Well Abo's in Australian team is logical (50 thousands years of being there..), Tongians in Australian team is geographically understandable, whites are one of the people who went to Australia few centuries ago, so multiple origins in Australian team isn't that bizarre
They've been here for 50,000 years? That's funny, as government-funded Aboriginal bull**** artists (sorry, "scholars") have always been fond of telling everyone that their, er, "people" have inhabited Australia for 40,000 years. Too bad that the Abos had failed to crawl out of the stone age during those 40 millennia - a fact which may have been a bonanza for 19th century anthropologists, but consitutes an everlasting boil on the arse of the modern taxpayer.
I just wonder how these deep-thinking Aboriginals came up with such a five-figure number all by themselves, given that their pre-European "invasion" numerical system consisted of "one" and "two" followed by a highly utilitarian "many", while their "languages" (all oral, of course, as writing is for White idiots) inexplicably failed to contain a word for "asymptote". Go figure, eh?
As for the proximity of Tonga to Australia, we are talking about something in the vicinity of 1800 nautical miles (or just over 3300 km) which is a greater distance than that which divides Dublin and Moscow - but the siren song of unemployment benefits and public housing
is very powerful indeed. By the same token, I guess that it's perfectly "geographically understandable" for French sports teams to be filled with Arabs and Berbers, as Algeria is about four times closer to France than Tonga is to Australia...
With all due respect, mate, You have probably never encountered any of our delightful natives - but if You ever do, You shall doubtlessly be far less sanguine about tolerating the sight of them running around on Your television screen wearing Wallabies jumpers. Why don't I wish to see Abos? The answer would appear to be completely self-evident, especially in a forum of this nature, but allow me to make things nice and unambiguous. Such primitive, unwashed sub-humans aren't
my people therefore i don't wish to see them degrading the colours of
my country - the same applies to Maoris, Tongans, Samoans and all the other flat-nosed dregs of the Pacific...
foobar75 said:
I'm actually OK with the Maori/Pacific Islander presence on the Aussie/New Zealand teams, for the reasons bk21 mentions. New Zealand, for instance, is about 15% Maori, the original inhabitants, and while the make-up of the national team shows a slight over-representation (when strictly speaking in terms population percentages), the players on the squad do not appear to be affirmative action beneficiaries. This is the exact opposite of what we have here in the US, where Whites have been ethnically cleansed from football and basketball for the most part. As long as the teams maintain a comfortable White majority, this is a vast improvement over what we have here. What I wouldn't give for a 65% White NFL, or 60% White NBA. Also, your NFL equivalent, the AFL (Aussie Rules Football) is still very much a White dominated league, based on all the matches I've seen recently.
Mate, maybe You wouldn't be as keen if Your cities were overrun by numerous representatives of this startlingly unintelligent vermin, whose participation in street crime and gangs is even higher than their disproportionate presence in rugby teams (as is their prodigious level of unemployment). Conversely, one doesn't see too many of these tattooed halfwits around centres of tertiary education or in any roles outside that of club bouncer or unskilled labourer. Maoris and Islanders are completely enamoured with the black "gangsta" hip-hop and r'n'b "culture" often aping (pardon the language...) Your very own Negro porch-dwellers to the point of unwitting parody.
The key part of Your statement was "what I wouldn't give for a 65% White NFL, or 60% White NBA". Like French soccer fans, You American lads are - understandably - so sick of watching Your own black-saturated sports that anything else appears lily White by comparison.
If You have been reading the stats I post in the soccer section, You shall be aware that the English Premier League
is about 60% White - which makes it nigh on unwatchable. A 60 - 65% White target may appear almost messianically alluring to the racially aware American fan but, to me and other racially aware Australians and Europeans, such proportions constitute a full-blown disaster...
:icon_lol:
I'd just like to conclude with a few words about the All Blacks (who have just massacred Japan, complete with their White and non-White imports, to the tune of 83 - 7). From the very first time that I saw them perform the
haka as a little kid, I was always mystified how White men could lower themselves to participate in such a ridiculaous spectacle, tongues hanging out of their mouths, eyes bugging out and knees bent as if they are trying to crap out a fist-sized ball of barbed wire. The only thing missing from this Maori garbage is a steamily bubbling cannibal cook pot in the background, complete with a protruding limb or two. Being Australian, it made me hate the All Blacks even more...
As for the numbers and role of Aboriginals in the AFL, have a quick squiz at the following link:
http://www.afl.com.au/indigenous community/tabid/14282/default.aspx
