Some Possesion Receiver Stats

Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
461
Comparing the top five white receiver to the top five black receiver I found the following stats for each group.

The black receivers were 34.2% more likeley to be targeted
The blacks caught passes they were targeted for 6.16% less often than the whites
The blacks averaged 0.79 yards less per reception
THE WHITES AVERAGED 13.2 MORE YARDS FOR THEIR LONGEST RECEPTION.( I guess the defense was shocked into inaction at the sight of a white receiver, these white men could not possibly be fast))

Three of the five Quarterbacks with the highest completions per centages have a white receiver to throw to. Ironically the 5 QBs who thow to these five white receivers are 5.04% more likely to complete a pass than the QB'as throwint to the 5 top black receivers. The two receivers who do not have top five completion QB have a black QB and a hispanic QB.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
Good stats! Nice work. Really makes the point doesn't it?
smiley32.gif
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
Great work tired!
smiley20.gif
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
Excellent work, old White. What was the time frame for the research you conducted, i.e. 2007, just this weekend, etc?
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,454
Location
Pennsylvania
C'mon don't pester him with questions, he's old andtired.
smiley36.gif



Just kidding. Nice stuff TOW!
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
I'm askin' cause I want to use this the next time I'm talking football at the water cooler!
smiley36.gif
 

ToughJ.Riggins

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
5,063
Location
Ontario Canada
Tired old White said:
Comparing the top five white receiver to the top five black receiver

The blacks caught passes they were targeted for 6.16% less often than the whites

Great research, that's a great stat above. It amazes me how many balls I see starting black WRs drop. The Falcons WRs Monday night had a ridiculous amount of drops, probably about 6-8 combined, all "in one game." Terrell Owens one of the best black WRs gets thrown to galore, but his hands are nothing special. Yet Matt Jones gets put in the dog house and mocked by his coach for a mere two drops last year.
smiley18.gif


These stats would seem to indicate that QBs are better off throwing to white WRs b/c they catch the ball more often. But the black supremacists would insist this is b/c blacks are targeted for deep balls more often b/c of their speed which is why they catch less of their passes. Yet your other statistic indicates that the top white WRs average better longest long balls caught this year! The whites certainly don't seem to be having a problem catching the long ball!
smiley32.gif
 
G

Guest

Guest
So are JP Losman, Tony Romo, and Jeff Garcia white or not in this analysis?
 
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
461
The time period is the current season up to last night. 16 October 2007. Source of info was Sports Illustrated NFL States.
 

Riggins44

Master
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
3,043
Location
Virginia
I think there were 4 starting white wise receivers last week, out of about 54 starting wide receivers in the league, counting the bye week teams. So 3 out of those 4 had at least 121 yards receiving in their game! And Walters had 160. Makes you wonder what would happen how other white WRs could do, huh
smiley24.gif
What kind of numbers would Hass, Standeford, Ball, or Samardjia be putting up?

The Redskins black receivers were horrible on Sunday against the Packers. They had at least 6 dropped balls amongst them, and a few of these were really EASY catches. Santana Moss had a truly horrible game. He missed one 30 yard floater that was right in his hands; he actually looked retarded when it clunked off his hands. Then he fumbled the ball on a reverse that the Packers ran back for the game winning TD. Mike Sellers is a FB but he is also good for a solid 1-2 drops a game. He missed one easy catch in the end zone which caused the Skins to lose to the Giants earlier this year.

I think Jason Campbell is learning that Chris Cooley is by far his most dependable receiver.&nb sp;
 

Riggins44

Master
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
3,043
Location
Virginia
Just to follow up on this, there were 10 receivers who gained over 100 yards in week 6. And 4 of them were white.
smiley32.gif
 
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
461
That means that at lest one of my five Welker,Witten Curtis,Walter or Clark is either not a starter or a a tight end and still one of the top 50 receivers.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Caste system is organized (albeit loosely) by 50 something white men at the peak of their profession. These clowns literally spent their entire lives learning that MLK was god, they dream and perhaps even think they were civil rights marchers, and most of all they are bathed in false glory by the owners of what passes for media now days. Talk about a circle jerk. And its collapsing because a few white men who might even believe the false gods of equality themselves but refuse to personally give up. Then there are the heretics out there in the blogosphere who post stats such as these.We could produce a movie, our version of "Falling Down" the story of a 50 year old ass clown liberal thrown out of work because his caste team went 1-15 just before they were packed away to the court room.
 
