Bear-Arms said:The media is going overboard with the Blackhawks attendance issue. Its an attack on the fans of Chicago, when it should be an attack on the owner. If you're not showing home games on tv you're losing out on an entire generation of potential fans. You can't blame no one but the owner for that. It will take more than a 2 game winning streak to get fans back to United Center.
That article was nothing but a hit piece on hockey by ESPN. The article focused on the Blackhawks' continuing attendance woes, and the Avalanche not selling out a game for the first time in 11 years. The article asks ominously: Is hockey attendance in trouble? Commissioner Gary Bettman says it's too early to hit the panic button.
Colorado only fell 326 fans short of a sellout. But more to the point, most teams that don't sell out every game have their worst attendance figures right after the home opener, namely early midweek games against lackluster opponents before hockey fever has really set in. For the Avalanche to come up just short of a sellout is hardly worthy of a national article.
Then we find this beauty: Thus far this season, 14 teams are playing to capacity houses nightly -- Montreal, Tampa Bay, Detroit, Philadelphia, Toronto, Calgary, Ottawa, Carolina, Buffalo, Vancouver, Dallas, Minnesota, the New York Rangers and San Jose.
"Thus far"???? At the time the article was written most teams had played all of 2 home games! Anyone with a basic knowledge of statistics knows that no meaningful conclusions can be drawn from such a small sample. After 5 percent of the season has been played, absolutely no one knows whether overall attendance in the NHL will be up or down this season. And since most teams play to capacity or near-capacity crowds, the best educated guess is that attendance for '06-'07 will end up very close to what it was last year, within a percent or two in either direction.
This isn't journalism; it's fitting an article into a pre-selected point of view.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/news/story?id=2629188