For those unaware, Werewolf is referring to “Indian Point Energy Center,†a nuclear power plant located in Buchanan, NY. According to the hallowed “official report,†Mohamed Atta allegedly piloted American Airlines Flight #11 into the North WTC Tower…but not before casually flying over this particular nuclear plant. As Werewolf mentioned, creating even a small leak in the reactor core (especially given the plant’s proximity to the Hudson River) would cause far more chaos to Jew York City than haphazardly ramming airplanes in the top tier of two skyscrapers.
But, of course, I can anticipate the simple rebuttal…“Well, those bloodthirsty A-Rab’s sought to annihilate the WTC because it is a major symbol of American corporate greed!â€
Assuming that this sensational act was indeed their “Muslim Master Plan†(you know, as opposed to the “Israeli Master Plan†of those who framed them)…well, I can surely identify with their sentiments. If only white men would find the requisite spinal column to commit such a disobedient act against their oppressors (a race war, for instance).
You all remember these ubiquitous photos of Mr. Atta, right? Yes, how could we forget?
It’s interesting to note that Atta’s father (a retired lawyer residing in Egypt) passionately refutes the notion that his son was involved in the 9-11 attacks whatsoever. He’s emphatically stated (in several interviews) that the Israeli terrorist organization, Mossad, in conjunction with the U.S. Z.0.G., the CIA, and the FBI have successfully framed his son. Atta’s father also claimed to have had a phone conversation with Atta on September 13, 2001. Atta’s father stated in 2002 that his son is currently in hiding…however, during a 2005 interview; Atta’s father stated that “My son is gone. He is now with God. The Mossad killed him.â€
For the record…I would absolutely believe Atta’s father over any “government official†representing the white-abhorring, goy-enslaving, corporate-media-manipulated, Yarmulke-piloted United States of Western Israel. Naturally, the complete and utter reverse of their “official opinion†is where the truth can always be located.
To be fair, both UA flight # 175 and AA flight #11 were large Boeing 767’s (both out of Boston, Massachusetts) heading on transcontinental flights to Los Angeles. I fully understand your point, though…I would have selected a pair of flights heading to Australia or New Zealand. But if the buildings were indeed already fitted with explosive charges (which, in the mysterious footage of WTC 7, appears to be the case), a few thousand more gallons of jet fuel makes little difference.
Thrashen -
That surveillance photo that you posted above, that's one of the phony photos they try to trot out purporting to show the "19 Arabs" at the 911 airports - except that surveillance photo was taken at Portland, Maine International Jetport. Why they flew all the way up to Maine just to come back down south again is just 911 anomaly #6,000,006. Makes no sense. And then, of course, they tell us that they conveniently left behind their Korans (the LAST thing a Moslem on a suicide mission would leave behind!) and a book in Arabic called "How To Fly A Plane" in a convenient place for the FBI to find it so that they could immediately know who they are. Yeah right.
In addition to the surveillance photo NOT being taken at a 911 airport, the ticket seller who sold them the tickets described them as being dressed in business suits not in casual attire as they are in the published photo.
The other photo of the alleged Arab hijackers was trotted out by Washington the same day they trotted out their 911 cover up commission report (even the commissioners themselves now say their commission was a cover up!!!). That phony photo was not even time date and location stamped as are all surveillance videos.
In fact there are no - zero none - airport surveillance photos of the "19 Arab hijackers", nor are there any boarding videos, nor are there any ticket receipts, Arab names on flight manifests or on that phony FBI Pentagon DNA report, metal detector checkpoint personnel testimony etc. Had it been real we would have been seeing the airport surveillance videos thousands of times on the tv news just as we have the WTC towers impact videos. And there would be THOUSANDS of airport surveillance stills of the Arab hijackers", because airports then as now were festooned with surveillance cams, all running at 24FPS. But there are NONE. And all of the 911 airports had their security operated by an ISRAELI company, as did the London Underground on 77 - and the surveillance cams there just happened not to be busted that day too!
Re Atta being alive post-911. The BBC - the same outfit that on 911 reported 7 WTC fell down almost 1/2 hour before it did! - also reported that about half of the "Arab hijackers" were alive and well AFTER 911. Of course this was never investigated by our free media or our government or our 911 commission either. "Our" should be in quotes.
The four hijacked planes had free run of the skies for almost two hours that day, totally unmolested by multi-trillion dollar NORAD, while President Bush dawdled away the morning blinking and smirking and chatting about pet goats at a publicly pre-announced photo op near an airport! And VP Cheney in the White House basement was barking out orders to DO NOTHING about the incoming hijacked plane (re Sec. Trans. Minetta), and this was after the WTC had been trashed! It wasn't until the action was all over that the skies over NYC and Washington filled with fighter planes.
You can see the flight paths of the allegedly hijacked aircraft on the following link. They were zigzagging all over the northeast USA, the most tightly guarded airspace in the world on the highest alert day in history, totally unmolested by NORAD. This like everything else in the official story makes zero sense because they knew they would have been intercepted by NORAD had it been real and they would have had to hijack planes at the nearest airport - Laguardia, Newark, JFK... - and with no absurd nonsense about telling the passengers to get in the back of the plane and call home (and by the way cell phones couldn't possibly have worked in those planes). They would have made a beeline straight at their targets and forget about scenic detours to Ohio and Kentucky and upstate NY.
Real hijackers would never in a million years tell the passengers to get together in the back of the plane and call home because they're about to die so they could form a desperate and cohesive mob. They would tell them to remain safely strapped in their seats and everything is going to be OK. But then Asscroft hs already admitted that the whole "let's roll!" scenario was BS. He admitted that the PA plane was SHOT DOWN, something we well know because the debris from that plane was strewn over eight miles of PA landscape and there is nothing at all in the hole where they tell us it crashed.
Flight paths of allegedly hijacked (but probably flown by remote control) 911 planes:
http://www.public-action.com/911/4flights.html
