Jewish Privilege

Antifa Professor Called For Killing Police Officers

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/15/michael-isaacson-john-jay-college-professor-outrag/

Mike_Isaacson_Fox_News_c16-0-640-364_s885x516.jpg
 
Statue of Jewish Confederate slave owner David Levy Yulee stands untouched in Florida.

DH42tQwWAAANKWB.jpg
 
https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False Religions/Wicca & Witchcraft/star_of_david.htm

The "Star of David" is not in the Bible.

Although it is now the most common and universally recognized sign of Judaism and Jewish identity, both within and outside the Jewish community, it has only achieved this status in the last two hundred years. Before that it was chiefly associated with magic or with the insignia of individual families or communities. While many legends state it was used by David and Solomon, no real historical proof exists. Rather all evidence suggests that early use of it, the hexagram was limited to "practical Kabbalah", that is, Jewish magic, probably dating back to the 6th century.

When the Zionist movement looked for a symbol they chose the "Star of David" because it was so well accepted as a Jewish symbol. Then when Israel became a state, it became the state symbol of its own national redemption. The "Star of David" is not in the Bible.
 
Last edited:
Apparently Fox is being sold to the "Chosen Ones" too. That's the only network they don't completely control.

Very sad news. They took over the Russian empire through violent Marxist revolution in 1917, but they've taken over the USA more gradually over many decades through Cultural Marxism. Americans' have gradually been losing their freedom.

Russia 1917: Sverdlov, Trotsky, Lenin, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sokolnikov, Yagoda, etc.

America 2017: Zucker (CNN), Plepler (HBO), Sherwood (Disney/ABC), Iger (Disney), Zuckerberg, Sandberg (Facebook), Brin, Page (Google), Moonves (CBS), Nevins (Showtime), Levine (Showtime Networks Inc.), etc.

The "mainstream" opinions expressed by the media are actually those of ONE ethnic group that comprises just 2% of the population. And it's considered a thought-crime to simply mention it!!!

 
Last edited:
There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen, in every land the Jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated; oppressed, they attempt to strangle the nation financially, as in the case of Portugal and Spain.

For more than seventeen hundred years they have lamented their sorrowful fate — namely, that they have been driven out of their mother land; but, gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine and their property, they would immediately find pressing reason for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires and vampires cannot live on other vampires — they cannot live among themselves. They must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race.

If they are not expelled from the United States by the Constitution within less than one hundred years, they will stream into this country in such numbers that they will rule and destroy us and change our form of Government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed our life, property and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded within two hundred years, our children will be working in the field to feed Jews while they remain in the counting houses, gleefully rubbing their hands.

I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children and your children’s children will curse you in their graves. Their ideas are not those of Americans, even when they lived among us for ten generations. The leopard cannot change his spots. The Jews are a danger to this land, and if they are allowed to enter, they will imperil our institutions. They should be excluded by the Constitution.
The above is attributed to Benjamin Franklin. Of course it is denied but I wouldn't buy into those denials. Interestingly, these are the same type of words used by many men throughout history. Nothing ever changes with Jewish people.
 
Even if ol' Ben didn't say it, it's still true. Period.
 
Charles Martel,
Don't think these memes aren't appreciated. They indeed are. We don't always reply but they are truth bombs and especially to the uninitiated and the lurkers. They speak volumes just by themselves. Keep up the fine, truthful work, sir!!
 
Sandy Koufax

from wiki:

Pitchers such as Sandy Koufax, Don Drysdale, Don Sutton, Fernando Valenzuela, and Orel Hershiser became superstars after arriving in Los Angeles. The pitcher's edge is also evident in the fact that 12 no-hitters have been thrown in the stadium, including two perfect games (by the Dodgers' Sandy Koufax in 1965, and by Dennis Martínez of the former Montreal Expos in 1991). Bo Belinsky threw the first ever no-hitter in Dodger Stadium on May 5, 1962 while pitching for the Los Angeles Angels (that club referred to the park as "Chavez Ravine".)
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Charles Martel said:
Sandy Koufax: the outfield fences were moved farther out in Dodger Stadium for Koufax's benefit, so home runs became fly balls. Has any other pitcher in baseball history ever had a stadium altered to help him?

From wiki:
Click to expand...

I was around back then and Koufax didn't need any special park. The distance to the fences in Dodger Stadium when it was built were not much different than other parks, 330 down both lines is not especially far.
 
From 1962 through 1966 when he prematurely retired, after Koufax had learned to control his location, he was about as unhittable as any pitcher ever. Like Sport Historian wrote, he didn't need to be and wasn't the beneficiary of any tinkering with the size of the playing field of Dodger Stadium.
 
The idea that the Dodgers moved back their outfield fences as a conspiracy to make a Jewish pitcher look good is silly. If there was any conspiracy at all behind that move, it was merely for the Dodgers to win more games. There are plenty of real examples of Jewish privilege; we don't need to make things up.

Sandy Koufax was a Jew and a legitimately great pitcher. The truth of that fact does not change the truth of another fact - that Jews control the media and the banks, and that their control has negative consequences for those under their rule, with White working-class people suffering most of all. That's the difference between Right and Left - we on the Right can acknowledge shades of grey and exceptions to rules while still seeing the broader picture, while those on the Left are locked in the narrow view of fanatical ideologues, with everything black or white, good or evil, no shades of grey, no exceptions, and a constant need for intersectionality (pretending that every left-wing hobbyhorse is connected to every other one). The Left needs a constant dopamine rush to the basest, most primitive part of their brains. We don't. That's what makes us better than them.
 
