jackie robinsuck/false idol worship at ES

Weltner

Guru
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
224
Location
United States
Why LOOK - there's ESPN, as always, pouring on the worship of a black "God" (That failed, as have it's descendants,worse than Communism ever did).

Every ten years - the seventh year of every decade,specifically, they haul out all the same ,worn-out,not just tired but DEAD, propaganda about jackie robinsuck, the one that began the poiosoning of every sport that would never have existed if-Whitey-hadn't-invented them,because blacks never would have.

And,as always,every ESPN anchor that pours on all the propaganda,reminds me of that "SNL" sketch where Rob Schneider played a man who would have a quick little orgasm at the mere mention of things that he really liked.They all do so at the mere mention of any black "hero", sports,politics,any of them.
 

Robert

Newbie
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
18
Location
New Jersey
Isn't it amazing how America keeps talking about setting examples patterned after "Martin Luther" King yet they never practice them. Skin color matters in reality, and the only reason baseball has been masturbating at the mere mention of Robinson's name is because they needed something to make them the holy vestige of p.c. in sports. They retire an entire number because of some baseball player's race, not because of the players' athletic abilities and statistics. All this talk our nation's spokesmen give about "people shouldn't be judged by their skin color" is total b.s.
 

Lance Alworth

Mentor
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
615
Location
Portland OR
Now to go along with this ridiculous charade, entire teams will be made to wear number 42 in honor of Robinson. What a freaking joke! Personally, I think teams should be forced to wear Ty Cobb's number. If "those" people can have their heroes (more like demigods) than why can't we?
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
136
Yes what reason does Jeff Kent, Derek Lowe, Jason Schmidt or Luis Gonzalez to wear Jackie Robinson's number. What the hell did he do for them? Absoultely nothing but start to grow the seeds of African showboating we see today in all major sports.
 

Bart

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
4,329
Baseball Fan said:
Yes what reason does Jeff Kent, Derek Lowe, Jason Schmidt or Luis Gonzalez to wear Jackie Robinson's number. What the hell did he do for them?


They are wearing his number to celebrate the fact that white children will continue to beeradicated from major league baseball. Bud Selig won't be happy until parity is achieved with basketball and football. In other words, we can expect Blacks, Latinoes, and Asians to comprise 75-80% of roster spots. We will see more black and minority managers, coaches,scouts,play by playannouncers, color men,office personnel and executives.The baseball, and chalk lines will be allowed to remain white.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
Next year they are going to choose one white player from each team and brand the number "42" onto their foreheads so that white fans never forget.
 

Robert

Newbie
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
18
Location
New Jersey
While watching the Mets game tonight (contrary to what some here have said about the Mets not having any White players; there are quite a number), former Dodger Duke Snider was a guest color man and of the announcer just had to invoke another Robinson query to Snider, who said something I didn't hear because I changed the channel. I turned it back to the game and I heard him say the word "taunts". You get the idea.


After the game ended, I turn on Fox Sports Network and their show "Baseball Report" (paraphrasing). I hear the LA Dodgers are making all of their players wear #42 on Sunday. Isn't that defying MLB's official retirement of that number, and considering that White players will be wearing it....how "r" word! Then some announcer starts talking about the Robinson hoopla not being an issue of political correctness (mind you, there was a caption across the screen which read "Talent Sees No Color"-yeah right!) yet goes on to say that some of baseball's best spokesmen are black. What was that all about? Was that implying that black players in general are spoiled, immature and showboating? Sure seemed like it to me; I smell stereotyping going on (isn't stereotyping one of the Western world's cardinal sins).


That lame-brained announcer can claim that talent is colorblind and that it is not marked with the p.c. brand of approval, but if anything, making a God out of a baseball player because of his skin color is the piece de resistance of political correctness (and no, silly announcer, inner-city leagues promised by Buddy Selig isn't going to bring more chocolate to the mound--unless you wish to include it with Goya foods and sushi).
 

foreverfree

Mentor
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
902
Lance Alworth said:
Now to go along with this ridiculous charade, entire teams will be made to wear number 42 in honor of Robinson. What a freaking joke! Personally, I think teams should be forced to wear Ty Cobb's number. If "those" people can have their heroes (more like demigods) than why can't we?

