Michael Irvin fired!!!

RedBeard

Newbie
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Messages
25
Location
Pennsylvania
All I can say is thank you. I couldn't believe that this guy lasted three years on the air.
smiley11.gif


http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2769871

NFL analyst Michael Irvin no longer with ESPN

ESPN announced that Michael Irvin, who had been an NFL analyst for ESPN since 2003, is no longer with the network.

ESPN Communications Vice President Josh Krulewitz issued a statement, saying "We thank Michael for his contributions to ESPN and wish him well."

Irvin retired in 2002 after 12 seasons with the Dallas Cowboys and was elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame during Super Bowl festivities two weeks ago.
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
I wonder why. The article is way short on details.

Maybe he was offered a coaching job for the Cowboys.
smiley5.gif
smiley36.gif


I certainly won't miss his irritatingly grating voice, or his idiotic commentary, that's for sure.
 

Poacher

Mentor
Joined
Jul 30, 2005
Messages
943
Let's see who his replacement is.
 

xc1427

Newbie
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
56
Poacher said:
Let's see who his replacement is.

A salient observation. Let's see what in the hell ESPN does. Will they show some unusual guts (we all know what that means) or will they hire someone else who can hardly communicate. (i.e. Shannon Sharpe--ARGH!!!)
 

LabMan

Mentor
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
644
Location
Pennsylvania
Cutty,
espn kept him on for three years,to make sure the WE got the message,that street thug,ebonically challenged,ex-criminals are glorified in todays culture.
 

white is right

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
10,179
LabMan said:
Cutty,
espn kept him on for three years,to make sure the WE got the message,that street thug,ebonically challenged,ex-criminals are glorified in todays culture.
I don't think he is a street thug. He is more of comedic buffoon in the James Brown mode....
smiley36.gif
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
white is right said:
LabMan said:
Cutty,
espn kept him on for three years,to make sure the WE got the message,that street thug,ebonically challenged,ex-criminals are glorified in todays culture.
I don't think he is a street thug. He is more of comedic buffoon in the James Brown mode....
smiley36.gif

Well, at least you're not arguing the point that he is an ebonically challenged ex-criminal.
smiley36.gif


He did go through a lot of coke and prostitutes, though.
 

C Darwin

Mentor
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
1,181
Location
New York
ESPN's Irvin decision wrong
By Jennifer Floyd Engel
Star-Telegram Staff Writer

Full disclosure: I receive a paycheck from the Worldwide Leader for
radio duties. So I hope my ESPN brethren can handle a little
constructive criticism from a family member.

Mickey, you screwed up this Michael Irvin decision.

ESPN and Irvin confirmed Saturday that he would not be with the
network next season. Both were doing a good job of painting this as
an amicable parting of ways. Irvin had a one-year deal with an
option for three more.

ESPN opted out. It is their right. I just think they are wrong.

Irvin was a big reason why Sunday NFL Countdown and Monday
night NFL Countdown were must-see TV. He was funny and biased
and controversial and, most of all, dialed in. He was just about
everything a football fan wants from a pregame show.

Is he biased toward particular players? Obviously.

Does Irvin say crazy, non-PC stuff? Of course.

Did he go too far with his comments about Tony Romo and his
great-great grandmother's dating habits? Most definitely.

But admit it, you tuned in. I definitely did. And I guarantee I am not
the only one who TiVo-ed ESPN before church so as not to miss
whatever crazy debate Irvin and Tom Jackson might engage in and to
see Irvin try to look good in purple velour.

Half the time, I thought he was wrong. The percentage jumped to 85
when the subject was T.O. What Irvin did best was taking average
fans into players' brains, how they talk and what they feel and why
they do what they do.

ESPN will be fine, of course. Word is former Cowboys coach Bill
Parcells is taking Irvin's place with Chris Berman and Co., thus
preventing my TiVo from taking Sundays off.

Of course, Parcells taking Irvin's job, when Irvin and his little buddy
T.O. were at least partially responsible for Parcells being available, is
proof the karma train eventually reaches every station.

Not that Irvin will be unemployed for long. He was not simply
sunshine-pumping when he told S-T beat man Clarence E. Hill Jr. on
Saturday that "these are exciting times for me and my family. There
are a lot of opportunities to explore."


If CBS is smart, a spot in its very "ish" pregame show will be one of
the offers Irvin is contemplating. And it will be an offer teeming with
zeros and virtually impossible to refuse.

Because, of the four big NFL shows, CBS is seventh. Behind even the
p.r. machine that is The NFL Network.

To say Boomer Esiason, Shannon Sharpe, Dan Marino and James
Brown lack chemistry and fire is a gross understatement. They are
Must-Not-See TV. They are flip-between-Fox-or-ESPN-and-switch-
just-in-time-for-the-game boring. They underwhelmed during the
Super Bowl, but...

Whoever is running the show at CBS took a step toward watchability
by bringing former Steelers coach Bill Cowher and his jaw in for
Sunday brunch. Adding Irvin would be another giant leap toward
changing viewing habits.


What CBS has to ask itself is, "Do we want the Charles Barkley of the
NFL and all that implies?"

Because there will be days when The Playmaker drives you crazy,
days when he makes you wish you had brought in somebody who
followed the script, days when he says something so shocking that
everybody buzzes about him. And you. And not necessarily in a
good way.

ESPN decided it did not need the headache.

Full disclosure again: I enjoy working for the Worldwide Leader. So I
usually agree with every wonderful thing Brother Mickey does. But in
regard to Irvin, I think he went Goofy.

