Racial Snapshot of Champions League

[Europe]

Here is a partial snapshot of the final 16 of the Champions League.

Roma--Italy vs
Arsenal--England

6 Italians&nbs p;1 spanish
2 black Brazilians&n bsp;4 black "French"
2 white Brazilians&n bsp;2 black Africans
1 Black African&nbsp ;1 mixed English
1 Danish-Apple

1 Alegerian "french"
1 Montenegro 1 dutch
1 black brazilian from Croatia
1 black Brazilian from Brazil
1 danish

Barcalonavs& nbsp;Lyon

5 Spain& nbsp;4 french
3 black Africans 1 black french
1 Mexican 1 algerian french
1 Belarus&nbsp ;2 black african
1 Argentinian 1 italian
1 mixed French 3 brazil, not sure about race
1 black Brazil assume 2 black
1 white Brazil 1 swedish
1 argentinian

There are about 20 black players and 2 mixed out of the 54. 13 players are from South America and 8 from Africa. 1 from Mexico. 12 would be considerd minority Europeans--blacks, algerians etc. Only 22 players are real Europeans out of 54. This shows the takeover of European football at the biggest clubs. 4 English teams made the final 8, 2 spanish, 1 german ,1 portugal.

 

[Europe]

sorry about the alignment.

 

[j41181]

sorry about the alignment.

You could post the source link instead.

 

[Karl Baxter]

Thanks, Europe, this is the kind of thing we need to keep tabs on the colonization of our native sports.

I'd be interested to see the racial snapshot of the winning team, when that's finally decided.

Although the top TEAMS show an increased tendency towards "racial diversity" (a phenomenon caused by 'parachuting in' the best talent from around the world to the teams with the most money), I predict that the top TEAM will show a tendency towards more ethnic cohesion and Whiteness.

 

[StarWars]

Is the caste system prevalent in Europe too? If so to what extent?

 

[j41181]

Is the caste system prevalent in Europe too? If so to what extent?

Not as obvious compared in the USA, but it's obvious there is an aim for diversity and globalization in Europe. What the continent (white homeland) does not need at all.

Like what I said before, when you say diversity, it's only in White Majority countries.

 

[Karl Baxter]

Like what I said before, when you say diversity, it's only in White Majority countries.

When 'diversity' was practised in India and Africa in the 18th and 19th centuries, for some strange reason it was called 'colonization' and vehemently opposed both by the natives and many of the Whites back home.

 

[Europe]

Like what I said before, when you say diversity, it's only in White Majority countries.

When 'diversity' was practised in India and Africa in the 18th and 19th centuries, for some strange reason it was called 'colonization' and vehemently opposed both by the natives and many of the Whites back home.

I can't imagine why the "elites" of Europe and the US want to give their whole countries away and then bend over backwards to make sure they don't offend the people who are colonizing their country. At least in the past, the invaders had to fight and maybe die to take over a country, now they give the invaders free housing and healthcare, while the indigenous have to wait to get a council house in England.

Ben Franklin was complaing about how the German immigrants were changing the country. He wanted the US to stay English based. I'll see if I can find the link.

 

[Karl Baxter]

I can't imagine why the "elites" of Europe and the US want to give their whole countries away.

As you imply, the people currently in possesion of power and influence are no longer the elite. They are just the idiot temporarily at the steering wheel.

The real elites are people like you and me who know what's what and will act on it. Back in 1492, a bunch of Indian chiefs on the beach looking at some nice big canoes approaching the shores of America were the elite. In 1916, the Tzar and his cronies were the elite. In 1989, the apparatchiks of Eastern European Communist parties were the elite...

If history teaches anything, it's that elites change and when they do, it can be total and sudden.