Didn't Cobb play before the era of uniform numbers? That said, er, asked, the idea remains great, Lance. Honor the GA Peach by having everybody play with bare-backed unis for a day.
smiley2.gif


John
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,565
Location
Pennsylvania
So many teams and individual players are "getting with the program" that within a year or two, all players will wear Robinson's number on "Jackie Robinson Day." Not a single white player will dare object, for fear of being called a racist. I've written it somewhat facetiously, but it wouldn't be surprising if the endgame is for Robinson to become the only American other than MLK to have a national holiday named in his honor.


During one of ESPN's many interminable JR pieces that take place with monotonous regularity during Sports Centers, it was mentioned that when Robinson played his first MLB game and made history by "breaking the color barrier," newspapers didn't even mention it in their stories on the Dodgers season opener. One would think this would have been a tremendously huge story at the time, and almost all written from a negative, anti-Robinson perspective by those evil white reporters in cahoots with those evil white "taunting" fans. Instead, it becomes more important each year in retrospect as history is continually re-written to fit the ever-changing, lie-filledGreat American Narrative. Most of real American history has been distorted or consigned to the Memory Hole,replaced bythe Holy Days of Cultural Marxism, to which all must genuflect.
 

Robert

Newbie
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
18
Location
New Jersey
I read this tripe from the good folks at VDARE.com. This article comes from a writer who taught ESL to third worlders, and goes into a fog whenever pondering why third worlders don't want to behave like Americans. From previous articles I have read by him, I also learned that he is in support of women's oridination for the Catholic church.


http://www.vdare.com/guzzardi/070413_vfl.htm





April 13, 2007
<H1>View From Lodi, CA: Jackie Robinson, 60 Years Later</H1>


By Joe Guzzardi


By the time Jackie Robinson took the field for the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1947 as Major League Baseball's first African American player, his name and accomplishments were already well known to me.


As a young boy growing up in Los Angeles, I was aware of Robinson's athletic achievements. Robinsonâ€â€￾whose 60th anniversary as baseball's first African-American player is being celebrated this weekendâ€â€￾was a legend.


And for good reason. At the University of California at Los Angeles, Robinson was the first student to playâ€â€￾and excelâ€â€￾at four varsity sports concurrently: baseball, football, track and basketball.


Baseball consumed me. Although the major leagues didn't arrive in Los Angeles until 1957, I followed it with a passion that few could match. Every evening I read the box scores from the Los Angeles Herald-Examiner. In those days, games back east were played during the day and the results were printed in the late edition.


Then, after I had digested the big league statistics, I turned my attention to the local California Triple-A minor league teams: the Hollywood Stars, the Los Angeles Angels, the San Francisco Seals and the Sacramento Solons.


But while I was old enough to appreciate and admire Robinson's skills when he took the field, I was in no way mature enough to understand what he had to endure.


During Robinson's first game against the Boston Braves, the Braves' manager, Ben Chapman, yelled out at Jackie, "Hey ******, why don't you go back to the cotton field where you belong?"


Even one of Robinson's teammates, Eddie Stanky, was an enemy. Before the opening game against the Braves, Stanky approached Robinson and said," "Before I play with you I want you to know how I feel about it. I want you to know I don't like it. I want you to know I don't like you."


Despite the overwhelming odds against his success created by the atmosphere of hate that surrounded him Robinson, who lead the Dodgers to six pennants in ten years, went on to be a Hall of Fame baseball player and also one of America's key civil rights figures.


