Realgeorge
Mentor
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2004
- Messages
- 675
The demise of the NHL is predicted by many, hoped for by many more, and propagandized primarily by the Liberal TV sports media. For sure. Dan Daly of the Washington Times (an odious Neocon rag) declares the NHL "Dead, dead, dead. Hockey is dead." Maybe yes, maybe no. A few dynamics come to mind.
First the fans. Sport fans get ticked when their favorite sport goes into strike mode. Baseball's most recent strike made fans slightly -- slightly, folks -- less in love with the national pastime. The two or three seasons after the 1990s strike were less lucrative than normal MLB seasons, but not much. After five or so years the baseball fan was back into a good mood, and the League carries on. Even with Bonzo Bud Selig in charge! I reject the many claims that the jilted hockey fan will desert the NHL. Even the major Canadian papers and Canada.com's "Faceoff!" column crow about fans deserting the sport. Ken Dryden himself had a column last week about hockey fans finding that their "love affairs" with the NHL were superficial and that the fan can live without it. Well I'm a hockey fan, I know many hockey fans. The answer is Merde Merde Merde!! it just isn't true. Pull the plug on the NHL season, but as soon as it starts up again, the fans will return. Only a psychopathic Caucasoid maniac could be a hockey fan in the first place. I predict a 20% fan loss from the current melee, and if the NHL gets its poo into one sock, it can recover fans with interest in five years.
Second the teams. Owners, managers, coaches, players. [Yuck, even agents] They all want to get back to work. Surely much richer than in decades past, but they want to get it going again. They're about to be disappointed that the gravy train will return a paltry sum ... but return to work they will. Many NHLers are overseas plying their trade, but they'll be back in a heartbeat once the real league starts up again. And let me tell you about replacement players: There is a THRIVING minor league hockey system in the US of A, filled with talent. Not just the AHL and East Coast Hockey League, but even Southern states have successful minor league franchises. Good Gosh, places like New Orleans, Biloxi MS, and Jacksonville FL have well established hockey clubs with passionate fan base. Just like with baseball players, the US of A is oozing with hockey players, talented ones too, and hungry for attention and cash. The 700 NHL players have a reason to fear for their slots once the league starts up again.
Now the real deal: Television. The veiled threat by the ESPN doomsayers is "Death to the NHL, we will pull them from programming if they go on strike." Ah, we will GET you, you pristine white soo-premicist hockey stick weilding people, just TRY and go on strike, we'll pluck you off the airwaves. It's all about the television contract you see. Well -- I will remind the reader that the NHL has not always had a TV contract. And very recently. Look back the past thirty years, and the NHL played many of the past 30 seasons without a national TV contract. I bought my first cable TV subscription in 1985 precisely to watch NHL games on the USA Network (remember them? Their lead color analyst was the venerable Bill Clement, now with ESPN).
There were a bunch of years between 1980 and now where the NHL was not on TV (I invite the readership to dig up the exact years. USA gave up after one season. ESPN was in, out, in, out and in again. So was ABC) During the 1960s and 70s, Peter Puck was nary to be seen except for a few years on NBC. Boring you once again, I watched the 1991 Stanley Cup Finals in a dingy bar in Melbourne FL, courtesy of NESN, the New England Sports Network (who was sooo pissed that the Bruins didn't make it that year). Pittsburgh and Minnesota played a fine six-game series of firewagon hockey. The league did just fine without ESPN, although they would have preferred a national presence.
So the NHL has played without ESPN in the past, and the local city networks (DonWas has pointed out) carry fine ratings when airing the local NHL team. Many teams televise their entire 82 game schedules through big cable. Comcast in Philadelphia and Washington will put their NHL games on TV again. Ga-ron-tee.