Jennifer Floyd Engel can be heard weekdays 9 a.m.-noon on The
Little Ball of Hate Show on ESPN/103.3 FM.

White women under the conrol of ESPN to the rescue!



Article
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,565
Location
Pennsylvania
Note to white athletes -- make sure you're arrested for multiple crimes, speak English so poorly that it's often not clear what you're saying, and dress like a clown, and you too can become a highly paid ESPN personality.


After all, it's just part of that "white skin privilege" you have that always gives you an advantage over non-whites in employment situations, both on and off the field of play.
smiley29.gif
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
C Darwin said:
He was funny and biased
and controversial and, most of all, dialed in. He was just about
everything a football fan wants from a pregame show.

Is he biased toward particular players? Obviously.

Does Irvin say crazy, non-PC stuff? Of course.

Did he go too far with his comments about Tony Romo and his
great-great grandmother's dating habits? Most definitely.

But admit it, you tuned in. I definitely did. And I guarantee I am not
the only one who TiVo-ed ESPN before church so as not to miss
whatever crazy debate Irvin and Tom Jackson might engage in and to
see Irvin try to look good in purple velour.
Article





How many whites like that would even be allowed airtime, let alone a job for 3 years? NONE!
smiley7.gif
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
To say Boomer Esiason, Shannon Sharpe, Dan Marino and James Brown lack chemistry and fire is a gross understatement. They are Must-Not-See TV. They are flip-between-Fox-or-ESPN-and-switch-just-in-time-for-the-gam e boring. They underwhelmed during the Super Bowl, but...

Oddly enough, the pre-game show with Esiason, Marino, Brown, and Sharpe is the only one I would even want to watch, and that only rarely. If they dump Sharpe it would be even better. Signing Cowher is not a good thing, and it would be even worse to bring another marble-mouthed Ebonics speaker on the show to boot.
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
Here is the email I sent to Ms. Engel.

White Shogun said:
Dear Ms. Engel
I am writing to inform you that I agree with ESPN's decision to release Michael Irvin.

I found Irvin's commentary decidedly unfunny, inane, and rude. Not to mention that he has one of the most irritatingly nasal voices ever found on the radio. Irvin is far too full of himself, regardless of his accomplishments in the NFL. His criminal record and comments about Tony Romo's heritage alone would have been enough to get any other commentator fired.

I happen to prefer the CBS program with Marino, Brown, Sharpe, and Esiason over any other pre-game show. Adding Irvin in the mix will only make me turn the channel, not tune in. Who would he replace? Do you really want Shannon Sharpe and Michael Irvin on the same program? No one would ever get a word in over those two ego-maniac loud mouths.

I say good riddance and Cheers to ESPN for ridding us of Michael Irvin's nauseating presence. I only hope this includes dropping him from the Dan Patrick show as well.

Good day, Ms. Engel.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
Good stuff Shogun!
smiley32.gif
 

whiteCB

Master
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
2,282
That article above makes me want to puke. ESPN did what they should have done a long time ago.
 

fightthepower

Newbie
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
26
Finally! I have been emailing the JB CASH article about Irvin to ESPN almost daily telling them to fire the reggin. I like to think my emails had something to do with his firing!!! These liberal freaks need to be called out on their stupidity. Heres their email address for everyone to use in the future: askespntv@espn.com
FTP
 

Deus Vult

Mentor
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
648
Location
Louisiana
C Darwin said:
What Irvin did best was taking average
fans into players' brains, how they talk and what they feel and why
they do what they do.


Michael Irvin did not pull punches. I loved his spat with Keyshawn Johnson, which began when Irvin said Keyshawn was not a top receiver. There is much to dislike about Michael Irvin. And even though I hardly ever agreed with him, his lowbrow honesty was a welcome change from all the scripted coach-speak and Bermanesque "I don't see race" nonsense.Edited by: Deus Vult
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
Irvin is simply too inarticulate to be a television or radio personality, whether he is honest or funny or whatever. You spend half your time trying to decipher what he is saying, and the other half, shocked that they let him get away with saying the things he did.
 

Deus Vult

Mentor
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
648
Location
Louisiana
White Shogun said:
Irvin is simply too inarticulate to be a television or radio personality, whether he is honest or funny or whatever. You spend half your time trying to decipher what he is saying, and the other half, shocked that they let him get away with saying the things he did.

I find far more irritating the nearly-articulate former affaletes like Robert Smith and Quadre Ishmael, both ESPN commentators. Smith is a self-absorbed jerk, and Quadre is just plain weird.

No, serve my blacks up as black as possible. I don't want blacks who act white any more than I like whites who behave and speak as blacks do.
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
Deus Vult said:
White Shogun said:
Irvin is simply too inarticulate to be a television or radio personality, whether he is honest or funny or whatever. You spend half your time trying to decipher what he is saying, and the other half, shocked that they let him get away with saying the things he did.

I find far more irritating the nearly-articulate former affaletes like Robert Smith and Quadre Ishmael, both ESPN commentators. Smith is a self-absorbed jerk, and Quadre is just plain weird.

No, serve my blacks up as black as possible. I don't want blacks who act white any more than I like whites who behave and speak as blacks do.

I guess we're poles apart in that regard. I don't think there is such a thing as 'acting white.' White behavior is civilized behavior, and the more people who behave in such a manner, the better - regardless of race.

Especially while I have to live among them.
Edited by: White Shogun
 
Top