As Robinson,looking back on his career
irt=vdare&l=ur2&o=1
,
said:
"I had to fight hard against loneliness, abuse and the knowledge that any mistake I made would be magnified because I was the only black man out there. Many people resented my impatience and honesty, but I never cared about acceptance as much as I cared about respect."


But on Jackie Robinson Day on April 15<SUP>th</SUP>, as the deserved celebrations of Robinson, his career and his role as one of America's most important 20<SUP>th</SUP> century figures, play out across the country, there are sad and ironic footnotes to his story.


The first is that so few Americans, including major league players, know anything at all about Robinson or his sacrifices. This, in a world where only a handful of people can identify the current Chief Justice of the Supreme Court or recognize a photograph of John F. Kennedy, is not altogether surprising.


But it is disappointing.


Second, and an even greater disappointment is that, despite Robinson's crusade on their behalf, so few Blacks play baseball today.


According to a 2006 study by the University of Central Florida's Institute of Diversity and Ethics in Sports, only 8.4 percent of major league players are black, a decline from 9 percent in 2004 and 2005.


This is the fewest number of baseball playing blacks in since 1986.


On the other hand, 29.4 percent of major league players in 2006 were Hispanic and 2.4 percent were Asian, both an increase over their 2005 totals.


The good news is that neither of these two facts will in any way detract from the recognition of Robinson and baseball's "proudest and most powerful moment" at Dodger Stadium.


Joe Guzzardi [email him], an instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School, has been writing a weekly column since 1988. It currently appears in the Lodi News-Sentinel.
 

LabMan

Mentor
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
644
Location
Pennsylvania
Yeah,good old Joe used to be a Pittsburgh resident,but now has taken leave of the city,and in some columns,taken leave of his senses.Most of the time,he draws a line downward in our society as non whites pour into all American cities,do not assimilate,uplift crime rates,and change our culture.And now as our American pastime is made up of 60% White players,I wonder if Joe has any grandkids who will never reach the major league level because they will be "Caste"out!
 

PitBull

Guru
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
448
Vdare has to walk a fine line between telling the truth about our illegal aliens
and not appearing "racist"--they want to get the message out to the
mainstream. Too bad for them race is the issue.

So what they do is bend over backwards with a few columns like this to pad
their "non-racist" street cred. Not to worry. They'll be back to telling the
truth tomorrow.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,565
Location
Pennsylvania
Guzzardi wrote: "This is the fewest number of baseball playing blacks in since [sic] 1986."


That's wrong. The number of U.S. blacks in MLB peaked in 1975 and has been in decline ever since. The last time there was less than 9 percent blacks in the bigs had to have been in the mid to late '50s or early '60s.


BTW, ESPN's homepage currently features a mere seven articles about Jackie Robinson. How much longer until the media begins to mention a "growing movement" to honor Robinson with a national holiday the first Monday in April?Edited by: Don Wassall
 

Lance Alworth

Mentor
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
615
Location
Portland OR
foreverfree said:
Lance Alworth said:
Now to go along with this ridiculous charade, entire teams will be made to wear number 42 in honor of Robinson. What a freaking joke! Personally, I think teams should be forced to wear Ty Cobb's number. If "those" people can have their heroes (more like demigods) than why can't we?

Didn't Cobb play before the era of uniform numbers? That said, er, asked, the idea remains great, Lance. Honor the GA Peach by having everybody play with bare-backed unis for a day.
smiley2.gif


John

Really? I wasn't aware that they didn't wear numbers in Ty Cobbs day. I'm not much of a baseball fan. 1994 was the last year I followed it with any sort of interest. Since then, its been erased from my memory banks. Even though it's 60% white, I still find most baseball players to be greedy SOB's who would sell their own mothers for a cup of coffee. Their refusal to accept any form of salary cap in which the gap between the haves and have-nots increases year by year, has all but turned me off from the sport for good.

