Pacquiao vs Bradley

Dadgum! What time is this bout supposed to start? It's midnight here. :bored:
 
Afrolete Bradley by SD...BS. :icon_rolleyes:
 
Even by "drunk Nevada judges" decisions, this was BAD! This decision was up there with Chavez vs Whitaker and Lewis vs Holyfield I. I don't know where the corruption angle is though as Pacman is the cash cow in the fight and Bradley is still colourless and barely marketable, beyond a rematch....:thumbdown:
 
Dan Rafael scored it 119-109 for Pacquiao. I scored it 118-110 for Manny.

It was one of the worst robberies I've ever seen. I'm disgusted.
 
I just finished watching the fight now and that's the reason why I have stopped watching AMERICAN BOXING!

The Jews have ruined the sport, Pacquiao became a victim of the very long list of the foreign fighters who have suffered blatant robbery against an American Negro.


God bless the Eastern Euros, they make sure to knock those Negroes out, that's the only way to get a victory against Satan's chosen people protegees!
 
Helpful hint: Never bet money on ANYTHING in Las Vegas. The dump is gangster-run from top to bottom. How do you think the wise guys built all those giant glitzy casinos? By giving the suckers a fair break? By not fixing everything from slot machines to boxing matches?
 
Wow. I just found out about this. I was watching the stream and Pacquiao clearly won. I had BSPN's line-by-line analysis going on at the same time and, by the end, both had it for Pacquiao, one by a wide margin. I just went to bed thinking that the official score would be similar.

What a highway robbery. Unbelievable!

Could this have anything to do with Pacquiao's recent strong anti-Gay marriage statements and stance? We must not underestimate the power and control that the "chosen ones" have in this country along with their ancillary "rainbow coalition".

If this doesn't show everyone out there who really runs this country, then nothing will.
 
Last edited:
(from BSPN) Ringside punching statistics showed Pacquiao landing 253 punches to 159 for Bradley, who vowed before the fight to take the 147-pound title from Pacquiao. The Compubox statistics showed Pacquiao landing more punches in 10 of the 12 rounds.

Some interesting (and telling) quotes:

"Can you believe that? Unbelievable," Arum said. "I went over to Bradley before the decision and he said, `I tried hard but I couldn't beat the guy.' "

"He hurt me a couple of times with his left," Bradley said. "He's a beast."

"He never hurt me with his punches; most of them landed on my arms," Pacquiao said.


Then, notice Bradley goes into full TNB mode after the decision and contradicts his previous quotes:

"I thought I won the fight," Bradley said. "I didn't think he was as good as everyone says he was. I didn't feel his power."

"I'm going to make a lot of money on the rematch, but this was outrageous.", Bob Arum


And what does the stunned Pacquiao say?:
"I did my best," Pacquiao said. "I guess my best wasn't good enough."
 
Here's wigger Aaron Rodgers and his ebonics-fluent homeboy Greg Jenning's Twitter takes on it:

That is horrible. Unreal. Ridiculous. Stupid. Bogus. Etc.That fight wasn't close and I was pulling for Bradley.
— Aaron Rodgers

Just had dis crazy dream. N it was Bradley beating PAC. gotta turn da tv off n back on n make sure my television is working right. SMH. WOW!
— Greg Jennings
 
Highlander said:
(from BSPN) Ringside punching statistics showed Pacquiao landing 253 punches to 159 for Bradley, who vowed before the fight to take the 147-pound title from Pacquiao. The Compubox statistics showed Pacquiao landing more punches in 10 of the 12 rounds.

Some interesting (and telling) quotes:

"Can you believe that? Unbelievable," Arum said. "I went over to Bradley before the decision and he said, `I tried hard but I couldn't beat the guy.' "

"He hurt me a couple of times with his left," Bradley said. "He's a beast."

"He never hurt me with his punches; most of them landed on my arms," Pacquiao said.


Then, notice Bradley goes into full TNB mode after the decision and contradicts his previous quotes:

"I thought I won the fight," Bradley said. "I didn't think he was as good as everyone says he was. I didn't feel his power."

"I'm going to make a lot of money on the rematch, but this was outrageous.", Bob Arum


And what does the stunned Pacquiao say?:
"I did my best," Pacquiao said. "I guess my best wasn't good enough."
Click to expand...

I didn't watch the fight nor will I. I don't think I've seen a person yet on a boxing website that agreed with the decision. That's enough proof for me. Something needs to seriously be done with boxing because some of these decisions are just incredibly bad.
 
Highlander said:
Wow. I just found out about this. I was watching the stream and Pacquiao clearly won. I had BSPN's line-by-line analysis going on at the same time and, by the end, both had it for Pacquiao, one by a wide margin. I just went to bed thinking that the official score would be similar.

What a highway robbery. Unbelievable!

Could this have anything to do with Pacquiao's recent strong anti-Gay marriage statements and stance? We must not underestimate the power and control that the "chosen ones" have in this country along with their ancillary "rainbow coalition".

If this doesn't show everyone out there who really runs this country, then nothing will.
Click to expand...

Interesting theory. The Philippines is a very conservative country, where divorce is illegal and homosexual marriage won't be an "issue" any time soon like it is in the US of Gay.

But then again, I've often wondered why Pacquiao is so popular in the U.S., given that he's neither black nor American, the two characteristics usually needed for the CM hype machine of lies and illusions to go to work.
 
