Sir James Chadwick - the real intelligence behind nuclear physics

[Charles Martel]

Because ((( they))) have run the media for many decades now, people grow up thinking that Einstein and Oppenheimer were instrumental in the discovery of nuclear energy.

But the most important man behind the development of nuclear physics was a nearly-forgotten gentile named James Chadwick.

Other non-Jewish physicists such as England's John Cockcroft and Ireland's Ernest Walton were important on the development of nuclear physics, yet are rarely ever mentioned.

Credit should be given where it is due.

 

[Arerequired]

The theory of relativity has gotten similar treatment, as did the polio vaccine.

 

[SneakyQuick]

I’ve seen other things online alleging Einstein was a fraud but frankly my physics background isn’t nearly strong enough to say one way or the other.

if you check out the “ what really happened blog” he roasts Einstein pretty regularly

 

[Jerry Reb]

The theory of relativity has gotten similar treatment, as did the polio vaccine.

Considering all the crap going on now with the Covid vaccine that doesn't work, the fact that the polio vaccine actually worked is proof that it was not a purely Jewish invention.

The Covid vaccine, on the other hand...

 

[icsept]

Considering all the crap going on now with the Covid vaccine that doesn't work, the fact that the polio vaccine actually worked is proof that it was not a purely Jewish invention.

The Covid vaccine, on the other hand...

There e is actually legitimate debate about the efficacy of the polio vaccine. Polio was already on the decline before vaccine was introduced. Polio is attributable to the rampant use of DDT insecticide in the 1950s. They were spraying neighborhoods, swimming pools full of children, spraying children’s head for lice, etc.. A highly toxic substance causing birth defects in unborn children and neurological disorders in children. The theory is that polio is not caused by a virus, but from exposure to toxins. Therefore, the vaccine is useless.

Much like the ubiquitous tetanus vaccine which is pointless. Tetanus symptoms are caused by untreated, infected wounds, whether or not the specific Chlostridiun Tetani bacteria is present. Modern wound treatment and antibiotics prevent anyone from suffering the extreme symptoms such as “lock jaw” or other stiffening muscles. A vaccine cannot proctect you from a bacterial infected wound.

Vaccine science is very questionable. In fact, they have never publicly put a vaccine up to a double blind trial. Because they say it’s unethical to put the placebo group in danger of contracting the disease.

Bottom line is that vaccine science theorizes that man can improve and enhance on the Creator’s amazing immune system.

 

[Freethinker]

There e is actually legitimate debate about the efficacy of the polio vaccine. Polio was already on the decline before vaccine was introduced. Polio is attributable to the rampant use of DDT insecticide in the 1950s. They were spraying neighborhoods, swimming pools full of children, spraying children’s head for lice, etc.. A highly toxic substance causing birth defects in unborn children and neurological disorders in children. The theory is that polio is not caused by a virus, but from exposure to toxins. Therefore, the vaccine is useless.

Much like the ubiquitous tetanus vaccine which is pointless. Tetanus symptoms are caused by untreated, infected wounds, whether or not the specific Chlostridiun Tetani bacteria is present. Modern wound treatment and antibiotics prevent anyone from suffering the extreme symptoms such as “lock jaw” or other stiffening muscles. A vaccine cannot proctect you from a bacterial infected wound.

Vaccine science is very questionable. In fact, they have never publicly put a vaccine up to a double blind trial. Because they say it’s unethical to put the placebo group in danger of contracting the disease.

Bottom line is that vaccine science theorizes that man can improve and enhance on the Creator’s amazing immune situation.

Very good post. Some stuff I’ve heard before but you explained it very succinctly. These questions need to be legitimately debated. That is true science.