. Very good forum and website but imho it's erroneously named. The caste system wasn't something destructive to the white race, but rather to a certain extent it preserved the white race on the Indian subcontinent. The white man created civilization there as he did most places on the planet, and through the caste system the race was somewhat preserved for thousands of years.

The Aryan Race in Iran, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan,India
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0TQ1gj8GQo&feature=player_embedded
 
Last edited:

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
WW, I believe "Caste" Football was named due to the cultural marxists pushing a caste-like system in sports...with the "soopa affletes" on top, followed by latinos, then asians & "untouchable" Whites. Thus the pro-caste lackeys push this system & myth of black athletic supremacy.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
WW, I believe "Caste" Football was named due to the cultural marxists pushing a caste-like system in sports...with the "soopa affletes" on top, followed by latinos, then asians & "untouchable" Whites. Thus the pro-caste lackeys push this system & myth of black athletic supremacy.


An upside down caste system, huh? -where instead of the superior Brahmin (Aryan) descendents of the creators and builders and maintainers of the civilization, the lowest of the low gets artificially installed on high!
 

Michael

Mentor
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
870
Many in the hierarchy of sports are Caucasoid but not White, they are Jews.

Also, if we look back even at the "elite" of our own race, they have often favored other races over their own people. If we look at the old South the black slaves were viewed by the Slave owning class as above common Whites. For the last thousand years, in many places in Europe Jews were used by the nobility as a barrier between themselves and the common Whites. Jews were also often allowed in to steal from the common Whites and split the loot with the nobility What do you think the Jew tax was all about. The King taking his share of the money, he allow the Jews to steal from the common people.

At times, the elite of a nation would use another White nationality between themselves and their common people as the ancient Romans did with their Greek slaves.

This fear of ones own people likely emerges from a deep rooted fear maybe even a subconscious one that their own people could takeover and remove the "elite" from power, but in the early stages, the outsiders do not have a base to do that from but in a few generations they can, which maybe why the Jews have been able to almost takeover the White world. At this point, the White "elite" and the Jews need each other to keep their power but both appear likely wanting to remove the other.

We most also remember that many Whites do not think for think for themselves and will internalize the propaganda that they are feed by the "elite" and many "elite" may even fall for their own propaganda. Of course, these same people will chance their belief 180 degrees if a new group gains power on a dime and not even think about that they have changed.
 

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
We most also remember that many Whites do not think for think for themselves and will internalize the propaganda that they are feed by the "elite" and many "elite" may even fall for their own propaganda. Of course, these same people will chance their belief 180 degrees if a new group gains power on a dime and not even think about that they have changed.

this is why there was a king in europe, and nobility
the diference is who is the king, what kind of man he is
the perfect king for me is phillip the fair
when the people wanted to accept money from the jews (like a lot of americans, who bought things with money they didn't have) , they were actually being bought by the jews, they were losing theit liberty
the king saw that, and he expelled the jews
this was unpopular at the time, since the people want to live a better life regardless of the consequences, and so they liked the jews, but he did what he had to do
this kind of decisions is not possible when you ask the people (=democracy)
 
Last edited:

Matra2

Master
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
2,337
Many in the hierarchy of sports are Caucasoid but not White, they are Jews.

Exhibit A: The NFL. There are always calls for more diversity at the QB position and the coaches, etc. They want more diversity everywhere except at the ownership level.
 
Top