Anyway, I'm getting a little off track here. I think if Idiot Selig would pay more attention to the OBVIOUS problems his sport is facing rather than trying to oil a squeaky wheel with this race BS regarding Robinson. Baseball might just be better off
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
136
Most of the Mets White players are pitchers and David Wright, Paul LoDuca. Scott Schoenweis, David Newhan, and Shawn Green for obivous reasons don't qualify.

Gary Cohen, Ron Darling and Duke Snider were talking about Jackie Robinson. Cohen a normally fair announcer despite his genetic handicap did ask Snider about the discrimnation Jackie faced and how he felt as his teammate. Duke said that most of his teammates really didn't acknowledge Jackie's race and just saw him as a player that could make the team better. Duke did throw in a PC answer saying that he was embarrased by the behavior of some of them. They spent most of the time talking about the NL West and complaining about the weather in the segment, and gushing over Reyes. I will say this about Reyes does he have a girl friend, something seems weird about him sexually?
 

foreverfree

Mentor
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
902
Lance, I don't have it in front of me right now, and I don't know about when other sports started using numbers, but I remember Babe: The Legend Comes to Life (by Bob Creamer) stating where the Yankees began wearing numbers in 1929. Ruth got #3 and Gehrig #4 in honor of their slots in the batting order. There was precedent, Creamer noted (the Indians tried numbers as a one-game experiment in 1916[?]).

I remember an article* in Sports Illustrated around 1985 that talked about the history of uniform numbers. Regarding the rest of MLB following the Bronx Bombers' lead in adopting numbers over the next couple of years, the article said (I'm paraphrasing) "When the Yankees sneezed, the rest of baseball said 'bless you'".

John

*That article also had a cartoon of hockey's Rocket Richard, Gordie Howe, and Bobby Hull fighting over the puck. They all wore #9.
 

AlexLinder

Newbie
Joined
Apr 15, 2007
Messages
12
Location
Missouri
Hello, people. I couldn't find a contact at Caste Football, so I joined to post this article, will stop by from time to time.


<h2 id="post-1656"><div ="titolpost">The Deification of Jackie Robinson, Who Helped Jews Destroy the Negro Leagues, is Unmeet</div></h2>
Posted by alex in Alex Linder, sports, judeo-communism, baseball at 9:58 pm |
post.gif
Permanent Link




robinsonstamp.jpg














Sports is politics by other means.








By Alex Linder















The past few years have seen Major League Baseball (MLB) attempt to turn the first black MLB player into a saint, nay, god. It's another example of judeo-communism, American style.















Jackie Robinson Day (April 15) is baseball's MLK day -
the day on which baseball does its part to celebrate federally forced
race-mixing. After Ken Griffey, black, petitioned jew Bud Selig to wear
Robinson's number, many other players followed suit, including the
rosters of at least six full teams. All players will sign their jerseys
after Sunday's games, and turn them over to the Robinson foundation to be auctioned, whether they want to or not.

































There is no record of the Robinson foundation giving any money or help to White children. In other words, it is a racist foundation
following exactly the same policy of exclusion that MLB did in the
decades it was controlled by Whites.[1] (Not that MLB prevented blacks
from stealing the White man's baseball, setting up their own leagues,
and profiting from them. Not a single black or jew has invented a sport
that White men play for tens of millions of dollars a year. Keep on
denouncing White racism, hypocritical jews and janitors.)















Under judeo-communism, jewish racism and black racism
are celebrated in the media and enshrined in the law - but White racism
is denounced as ‘hate.' White organizations are illegal. Equal protection under the law? It does not exist.















You begin to see why White Americans sought to protect
themselves from blacks and jews, don't you? The jews and coloreds
complain about racism and discrimination while practicing it
themselves. They are hypocrites. They maintain private segregated
institutions, usually funded in part or whole out of White pockets,
while demanding full and more-than-equal access to public institutions.
But when it comes to Whites, the jews and blacks flip and demand that
Whites be legally prevented from organizing their own racially exclusive political and social groups.