Why Sandy Koufax Owes a LOT of His Success to Dodger Stadium

https://bleacherreport.com/articles...x-owes-a-lot-of-his-success-to-dodger-stadium

Once the umpires instituted the new larger strike zones in 1963 and the mound was raised, Koufax became the most dominant pitcher on the planet.

In addition to the help he received from his park and the era, many people don’t even remember that before Koufax became a superhuman strikeout machine, he was actually a below-average pitcher.

Jayson Stark writes in his book, “The Stark Truth,” that Koufax is the most overrated left-handed pitcher of all-time. He focuses primarily on his first six seasons, what Stark refers to as The Other Half of Koufax's Career.

I don't want to penalize Koufax too much for his performance early on. However, Koufax did struggle with his control more than about any pitcher in the league. He constantly ranked among the league leaders in walks.

During his first six seasons, only one other pitcher in all of baseball who pitched as many innings as Koufax had a higher ERA than Koufax (Chuck Stobbs, 4.28). Koufax’s numbers were that of a struggling lefty trying to find his way. He was 36-40 with a 4.10 ERA and allowed close to 13 base runners per nine innings, including over five walks per game.

In fact, Koufax nearly quit the game following the 1960 season. He had gone just 8-13 with a 3.91 ERA, while walking 100 batters in just 175 innings pitched.

...continued...
Click to expand...
 
La France Blanche said:
The idea that the Dodgers moved back their outfield fences as a conspiracy to make a Jewish pitcher look good is silly. If there was any conspiracy at all behind that move, it was merely for the Dodgers to win more games. There are plenty of real examples of Jewish privilege; we don't need to make things up.

Sandy Koufax was a Jew and a legitimately great pitcher. The truth of that fact does not change the truth of another fact - that Jews control the media and the banks, and that their control has negative consequences for those under their rule, with White working-class people suffering most of all. That's the difference between Right and Left - we on the Right can acknowledge shades of grey and exceptions to rules while still seeing the broader picture, while those on the Left are locked in the narrow view of fanatical ideologues, with everything black or white, good or evil, no shades of grey, no exceptions, and a constant need for intersectionality (pretending that every left-wing hobbyhorse is connected to every other one). The Left needs a constant dopamine rush to the basest, most primitive part of their brains. We don't. That's what makes us better than them.
Click to expand...
As an old guy brought up in Brooklyn, I saw Koufax pitch in Brooklyn. He didn't hit his prime until he went to LA. When he was still in Brooklyn he was very wild. But once he got everything together, he was the best pitcher in baseball. He had about three incredible years and his arm went bad on him and he was done.
 
Charles Martel said:
Why Sandy Koufax Owes a LOT of His Success to Dodger Stadium

https://bleacherreport.com/articles...x-owes-a-lot-of-his-success-to-dodger-stadium
Click to expand...

A thoroughly stupid article by a writer, who by his own admission, wasn't alive when Koufax played. Furthermore, his theme was "Gibson was better than Koufax because of Dodger Stadium"

In fact, from 1966 on Gibson pitched (and had by far his best years) in the new Busch Stadium which was as favorable to pitchers as Dodger Stadium.
 
Because of Jewish power and privilege, the Jewish role in the slave trade is not discussed in the mainstream media. This video is informative however:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/QD2HtNIN31Tx/

But here a Jew claims that Jews always treated slaves kindly and fairly, and this slavery was very different from European slavery:



They are very clever at manipulation, lying, twisting the truth and justifying all their wrongdoings.
 
sport historian said:
A thoroughly stupid article by a writer, who by his own admission, wasn't alive when Koufax played. Furthermore, his theme was "Gibson was better than Koufax because of Dodger Stadium"
Click to expand...
No, his theme was the title of the article.
In fact, from 1966 on Gibson pitched (and had by far his best years) in the new Busch Stadium which was as favorable to pitchers as Dodger Stadium.
Click to expand...
The article is about Koufax, not Gibson, who is barely mentioned.

Actually, the author presents interesting statistics. Koufax was a below average pitcher before the Dodgers moved to LA. He was an ordinary pitcher on the road even during his best six years, his brilliant ERA at home clearly had very much to do with Dodger Stadium being a pitchers' ball park, as was well-known in baseball when I was growing up in the 1960s.

I'm sorry I brought Sandy Koufax up. Obviously he was one of your childhood favorites, as White Gentile players like Yastremski and Killebrew were for me. Still, if someone said "Yaz was overrated" I wouldn't get that angry. Of course, there are hundreds of great White Gentile players.

How many hundreds of times has Max Kellerman and other Jewish sports journalists said someone is overrated because he's white? The constant discrediting of white athletes by Jewish media people is why I started posting here in 2007. For example, I've heard: "Larry Bird is overrated because he's white" or "Rocky Marciano is overrated because he was white" or "the Klitschkos are overrated because they are white" or "Tom Brady is overrated because he's white". Yet I never once saw you complain about that. I wonder why?

Over the years, you've agreed with me here only twice: when I typed some harsh words about Hitler, and when I praised Jewish convert to Christianity Lawrence Auster for writing the truth about black-on-white rape.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top