Perhaps the most sickening racist of all.

W

White_Savage

Mentor
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Texas
Having nearly had an appolexy AND experienced physical sickness while readingthis article , I decided to share it with comrades, since misery loves company
smiley18.gif


Some samples for you.

"Personally, I've long wanted more black quarterbacks in the NFL. Living in Southern California, I don't have a team to root for. So I just watch the wrap-up shows to see amazing plays. And black quarterbacks provide more of them than whites, because they are generally faster and shiftier runners.

In contrast, most white quarterbacks just pass.

Thus I was saddened when Atlanta Falcons quarterback, Michael Vick, who might be the most amazing physical talent ever to play in the NFLâ€â€￾a runner who makes even McNabb look like poor Joe Namath after a half-dozen knee operationsâ€â€￾broke his leg in August."

And the end of his piece and his predictions for the future face of NFL quarterbacks makes me believe this man is quite possibly more damaging for the morale of the white race than 100 liberal whackos.
 
Wasn't that actually the columnist commenting, and not Rush. That's the way I read it, but I could be wrong. The way it was headed and then broken into who said what confused me as to who said/wrote the actual body of the article. Please help!
smiley5.gif
 
Reb: Yes, I meant Sailer's commentary, not Rush's brief comments, though El Rushbo would probably agree "off the record"
 
Those were Sailer's thoughts, not Rush's.
 
I can only hope that Rush wouldn't agree with such lunacy! This Sailer guy is a real nut-job. I'm glad I have never been exposed to his lies until now. I guess I should be fighting him tooth and nail though.
 
Most of Sailer's writing favors immigration restriction, or is film criticism. He's very tough on the neocons and the open-border types. Since Tom Brady has been the Super Bowl-winning QB in the two years since that column, Sailer wouldprobably agree that the old-fashioned white QB is most likely to take you to a championship.
 
SH:
He's supposedly in our camp, but his brand of racialism hurts more than it helps. I'll quote myself to explain why:

"Heres is a fact: If you "prove" to a healthy white male that his race is physically inferior (at least at athletic tests relevant to hunting and combat), then you just made 98% of them regret being White. God knows what it does to white females. If they buy into it, that is. No matter what statistics you bring up about relative intelligence or crime rates or whatever, it still destroys the morale of Whites

Racialists like Sailer therefore basically race traitors, whether they know it or not."
 
Yes, Sailer goes overboard on black superiority in sports. Sometimes he goes around in circles. For instance, he writes that white people are smarter with higher IQ's. At other times, he writes that blacks "think faster." How does he reconcile those two positions? Never has, as far as I know.
 
He makes blacks out to be a superior race. They think faster, run faster, blah blah blah.

I'm sick of it.
smiley11.gif
 
sport historian said:
For instance, he writes that white people are smarter with higher IQ's. At other times, he writes that blacks "think faster." How does he reconcile those two positions? Never has, as far as I know.
Click to expand...


Sport Historian,if ever there was a conundrum, this would be it. I don't have an answer for you butI'm sure Sailer does. He's probably discovered that genetically superior blacks also possess --fast twitch--brain cells.
 
Sailer: Further, blacks tend to enjoy advantages in "real time" responsivenessâ€â€￾hence black strengths in running with footballs and basketballs and in jazz, rap, dance, trash talking, preaching, and oratory.


I had to laugh reading that sentence. Blacks are even superior at preaching, oratory and trash talking?You mean to tell me when a black screamsat a white guy 'Yo momma be fat' the white stammers and stutters before blurting out 'No, you're entirely mistaken, my mother is relatively slender. In fact I would assume it is your mother who suffers from obesity.'


When all is said and done we find Sailer hascaused more harm than good.He merely confuses what is already plain. He reminds me of the devious character in old western movies whoshouts the loudest for a search party to catch the bad guys. The mob thinks he's with them and follow him out of town only to discover they've been led in the wrong direction allowing the crooks to get away. I wouldn't doubt he writes from the belly of a Trojan horse.
 
Before Shaka Zulu, blacks warred with each other by gathering in groups between 50 and 100 yards apart ,and they would send a single man out at a time to throw a spear at the opposing group. The battle wasn't won by killing the enemy ,but by who stood there and talked trash the longest while jumping around. I've also read that they would have sex right out in the open. They only used one position ,doggystyle. And they didn't kiss. That's probably why their women have such huge butts. That was their primary attractant. History is very telling about a people's nature. All that trash talking is only a defense mechanism. It masks fear. That concept is foreign to us. We ,white people, are capable of group violence that is much more organized , widespread and results in heavy casualty levels. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying blacks are noble savages who aren't capable of cutting up 10s of thousands of people with machettes like in Rwanda. I'm saying that we didn't take over or colonise every nation in the world with the exception of Japan by accident. They should fear the sleeping giant that is us, not the other way around. With a little solidarity, we are capable of doing what we please. Guys like Sailer don't get it. Edited by: KG2422
 
That post was hilarious and very fitting, KG. It's also very true. Thanks for the laughs.
smiley36.gif
 
As Sport Historian alluded to, Sailer can be thought-provoking when he writes about topics other than sports and race, where he is about a 90 percent believer in Caste System propaganda.

Here's several recent good articles:

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/050626_populism.htm
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/050619_obsession.htm
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/050612_blondes.htm
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/050807_darwin.htm

I believe all of these have been linked to on the ANU homepage.

As far as sports and race, look at it this way -- all the cutting edge writers on the subject are congregated right here at Caste Football, and there are quite a few of us now.
 
I didn't find that post very funny.

"We ,white people, are capable of group violence that is much
more organized , widespread and results in heavy casualty
levels." Yay!!!
 
GreatLakeState, I was responding to the constant attack by the media on white masculinity. It seems like we are the butt of every racial punchline. They try to portray us as less manly, by saying we can't jump, are slow, can't dance, fight , run fast, have smaller penises, and now we don't think as fast. I deny this. I say we are better lovers, fighters, athletes ,and thinkers. I think history proves this. That post was meant to illustrate black ineptness in comparison to whites in loving and fighting. We get so much of the blacks-are-better argument that there needs to be some realism injected into that fantasy. These Marxists deny history and observation as tools for understanding.
Edited by: KG2422
 
GreatLakeState:

None of us yet live in Utopia. The nature of the world we live in and the lessons of history make "Do the Hell Unto Others when they try to do unto you" a much more sensible golden rule of life. Things whites have done to others in the past do seem excessive and cruel to our soft modern eyes-then again, 'tis better to be the wolf than the deer.
 
Speaking of improvisation and real-time thinking, what sport can be called more creative and improvisational than MMA, which Whites dominate?
 
The history of the world is filled with violence, sad but true.But if it had not been for men like Charles Martel the white race may have gone the way of the dinosaur.We would not be conversing with each other on this forum if he and countless other white men like him failed tostand and fight against alien barbarians.We would not be enjoying the benefits of modern civilization if he had been defeated. For a very brief biographical sketch of this important man.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Martel
 
Not only was he a great warrior, but he was obviously commanding thousands of them in order prevail against numbers like that. We can defeat all comers if we regain just a little bit of a collectivist mentality and shed some of this materialistic individualism.
 
Our children should learn of all of the Charles Martel's of the past and not one MLK or Malcolm X.
 
Who, through history, have white men ended up killing most
often?

Other white men.
 
I'm sure the same can be said for black men and asians. What's your point?
 
Sailer is a Trojan Horse if there ever was one. He is an
afro-phile. He mentions racial differences but only mentions the
results of these differences if they favor blacks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
American Freedom News
Back
Top