The general principle here is that everything Whites do
and produce must be open at all times for jew-black inspection,
consumption or confiscation. Whites living in a jew-produced democracy
have no rights against jewish or black demands.







They call it civil rights, but genocide is its true name.















belikejackie.jpg
















Every single announcer employed by MLB teams gushes
over Robinson and what a hero he was, and what a noble struggle he
fought and represented. Departure from the Party Line is as unthinkable
as laughter during a Stalin harangue.















Whites should see Robinson, his career, what he
represented, and those who used him, in a different light, in a, shall
we say, White light.















The following are facts that are left out of the Robinson legend, in order to cleanse and simplify it for saps in the reclining pews.















- Robinson's father abandoned his family. (This was less common among Blacks before the "civil rights" era Robinson helped usher in. Thomas Sowell,[2] the black academic, has documented that black lives were improving faster by virtually every index before ‘civil rights' than after it. Yes, that is the exact opposite of what you hear from the jews on tv. Yes, it is true. Races do better among themselves.*)















- Robinson's son was a druggie. Robinson
may have been closer to being a good ****** than others, but his own
bloodline shows he's the exception rather than the rule. Whites
excluded blacks from their society because they were so many Robinsons.
It was an exclusion rational, reasonable, and moral.

















- Robinson was a criminal and gang member.















- Robinson broke the law while he was in the military,
by refusing a legal order to move to the back of the bus. This is
treated as an heroic move on his part, but that assumes that the laws
enforcing segregation in the military as in broader society were
invalid and immoral. In fact, they were neither. And in any case they
were the law. Blacks were segregated from Whites for reasons of
military effectiveness and social harmony - reasons that today's
jew-controlled media cover up and deny in order to preserve the charade
that civil rights and integration, their euphemisms for
mixing-races-at-gunpoint, are good things. When you mix blacks and
whites, you get Channon Christian corpses.
That is the everday downside of ‘civil rights' - and it is a downside
the jews producing what you see on tv never, and I mean NEVER,
acknowledge. It is a downside that outweighs the upside, seeing as how tens of thousands of Whites have been murdered by blacks since the jews pushed through race-communism in the sixties. In fact, it isn't a downside at all - it's genocide. Planned genocide. Courtesy of the jews"¦















- Robinson supported Malcolm X.
Homosexual pimp and street hustler X hated Whites and called for their
racial destruction. Why are jews and blacks who advocate White genocide
called heroes while those who advocate their defense are called evil?
Whites didn't get 40,000 jews murdered by blacks - jews got 40,000 Whites murdered. How come you don't know about this ‘Dirty War‘? Why doesn't Steve Bornstein, the jew who runs ESPN, tell you?

















- Robinson was not the first Black professional baseball player in White leagues.
There were others in the minor leagues dating back to the 1870s, the
very beginning of professional baseball. Blacks were not liked, but
here and there black individuals were tolerated. By contrast, no white
player not good enough to make the Major Leagues but good enough to
play in the Negro Leagues was ever allowed to.















- Robinson was given the Congressional Gold Medal in 2003, and the Congressional Medal of Freedom by Ronald Reagan
during his term. Proving yet again, although it isn't necessary, that
anyone called conservative after 1980 isn't. Appeaser, collaborator,
Jew-tool are the right terms. Jews write their speeches, jews select
the "narrative"Â chosen to represent history, the useful
Reaganimatronics serve as the public faces out of which pour jewish Big
Lies. The cost of gunpoint race-mixing is the lives of tens of
thousands â€" tens of thousands â€" of Channon Christians
and Chris Newsoms. They don't have Days, just graves. The lie that
gunpoint race-mixing is good can only be sustained with hagiography,
false history, and news blackouts.















- Robinson entered Major League Baseball in 1947; the Negro Leagues were disbanded in 1949.
So those who say that Jackie Robinson was good for blacks are also
saying that they believe the destruction of the Negro Leagues was good
for the black race. The Negro Leagues were one of biggest entertainment
draws for urban blacks in the first half of the 20th century.
Integration, or gun-point race-mixing, destroyed all that. No more
black owners, players, or income. All down the drain.















