2,000 years is a long time. When discussing the modern state of Israel, it is impossible to draw a direct lineage to the State that existed around 1 AD. The claim of modern Israel is based and almost entirely supported around the idea that the land was promised them by God, which is supported by ancient texts that were written down by Jewish hands.<?:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
ffice
ffice" />
So basically, we have a group of people who, backed by the U.N., displaced people who had been living on the land we now call Israel based upon not only a claim written down over 2,000 years ago, but that they are the people named in that claim. Think about that. That's like me saying that I am entitled to land in Denmark because I say I'm of Saxon heritage and they lived there 2,000 years ago by the decree of Odin.
There is no evidence that modern Israelis are the direct descendants of the Jews that were sent into the Diaspora by the Romans. They clearly take in converts (including the entire nation of Khazaria), who should have no claim to that land, and they clearly have mixed with non-Jewish inhabitants of the nations they emigrated to, which in 2,000 years (given 3 generations in 100 years) could result in someone having a statistically insignificant amount of true Jewish blood running through their veins (In just 60 generations or 2,000 years someone could be considered Jewish, given that they come from a line where the original maternal Jew mixed with a non-Jew and each generation followed suit, with 1/576,460,752,303,423,000th Jewish blood in them.).
In a very real example, the same logic could be used by the United Nations to grant Mestizo's ownership of the Southwestern United States based upon their mythological belief that it is the homeland of the Aztec people. This belief of course is supported by nothing more then their claim to not only BE the Aztec people (of which clearly most of them are not) but their claim that the land of Aztlan was theirs at some point thousands of years ago, and is promised by THEIR god to be theirs again. Do you think Americans would just stand by and allow the Mestizo's to come and occupy their land without a fight?
I have no problem with people moving into a land and taking possession of it. It's the way of the world. My problem is with the way modern Israel accomplished their task. In occupying the land of Israel, they defamed the Germans, transferred a massive amount of wealth from White people (in the form of reparations for the supposed Holocaust, as well as tax dollars in the form of foreign aid) destabilized the middle East which resulted in the loss of a Christian nation (as Lebanon was swamped with Muslim refugees who tilted the balance of power against the ruling Christian government) and became actively involved in manipulating White governments through the power of international banking (which has long been controlled by Jewry), media manipulation and subversive measures (U.S.S. Liberty, Nuclear Espionage against the U.S., etc.). I believe it is dishonorable to behave in this manner, and I believe Israel should be forced to stand on her own two feet and face those who believe she should not exist without the aid of the White Nations. I personally don't care if she extends her border all the way to the Sea of Japan, as long as Whites are not forced through manipulative tactics to participate.
Edited by: reclaimsocal 
