Hey SH, I really appreciate these historical antecedents; I find them fascinating.
There is always some sort of back story and context for a lot of football teams, including complex locker room politics, roles and yes, racial relationships/loyalty.
Some teams and players have it better then others obviously.
It may be cliche, but some teams have a certain principle of true loyalty to the team. This I propose is due to historical precedent and often ownership ideology.
It's all very, very subtle.
Things in the locker room have changed drastically in the last 20 or 30 years, as society in general has clearly changed for the worse (read more anti-White)...there are glimmers of hope and people 'in the know' become a sort of unwritten about, invisible 'holy warrior' carrying the mantle of strong White Manism.
Bob Kraft and NE are generally a subtle example of fostering a fair and balanced locker room.
Do you know its not uncommon for certain NFL teams to have 'White Boy' Wednesday for the locker room/weight training music?
Most of the time, it's hip hop and gangsta rap.
Of course there exists a social hierarchy that is not always based upon internal racial politics.
Yet this is rare and you are talking about the elite of the elite or 'kings' if you will of the team: Brees, Manning, Brady, Favre (before the last couple years debacle).
Hillis has the potential to enter this realm.
SH, any comments of the 70s Vikings teams? They were overall quite White friendly, of course the front 4 were the leaders. I understand that Page, Marshall, and Eller were all very respected and fair with everyone.
Is this true?