Fox Sports: 119-109 Manny Pacquiao.
Los Angeles Times: 117-111 Manny Pacquiao.
Guardian UK: 117-111 Manny Pacquiao.
ESPN (Dan Rafael): 119-109 Manny Pacquiao.
HBO (Harold Lederman): 119-109 Manny Pacquiao.
Fighthype.com: 116-112 Manny Pacquiao.
East Side Boxing: 118-110 Manny Pacquiao.
The Associated Press: 117-111 Manny Pacquiao.
Yahoo! Sports: 117-111 Manny Pacquiao.
Daily Telegraph: 117-111 Manny Pacquiao.
Primetime: 116-112 Manny Pacquiao.
ESPN (Michael Woods): 119-109 Manny Pacquiao
 
Last edited:
And Adelaide Byrd was not even a judge this time!

Not sure what to do about bad judging. Next time I doubt Manny will leave it to the judges.
 
Highlander said:
Here's wigger Aaron Rodgers and his ebonics-fluent homeboy Greg Jenning's Twitter takes on it:

That is horrible. Unreal. Ridiculous. Stupid. Bogus. Etc.That fight wasn't close and I was pulling for Bradley.
— Aaron Rodgers
Click to expand...

Rodgers is a "whigger" for pulling for an american born black over the phillipine Pacquiao? That's setting the whigger bar pretty low isn't it? I know the Pac-man has morphed into an honorary whiteman on this site for some reason (maybe because he isn't black) but I don't associate Pacquiao support with pro-whiteness. I doubt few others do either.
 
jaxvid said:
Rodgers is a "whigger" for pulling for an american born black over the phillipine Pacquiao? That's setting the whigger bar pretty low isn't it? I know the Pac-man has morphed into an honorary whiteman on this site for some reason (maybe because he isn't black) but I don't associate Pacquiao support with pro-whiteness. I doubt few others do either.
Click to expand...
Nah, Aaron was a wigger long before this fight ever took place. This just helps highlight that. I could care less whether a black is American-born or not. Genetics is genetics and knows no border or boundary. Same with TNB.

If he was fighting Ricky Hatton that would be a different story, but he wasn't. Culturally, considering his strong Catholic faith, traditional belief system, respect for others, musical tastes, etc. he is much "Whiter" and "pro-White" than many so-called "Whites" I see today. That, along with his tenacious, aggressive, and fearless fighting style, will cause me to root for him over some disrespectful, White-hating street-thug-turned-boxer any day of the week.
 
Just another reason for me to continue my twenty plus year boycott of this ridiculous "sport." The last fight I watched was when Gerry Cooney, towering over Michael Spinks, permitted him to throw about twenty punches in a row without attempting to even block them, let alone punch back.

This typically crooked decision is to be expected from a "sport" that has long had a reputation for fighters taking "dives" and thinly disguised mobsters in every corner. Any "sport" that permits a first degree murderer like Don King to become a "promoter" and make millions from it, cannot be taken seriously by intelligent people.

Pacquiao is an honorary "white" to all blacks. They would root for him over an actual white fighter, but they have grown to despise him because he is a competitor to Floyd Mayweather, the closest thing the boxing world has now to a black "star." If you think this decision was shady, just imagine what Pacquiao would have to do to win a decision against Mayweather. That fight will probably never happen, but if it does Pacquaio will have to knock him out to win.
 
Just saw Stephen A. Smith, of all people, blast the decision and basically call boxing fixed. He said what should be obvious to everyone; that this was all done to create a lucrative rematch.

Of course, he missed the racial element....
 
dempseyfire said:
Fox Sports: 109-119 Manny Pacquiao. ...
Click to expand...


I think that first one is atypo, DF. Should read:

Fox Sports 119-109 Manny Pacquiao




Hey, at least we didn't pay the boxing mobs to watch this bit of corrupion. That was one choppy stream though.
 
Today's edition of Las Vegas's daily rag has this quote from judge Duane Ford: "I thought Bradley gave Pacquiao a boxing lesson. I thought a lot of the rounds were close. Pacquiao missed a lot of punches and I thought he was throwing wildly."

There's an article on the fight on the front page and two more in the sports section. The theme is that though the decision was controversial, it's no big deal. In fact sports page columnist Ron Kantowski ends his puff piece with this: "The next time probably will be in November, at the rematch, and everybody will be talking about it, and a lot of people will cough up $54.95 to watch it on pay per view though the economy stinks, though they say they've had it with boxing. That is why boxing shold be sending [judges] C.J. Ross and Duane Ford and Jerry Roth flowers."

Kantowski spends much of his article comparing the decision to many other famous bad calls, such as umpire Jim Joyce costing Armando Galarraga a perfect game, or Don Denkinger's blown call in the 1985 World Series, Michael Jordan pushing off on Bryon Russell, 12 year old Jeffrey Maier reaching over the fence to catch a fly ball before the Orioles right fielder could catch it, etc. But those were all single, split-second incidents, not a case of two judges watching a 12 round fight and getting it incredibly wrong. Big difference. But then again, the Vegas media cheerleads for the local and national establishment all the time, similar to the media in all big cities.

One very telling tidbit from today's sports page about just how atrocious the decision was: on live wagering, Bradley was at 100 to 1 odds to win going into the 12th round.
 
Has anyone watched significant fights of Bradley? I've never seen him fight but today at work even the blacks were saying he's very ordinary, average speed and nothing exciting. I haven't talked to a person yet that thinks he won that fight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
American Freedom News
Back
Top