FastEuro said:
Actually simple physics dictates that a tall man does NOT have the same leg turn-over as a smaller man.
Physics should also dictate that a tall man does not start quickly. Both Bolt and Powell come out of the blocks pretty fast for tall guys.
I don't like to point at any individual as a dope user. Even when there is proof, I still don't like to point because then one individual is singled out as a villain -- while everyone around him is just as guilty, and maybe moreso. Besides that, it's probably a fairly even playing field among the top athletes, and so I don't like to point the finger at that one person just because he excels.
But it's ruining the sport, and so I will write a few thoughts here...
Personally, I think that sports are the gateway to drugs.
I wish Jaxvid would chime in again about his idea of Jamaica as a drug testing ground. It does look scientific. Forget about Bolt. What about the powerhouse Jamaican women?
Jamaicans are all-around doped, not just in sports. The everday girl down there illegally obtains a certain chicken antibiotic because it makes her rear-end big, which supposedly makes her attractive. This is mainstream behavior, from what I've read.
I am beginning to wonder if not only are muscle-building and recovery drugs in scientific use, but even some kind of neuro-stimulants on the day of the big race for selected runners.
Charlie Francis (Ben Johnson's coach) once commented on sprinter's behavior before the race, saying that he was surprised that the sprinters don't hop on top of one another before the race begins -- because they are injected with the same chemical that is given to stallions to incite them to breed with the mare. Helps you run faster on race day, apparently. Also alters behavior, excitability.
Maybe Bolt is less doped than most, and thus doesn't usually get (or need) his race-day "stallion" shot. He ran 3% (.28) slower in the Jamaican championships (not exactly like he could be jogging it with Asafa Powell in the same race), and his World Championship time was 2% (.21) faster than his season best. These margins are huge for an athlete in-form.
I like Bolt. I am thousands of miles away, and thus have no direct evidence to say that he's on dope. It wouldn't surprise me if he's on LESS dope than most. But looking at patterns and probabilities, it would be foolish to assert that he is NOT on dope. The fast sprinters of recent years seem to be on dope. The Jamaican women seem to be on dope.
Bolt without dope could be very, very good; legendarily good. But it would have taken years of consistent and injury-free training. He had stagnated in his progress for three years. He had loads of talent, but just seemed to be one of those tall kids who gain muscle only after years of training and effort.
Why did the "simple physics" only kick-in after stagnating for three years, losing in the World Championships in 2007 to Gay, and promising to do whatever it takes to win the next time around? People sometimes mention how young Bolt is, but physiologically he is about Wariner's age. He has been 6'5" for many years. Should we expect Wariner to suddenly drop down a time in the mid-42's? Should we expect Craig Pickering to be running in the 9.7-9.8 range next year?
I hate writing these things pointing a finger. You can take out Bolt's name, and substitute the name of someone else. Maybe the drugs are probably medically healthy to help recover from difficult training when used properly, I don't know. I don't want to imply an intrinsic moral guilt to the practice - but it is ruining the sport.
Edited by: Observer