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
461
Nevada I considered Tony Romo a Hispanic. I might be wrong but for some reason I remember so info on thios board concerning his Grand parents being mestizio.
 

backrow

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Messages
7,363
Location
Spain
he's no more mestizo than Garcia... they are of SPANISH descent. so is Nadal, Fernando Alonso, Pau Gasol.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Hispanic is a white ethnic category, no different than being anglo, or scandinavian, or slavic. What we're really discussing is whether Romo is a mestizo or not. The question is the same for JP Losman, because his mother is from Mexico, but we don't know if she is white or mestizo.

Jeff Garcia is obviously white, there's no debate there. He is spanish and irish.

It's important to work these issues out, otherwise we are going to be stuck in nonsense land the way the US census is stuck in nonsense land, putting anybody with any connection to Spain into some new, made up racial category.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,454
Location
Pennsylvania
nevada said:
Hispanic is a white ethnic category, no different than being anglo, or scandinavian, or slavic. What we're really discussing is whether Romo is a mestizo or not. The question is the same for JP Losman, because his mother is from Mexico, but we don't know if she is white or mestizo.

Jeff Garcia is obviously white, there's no debate there. He is spanish and irish.

It's important to work these issues out, otherwise we are going to be stuck in nonsense land the way the US census is stuck in nonsense land, putting anybody with any connection to Spain into some new, made up racial category.


I agree with that. Categorizing all hispanics as a non-white grouping is akin to doing the same with "Americans," given that there are all sorts of races and racial mixtures in the U.S. Central andSouth Americahave many people of solely European descent, with some countries having a higher percentage of whites than the U.S.
 

ToughJ.Riggins

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
5,063
Location
Ontario Canada
Yeah Argentina is a very white country, so is Chile to a lesser extent I'm pretty sure. Few of those countries citizens have mestizo inheritance. And "very" few have African inheritance.
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
The issue of whether or not Hispanic people are white or a separate race has been debated on this board many times already. The problem is, whether they are racially white, black or something in between, most of them consider themselves to be a separate race, regardless of how others see them.
 
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
461
I looked back and found the post that I was remembering that made me think Romo was not white, after seeing it in cothe context of answering another post it was obviously in jest so I guess Romo is white.
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
Romo is half mexican on his dads side and german and polish form his ma's side.
 
G

Guest

Guest
How did this post evolve into what Mexican is and if your part Mexican are you white enough?

Here is the score. Mexican is a mixture of Spaniards and Native indegious people who occupied and built civilizations such as Mayan Kingdom and Aztec kingdom, before they were conquered by the Spaniards. Many Mexicans are a part Spanish(from Europe)and part native North American. Some may look more European or Indian depending on the dominate genes running through one's blood.

My father is Mexican(part Spainard and part native North American) my mom is half German/Irish. I look like Jeff Garcia. I consider myself American who looks white. I also identify with white culture. I consider myself to be white with a little Indian blood. Basically a white guy who tans great during the summer.
smiley36.gif
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,454
Location
Pennsylvania
I think we agree here in principle thateveryone roots for whoever theywant without putting any athlete through a "racial purity" test.


Personally, Romo looks to me about as white bread as they come.As Sport Historian has mentioned, Jim Plunkett and Tom Flores were regarded by the media as white quarterbacks a generation ago, not as hispanic or minority quarterbacks. The wholesale designation of "hispanics" as non-white by the power structure seems designed to confuse rather than elucidate. Big surprise there.


Alot of racially aware white Americans are pretty much clueless when it comes to the racial demographics of Central and South America and just how many whites live to our south, similar to how so many buy into the "black supremacy" myth in sports without stopping to investigate it.
 
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
461
Sorry if I offended anyone it was not intentional. But as this month is Latino history month at the Pro HOF website the NFL does consider Hispanics as a separate or semi separate group from other players of Euro heritage. Also I live in one of the states where immigration from South of Rio Grand has become a problem. Some of this Hispanics do not appear very European and perhaps I have an altered view of Hispanic because of this. Ironically enough half of my great grandparents were from Barcelona.
 

White_Savage

Mentor
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Texas
The important point is that Hispanics are either of White or White-AmerIndian stock. AmeriIndians are not considered uber-athletes, in fact, the "racial science" of some sports researches would imply that, if anything, Mongoloid peoples are somewhat inferior to Whites athletically, not that I buy into much of that terribly. Therefore there is zero justification for portraying Hispanics as physically superior to Whites. One can be assured that anything a Mestizo can accomplish in athletics, can also be done by Whites.

In the negrophile NFL, Mestizos (and Asians, if you can find any) should be included along with Whites in such studies as an underrepresented group whose performance nevertheless often equals or exceeds that of the "uber" Black affaletes.
 
Top