OC football
Guru
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2006
- Messages
- 349
MLB IS 60% WHITE
Exactly the same demographics as last year. There are 307 minorities in Major League Baseball and 458 whites. This according to MLB.com. Check for yourself. Check "team sites" then proceed to "depth charts".
For the purpose of this survey I included only players whom are both listed on the depth charts and also considered "active" by the teams web-site. Minor League prospects and "non-active" players were not counted.
I was very careful in conducting this servey. I always gave the minority demographic the benefit of the doubt. For instance, the likes of John Damond and Nick Swisher were not considered white. As a matter of fact, quite a few players with a Enlish/German or Irish last name were not considered white if I felt that there was any doubt at all as to their heritage. I counted most Italians as white, but not all. Italians Americans such as Piazza, Biggio, and Giambi were considered white but La-Duca was not. A very-very small number of players with a Spanish surname were considered white. Mark Teixeira, for example, was considered white only because I couldn't legitimize considering him otherwise. Such players as Eric Chavez, however, were not considered white. I probable only included 5 or 6 Spanish players as white.
This survey contends that 60% of MLB is white but whites may enjoy better representation then that. This being because the majority of Hispanics in Major League Baseball seem to be of prodominantly Spanish extraction. The general Hispanic - American population, by constrast, seems to be of stronger Ameridian decent.
It is also noteworthy that there are a good number of African - Hispanics in MLB as well. Also, the Asian presence in MLB seems to be on the rise.
A disproportionate number of white players are pitchers. Likewise, we can expect that most field players will be non - white.
CHECK MY WORK AT MLB.com
(whites vs non whites)
Twins: 15/7
White Sox: 16/7
Angels: 11/14
A's: 18/8
Mariners: 10/13
Rangers: 11/6
Braves: 20/8
Marlins: 12/10
Mets: 12/20
Pillies: 16/10
Nationals: 15/13
Astros: 19/4
Brewers: 14/12
Cardinals: 20/5
Baltimore: 17/6
Devil Rays: 14/10
Blue Jays: 18/6
Red Sox: 16/12
Yankees: 13/11
Indians: 19/9
Royals: 17/11
Tigers: 12/14
Cubs: 15/11
Pirats: 17/11
Reds: 15/9
Diamondbacks: 15/11
Dodgers: 12/16
Giants: 11/15
Padres: 21/5
Rockies: 13/17
Notice that the number of total players is not constant. This will be the case all season long. MLB teams can carry a total of 40 players on their roster, some may be active, others not. Had I used the 40 man rosters, as opposed to the depth carts, then the white percentage of players would have been higher. This being because the 40 man rosters tend to include a greater number of pitchers. 40 man rosters are inacurate becasue they include inactive players who probable will not even suit up. Edited by: OC football
Exactly the same demographics as last year. There are 307 minorities in Major League Baseball and 458 whites. This according to MLB.com. Check for yourself. Check "team sites" then proceed to "depth charts".
For the purpose of this survey I included only players whom are both listed on the depth charts and also considered "active" by the teams web-site. Minor League prospects and "non-active" players were not counted.
I was very careful in conducting this servey. I always gave the minority demographic the benefit of the doubt. For instance, the likes of John Damond and Nick Swisher were not considered white. As a matter of fact, quite a few players with a Enlish/German or Irish last name were not considered white if I felt that there was any doubt at all as to their heritage. I counted most Italians as white, but not all. Italians Americans such as Piazza, Biggio, and Giambi were considered white but La-Duca was not. A very-very small number of players with a Spanish surname were considered white. Mark Teixeira, for example, was considered white only because I couldn't legitimize considering him otherwise. Such players as Eric Chavez, however, were not considered white. I probable only included 5 or 6 Spanish players as white.
This survey contends that 60% of MLB is white but whites may enjoy better representation then that. This being because the majority of Hispanics in Major League Baseball seem to be of prodominantly Spanish extraction. The general Hispanic - American population, by constrast, seems to be of stronger Ameridian decent.
It is also noteworthy that there are a good number of African - Hispanics in MLB as well. Also, the Asian presence in MLB seems to be on the rise.
A disproportionate number of white players are pitchers. Likewise, we can expect that most field players will be non - white.
CHECK MY WORK AT MLB.com
(whites vs non whites)
Twins: 15/7
White Sox: 16/7
Angels: 11/14
A's: 18/8
Mariners: 10/13
Rangers: 11/6
Braves: 20/8
Marlins: 12/10
Mets: 12/20
Pillies: 16/10
Nationals: 15/13
Astros: 19/4
Brewers: 14/12
Cardinals: 20/5
Baltimore: 17/6
Devil Rays: 14/10
Blue Jays: 18/6
Red Sox: 16/12
Yankees: 13/11
Indians: 19/9
Royals: 17/11
Tigers: 12/14
Cubs: 15/11
Pirats: 17/11
Reds: 15/9
Diamondbacks: 15/11
Dodgers: 12/16
Giants: 11/15
Padres: 21/5
Rockies: 13/17
Notice that the number of total players is not constant. This will be the case all season long. MLB teams can carry a total of 40 players on their roster, some may be active, others not. Had I used the 40 man rosters, as opposed to the depth carts, then the white percentage of players would have been higher. This being because the 40 man rosters tend to include a greater number of pitchers. 40 man rosters are inacurate becasue they include inactive players who probable will not even suit up. Edited by: OC football