Klitschko Sued by Brain-Damaged Magomed Abdusalamov Raises Questions of Negligence and Responsibility
                                                                                                 By Bryanna Fissori
 Boxing Champion Wladimir Kilschko is being sued in a controversial  case of severe brain damage. He is joined in the case by five ringside  medical doctors.
 On November 2, 2013 Magomed Abdusalamov sustained a devastating loss  to Mike Perez. The promotion hosting the bout was K2 Boxing, which is  owned by Kilschko. During the bout Abdusalamov suffered a broken jaw and  hand, and after 10 rounds he subsequently fell into a two week long  coma, had several seizures and had to undergo surgery to have a blood  clot removed in his brain. Doctors are predicting that the boxer may  never walk or talk again.
 Responsible Parties
 In March 2014 a lawsuit was filed by Abdusalamov’s wife claiming her  husband’s condition is the result of reckless, gross negligence and  medical malpractice. She has brought a cause of action against  Kiltschko, K2 Boxing Promotions, The State of New York, the New York  Athletic Commission’s five athletic commission doctors. The New York  State Athletic Commission cannot be sued directly because it is immune  under specific legislation, though it’s employees are not. The sum of  the suit, which was filed in March, equals approximately $100 million.  Kiltschko involvement is publically a recent addition to the list of  defendants.
 Injuries are expected in any combat sport. In fact injury is the  ultimate goal. Abdusalamov’s family is contending that the injuries  sustained by the boxer were excessive and preventable by reasonable  discretion of the doctors and promotion to the degree that their actions  constitute negligence and malpractice.  
 What Happened That Night
 The first round of the fight Abdusalamov was hit by his opponent’s  forearm, which caused his nose to break. The illegal blow could have  constituted a no-contest ruling immediately, but did not. It was evident  by the seventh round that Abdusalamov’s face was visibly disfigured by a  broken jaw. Doctors as well as the referees and the boxer’s trainer  allowed him to continue the fight.
 During the post-fight exam Abdusalamov conveyed that his head hurt  (though this is not an uncommon claim post-fight). It was confirmed that  he had broken his jaw, nose and hand. He also had to have a cut above  his eye sutured. Doctors recommended he have his injuries addressed  within a day or two of returning home. Abdusalamov resided in Florida.  After the doctors cleared the fighter, a state athletic commission  inspector noticed blood in Abdusalamov’s urine sample, which he  recognized as a sign of possible internal bleeding. He advised the boxer  to go to the hospital. Though two ambulances were on site, he and his  trainers were advised to take a taxi. It turns out his brain was  bleeding.
 Legal Grounds
 The case has been fairly inactive since it’s filing in March as the  family awaits the results of an investigation being conducted by the  athletic commission.
 Wladimir Kilschko’s part in this whole mess pertains to his  responsibility as the promoter of the event. He has already attempted to  involve his insurance company, but they have stated that their policy  contract expressly excludes injuries sustained during boxing matches.  Injuries are a virtual guarantee. That being said, the debate is going  to center around whether or not all the people named in the suit acted  reasonably given the circumstances. If not, this is where claims of  negligence and malpractice may be validated.
 In order to obtain judgment against Kilschko, Abdusalamov’s attorney  will have to prove that it was within Kischko’s legal responsibility, or  the responsibility of the promotion to take action to ensure the  boxer’s well being given the circumstances. On the face of the argument  one would assume most of this responsibility would fall on medical  professionals in charge of the fighters, but the terms of the  promotional agreement could potentially bare other standards.
 Brain Damage Precedents
 A somewhat similar case was filed in 2008 by the family of a  12-year-old boy in Lansing, Michigan who suffered a subdural hematoma  and subsequent coma as the result of injuries during a boxing match. No  ambulance was provided. The boxing club named in the lawsuit decided to  settle rather than litigate.
 Because most brain damage sustained by combat sports athletes is over  the long term of their career and not an isolated incident, there are  few lawsuits to stand as precedent.
 Many promotions ensure that their competitors agree in writing that  the sport is an, “inherently and abnormally dangerous activity,†which  gives rise to many health risks including “irreversible neurological  trauma.â€
 Even express language such as this can fall subject to legal  disputes. Many courts are hard-pressed to enforce liability waivers if  there is an act of negligence involved, the fine print is hidden, or the  signing party was not made fully aware of the potential risks involved.
 In November 2013 the National Football League (NFL) paid out  $765  million in a lawsuit which alleged that the organization hid evidence  supporting the high risks associated with repetitive brain trauma. The  litigation was filed in January of 2012 and encompassed over 4000,  plaintiffs, many of who sustained repeated head injuries during their  careers and are now suffering from mental illness.
 Assumption of Risk
 Boxing is obviously a dangerous sport and statistics for brain damage  are all over the map. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons  reported that 90 percent of boxers suffer some kind form brain injury  while competing or training. Because of these brain injuries, boxers are  more prone to mental deterioration during their later years, which may  lead to Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s disease.
 The “Assumption of Risk Doctrine†may potentially come into play in  this case. In a recent decision the Court of Appeals reaffirmed that the  doctrine, “applies where a consenting participant in sporting and  amusement activities ‘is aware of the risks; has an appreciation of the  nature of the risks; and voluntarily assumes the risks,†and where the  plaintiff has assumed the risks, “defendant owes him no duty.†Bukowski v  Clarkson Univ., 19N.Y.3d 353 (2012).
 Though facts about the potential risks of brain damage may be readily  available, the case is still likely to come down to the acts of the  defendants during the single incident of Abdusalamov’s injury. Recent  reports state that the boxer is in a rehabilitation facility and has  accumulated over $1 million in debt for medical bills. In the mean time,  the New York Athletic Commission has been actively making efforts to  change their medical protocol for boxers and competition.
http://www.boxinginsider.com/headli...v-raises-questions-negligence-responsibility/