I agree his columns are different from most black sportswriters that play the race card frequently but I have read a lot of his columns and in the majority of the ones I've read he takes a bias stance. He's not very skilled in writing in the sense he'll take a shallow stance on an issue and then completely backtrack and his stance is, then, completely up in the air. He'll bash Adam Jones for being an idiot to get in trouble again but then he'll hint at the fact that Dallas police are eager to arrest Pacman jones based on his skin color (again playing the race card). His most recent column says Charlie Weis is not a better coach than Tyrone Willingham (a black coach) -- at the beginning of the article he says "I never bashed Notre Dame for firing Willingham" but immediately backtracks and says Notre Dame got what they deserved in firing Willingham and hiring Weis.
I think what we have in Jason Whitlock is a black writer who is trying to be edgy and "break the mold" and point out what blacks do wrong as well as whites...kind of what Bill Cosby did. But his bias is to strong and it comes out in his articles. His articles are bunch of different almost contradicting opinions thrown together and at the end you're wondering truly what Jason Whitlock really feels about the issue.
If Whitlock wants to be evolutionary he needs to take a solid stance on the matter, and point out the truth in the reverse discrimination going on in the NFL with whites being discriminated against without backtracking and saying "well blacks were slaves for a long time so thats what white people deserve.."
