Michael Vick case causing racial tension?

Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
313
Location
New Jersey
A disgusting article for your viewing pleasure.


RICHMOND, Va. - The difference between those sporting Michael Vick jerseys and those urging his swift conviction on dogfighting charges is glaring: Vick's supporters are mostly black; his critics are mostly white.

The racial divide emerged early in the case against the Atlanta Falcons quarterback, apparent at rallies filled with cheering _ and overwhelmingly black _ Vick supporters and at anti-Vick protests that are noticeably white.

Vick's opponents say the evidence against him is overwhelming. For many black supporters, that judgment evokes uncomfortable questions about race and guilt in America.

"White folks 'been grindin' on an ax ... and that ax ain't got sharp enough for them," said Earnest Hardy Sr., who called the case a witch hunt targeting a successful black man.

Hardy's Surry County home borders Vick's property, where an April raid turned up evidence of dogfighting. Federal authorities indicted Vick on dogfighting charges, and he faces jail time and fines. He has pleaded not guilty.

In the rural county split 50-50 between whites and blacks, the case quickly took a racial bent. At the county courthouse, angry letters urged that whites "take back their town." Critics accuse the commonwealth's attorney, Gerald Poindexter, of stalling an investigation to protect one of his own.

"The only thing I'm doing is protecting my personal integrity and protecting the integrity of the office," said Poindexter, who is black. "I'm not going to be pushed into bringing charges that won't stand."

Hardy spotted Surry's racial divisions long ago _ in the farmland developers are sweeping up and selling at prices working-class folks can't afford, and in the new neighbors who don't look like him.

Hardy suspects that Vick _ famous, rich and black _ is just the fall guy behind bigger issues.

"A hundred-million-dollar black man?" he huffed. "They can't stand it."

His view is reflected from the Newport News region where Vick was raised to Atlanta, where a rally supporting the former Virginia Tech standout drew several hundred fans, but barely 50 whites, said Gerald Rose, with Atlanta-based New Order National Human Rights Organization.

Rose said the outcry stems from what he said is Vick's premature conviction in the media _ not support for dogfighting. But he said the case also awakens anger over a perceived smear campaign targeting famous black men from Kobe Bryant to Michael Jackson.

He argues black men who stumble draw excessive scrutiny and especially harsh public judgment.

"It's been too many cases involving African-Americans (where) they got through the court of law, they've been found not guilty, but damage has been done," Rose said.

Vick and two co-defendants are scheduled to stand trial Nov. 26. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference plans to recognize Vick at its annual convention, which began Friday in Atlanta.

"We're in support of Michael as a human being," SCLC president Charles Steele said. "Right now, he's feeling discarded, ostracized by people who are rushing to judgment. It's our responsibility to save him."

Tempers flared at Vick's July 26 arraignment in Richmond, where outside the courthouse blacks and whites debated everything from animal rights to slavery.

"It's racial profiling," said Bill Brown, a Richmond store owner who held a sign urging Vick's fair treatment. "We're always trying to brush everything up under the rug when it comes to racial things."

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, leader of the most vocal Vick protests, says the issue isn't racial.

"We're reacting very strongly to this case because Michael Vick is someone who's a hero ... If this were Peyton Manning or Brett Favre, we'd be out there," spokesman Dan Shannon said.

Both NFL quarterbacks are white.

Vick's case is a "crack in the dam" of American racial tension, explained Jeff Menzise, assistant director of the Race Relations Institute at Fisk University in Tennessee.

Whites, he said, may have underlying anger at blacks they feel constantly play the race card. Blacks, meanwhile, may feel whites rush to judge black suspects, but are more lenient to white ones, Menzise said. A case like Vick's offers a vent for those frustrations.

"When you dam up a river, any crack in that dam and every drop of water is going to try and get out," he said.

Menzise said blacks may despise dogfighting but support Vick as a figure of black success in a society in which there are relatively few.

At his Richmond clothing store, Brown said he'll continue stocking Vick merchandise, though others have pulled it from shelves. He likened black support for Vick's cause to the support for O.J. Simpson's acquittal.

"Black people didn't care about O.J.," he said. "But we felt like we finally won."Edited by: InfamousOne
 

Tom Iron

Mentor
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
1,597
Location
New Jersey
I think the aritcle is pretty open and up front. Blacks wouldn't care if Vick had sex with the dogs and then had drowned them. Everything in their putrid little lives is about hating White people.

It's my view that the "jury" will be packed with blacks and then he'll be found "innocent." No need to give this story anymore thought. End of story.

Tom Iron...
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
This is the typical chip-on-the-shoulder response from race-card utilizing "African Americans". For the many blacks with this mentality, this is their automatic position/defense....it's a racially motivated "attack". They cannot be bothered with the facts/details and instead proceed directly into race-card mode. This mentality speaks volumes in itself.Edited by: DixieDestroyer
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
I believe that the race-card first mentality is worse now than it's ever been. It used to take a few days or even weeks for someone to bring it up, but now it is the first line of defense, and as you said, is alleged regardless of the actual facts of the case.

And it's only going to get worse.
 

JoeV

Guru
Joined
Jun 29, 2005
Messages
432
Location
Ohio
When I saw on the news that the NAACP president of the ATL said something to the effect of don't judge him, and some other gay civil rights organization is actually giving him an AWARD. I thought to myself here we go again! Where were these a-holes when that d!ck Nifong was falsely accusing the Duke LAX players of crimes of the highest order? Oh that's right, they were judging them before the trial. F--k YA FACE! Vick is a total and complete POS, and I hope they throw the book at him and he gets the max. And no it's not because he is black, unlike those racist pigs who automatically wanted certain Duke players to admit something they didn't do just because of their race. Sh!t like this really tilts my boat.Edited by: JoeV
 

Charlie

Guru
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
354
This is good because it brings to the surface things whites don't want to think about. I remember everyone at the factory I once worked at going to the lunchroom to listen to the O.J. verdict. The women had very pained looks after the verdict. The way women look when they're really afraid. And these were pretty tough ethnic women.

They know blacks are violent, especially to women.

And dogs. Any living creature that can't effectively fight back. Another NFL multi-millionaire on a killing spree.

But aren't blacks kindly and gentle? We all 'know' a black will be our best friend and ally in tough times. We see it in movies. The white guy or gal sent to prison will be assisted by a kindly black. The black will see that the widowed and orphaned will be provided for. Even God Almighty is black.

So the more that blacks get loud about this case the more impact it will have on the minds of whites. Especially on those who consider themselves liberal and progressive. You can love blacks or you can love domestic animals, not both.

And it might bleed into the illegal immigration issue. The media here has issued several warnings about keeping a close eye on Bowzer because Mexican dog fighting rings will kidnap and use him as bait to excite fighting dogs.Just throw him in the ring and have the pit bulls kill him. And Mexicans suck at football.
 

C Darwin

Mentor
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
1,181
Location
New York
ESPN just told me that I should wait for the verdict of Ron Mexico before I pass judgment. It would be wrong to jump to conclusions like the media did with the four victims from Duke. But will ESPN paint Vick as a rich, privileged snob with endless resources like they did with the boys from Duke?

They are just wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2004
Messages
2,986
In the O.J. Simpson Trial, the black racialists were backing Simpson, while the (white) feminists were against him. By contrast, the Duke Hoax had the black racialists and the feminists allied against the Duke LAX players.

The Vick case may have the black racialists against the PETA crowd. Like the Simpson case, two liberal groups would be opposed. It's early yet. Vick's advisers may get a deal where Vick pays a fine with an apology, and is allowed to play again. Would Vick then be damaged goods to corporate advertisers?
 
Top