The kicker? Today there are fewer blacks in
professional baseball than at any point pretty much since Robinson's
arrival. ESPN, which styles itself the world sports leader, regularly
bemoans black absence from baseball. To express concern about White
numbers in any sport is of course racist, but ESPN cries around the
clock that MLB rosters are only 9% black.
The conceit is put forward that blacks simply aren't choosing baseball
- it being understood that blacks are the best athletes.[3] They just
prefer basketball and football. The facts are otherwise, but the facts
never get in the way of the lying jews who produce ESPN.




Whites who celebrate Jackie Robinson Day celebrate
nothing less than their race's cultural destruction and genocidal
dispossession at the hands of lying, conniving jews.
















______________
















[1] At this link you can read about the Robinson Foundation's mission: Perpetuating the legacy of Jackie Robinson by providing scholarships and leadership development for minority youths.
(Bolding and underlining added.) This means that Major League Baseball,
under the leadership of the jew Bud Selig, forces White players to
subsidize an organization that racially discriminates against their own
children. Whites are 8% of the globe's population, and as Bud Selig,
who is a jew, says in every single interview, baseball is more popular
today than it ever has been â€" and more global, stretching
from South America all the way to Korea. So the RF scholarships are
carefully reserved for the 92% minority and denied to the 8% majority
of the global population that is White. Jewish math, itz.















[2] Sowell must be read with caution; the reader must
carefully sift the facts he unearths, which are reliable, from his
interpretations, which are a mixed bag. He is a neocon trained by jews,
and will not or does not see that the ‘civil-rights movement' was
produced by jews for jewish ends; that the movement was never intended
to raise blacks but to destroy Whites.














[3] Baseball was "the"Â sport in the first half of the
20th century. If it were true that blacks are the best athletes, as the
jews lie, then Whites would have been trying to get into the Negro Leagues,
rather than vice versa. But the Negro League never even kept
statistics, so what ESPN asserts about the achievements of blacks never
allowed to play in the Major Leagues is unsubstantiated rumor
repetition. As in broader society, once White superiority is denied
theoretically, racism or some other black-flattering non-explanation is
what remains. The fact is that Whites are better at baseball than blacks.
The jewish Big Lie is that the best athletes are blacks who prefer
other sports to baseball. But you never hear ESPN say that the best
White athletes choose baseball over football or basketball. Whites
can't win. As long as jews produce our sports and our politics, Whites
will be portrayed as second-raters and bigots.http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/?p=1656#more-1656
 

Bear-Arms

Mentor
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
1,150
Location
United States
Kind of interesting how the American League is honoring Jackie Robinson and not Larry Doby.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
Seems as though all the players are wearing #42 today. Ken Griffey Jr. complained about how there are just 7% blacks now.All this love and bemoaning is getting to be too much for me, and Ithink I'm gonna tear up.
smiley19.gif
 

LabMan

Mentor
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
644
Location
Pennsylvania
The Oakland A's started eight White position players today against the Yankees,and two players wore #42 on their uniforms,black outfielder Shannon Stewart,and White starting pitcher,Rich Hardin.

A surprising number of Yankee players wore their regular uniform numbers.Robinson Cano,Derek Jeter, wore #42

A very nice win for the mostly White A's club,Marco Scuturo hit a walk off home run in the ninth,giving Oakland a 5-4 win!
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
AlexLinder, they used churches for political meetings during the civil rights movement anyway, so this isn't a big switch.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,565
Location
Pennsylvania
By next season, or '09 at the latest, any white player not donning St. Jackie's jersey number on his burgeoning national holiday will be accused of being a racist.
 

Lance Alworth

Mentor
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
615
Location
Portland OR
well one sight of good news is that I think every single game where the entire teams wore #42 were all rained out today. Maybe this is some sort of omen
 
Top