Much of the gloom and doom, in my right-wing opinion, is emotion from real fans, and pure hatred from the NWO, white-loathing maggots of the TV sports biz. Maybe the worst will happen and the NHL will tank. Methinks its more likely to carry on where it left off. It will recover to sprightliness in a few short years. And I sure hope MY stinky team gets some players on its roster and kicks the living schidte out of the Flyers, Rangers and the Devils during the 2005-06 season.Edited by: Realgeorge
First the fans. Sport fans get ticked when their favorite sport goes into strike mode. Baseball's most recent strike made fans slightly -- slightly, folks -- less in love with the national pastime. The two or three seasons after the 1990s strike were less lucrative than normal MLB seasons, but not much. After five or so years the baseball fan was back into a good mood, and the League carries on. Even with Bonzo Bud Selig in charge! I reject the many claims that the jilted hockey fan will desert the NHL. Even the major Canadian papers and Canada.com's "Faceoff!" column crow about fans deserting the sport. Ken Dryden himself had a column last week about hockey fans finding that their "love affairs" with the NHL were superficial and that the fan can live without it. Well I'm a hockey fan, I know many hockey fans. The answer is Merde Merde Merde!! it just isn't true. Pull the plug on the NHL season, but as soon as it starts up again, the fans will return. Only a psychopathic Caucasoid maniac could be a hockey fan in the first place. I predict a 20% fan loss from the current melee, and if the NHL gets its poo into one sock, it can recover fans with interest in five years.
Second the teams. Owners, managers, coaches, players. [Yuck, even agents] They all want to get back to work. Surely much richer than in decades past, but they want to get it going again. They're about to be disappointed that the gravy train will return a paltry sum ... but return to work they will. Many NHLers are overseas plying their trade, but they'll be back in a heartbeat once the real league starts up again. And let me tell you about replacement players: There is a THRIVING minor league hockey system in the US of A, filled with talent. Not just the AHL and East Coast Hockey League, but even Southern states have successful minor league franchises. Good Gosh, places like New Orleans, Biloxi MS, and Jacksonville FL have well established hockey clubs with passionate fan base. Just like with baseball players, the US of A is oozing with hockey players, talented ones too, and hungry for attention and cash. The 700 NHL players have a reason to fear for their slots once the league starts up again.
Now the real deal: Television. The veiled threat by the ESPN doomsayers is "Death to the NHL, we will pull them from programming if they go on strike." Ah, we will GET you, you pristine white soo-premicist hockey stick weilding people, just TRY and go on strike, we'll pluck you off the airwaves. It's all about the television contract you see. Well -- I will remind the reader that the NHL has not always had a TV contract. And very recently. Look back the past thirty years, and the NHL played many of the past 30 seasons without a national TV contract. I bought my first cable TV subscription in 1985 precisely to watch NHL games on the USA Network (remember them? Their lead color analyst was the venerable Bill Clement, now with ESPN).
There were a bunch of years between 1980 and now where the NHL was not on TV (I invite the readership to dig up the exact years. USA gave up after one season. ESPN was in, out, in, out and in again. So was ABC) During the 1960s and 70s, Peter Puck was nary to be seen except for a few years on NBC. Boring you once again, I watched the 1991 Stanley Cup Finals in a dingy bar in Melbourne FL, courtesy of NESN, the New England Sports Network (who was sooo pissed that the Bruins didn't make it that year). Pittsburgh and Minnesota played a fine six-game series of firewagon hockey. The league did just fine without ESPN, although they would have preferred a national presence.
So the NHL has played without ESPN in the past, and the local city networks (DonWas has pointed out) carry fine ratings when airing the local NHL team. Many teams televise their entire 82 game schedules through big cable. Comcast in Philadelphia and Washington will put their NHL games on TV again. Ga-ron-tee.
Much of the gloom and doom, in my right-wing opinion, is emotion from real fans, and pure hatred from the NWO, white-loathing maggots of the TV sports biz. Maybe the worst will happen and the NHL will tank. Methinks its more likely to carry on where it left off. It will recover to sprightliness in a few short years. And I sure hope MY stinky team gets some players on its roster and kicks the living schidte out of the Flyers, Rangers and the Devils during the 2005-06 season.Edited by: Realgeorge