How the NFL Went Communist

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,417
Location
Pennsylvania
The author calls himself Hawaii Libertarian on his men's rights blog (http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.ca/ -- warning: my anti-virus software keeps saying "malicious link" when I go to his site). He's unfamiliar with the Caste System but is hip to a lot of the rest of the league's agenda.

How the NFL Went Communist

by Keoni Galt
And Social Justice for All
(Excerpt by henrymakow.com)

The NFL's regularly scheduled programming has long been concerned with promoting the military-industrial-complex and statist obeisance for the feedlot inhabitants citizenry. But ever since our induction into the globalized Brave New World Order, the NFL has also played an integral role in the gradual implementation of the authoritarian police state.

As Dave Hodges wrote in December: "The NFL now represents the antithesis of everything that comprises the backbone of traditional American values. I love the game of football. Football was one of the sports that I grew up playing and I later coached the sport as a former head coach in the high school ranks prior to moving to coach college basketball. I thoroughly enjoyed the competition at every level both as a player and a coach. However, the NFL has taken all the fun out of the game, because the league spouts the mantra of the globalist forces which seeks to enslave us."

Support for the military and patriotic statism is certainly the NFL's longest running, overt programming that we the long-time viewers and consumers have been subjected to. But it seems like the politically-correct agenda of the $ocial Justice Whores has really taken increased precedence in the last five years or so. Every single topic being promulgated in our modern age by the $JW's useful idiots and change agents has taken front and center, as the daily topics du jour in the National Sports media.

Most obvious has been the complete surrender of the teams uniform integrity during the month of October towards the cause of radiating women's breasts to support one of the most profitable niche markets of the medical-healthcare-insurance industrial complex. Perhaps it's success in promoting the mammography industry has emboldened the social engineers in charge of NFL programming to kick it up a few notches.

As the mass media programming agenda continues to escalate it's descent down the gradualist slippery slope of hope and change, we are now inundated with every politically correct topic, meme and shibboleth that furthers the Brave New World Order's agenda for population control.

In light of the dramatic Ray Rice vs. Janay TKO video footage, Adrian Peterson's Southern-style discipline for his unruly son being equated to child abuse, and the arrests of several other high profile players for "domestic violence" issues, the mandate for more change is here, and $JW's premiere stooge and puppet, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell is not letting the opportunity of the current crisis go to waste.

No sirree...Goodell in a letter sent to all 32 franchises, our $JW Commissioner announces that he is now appointing four $JW feminazi's to some newly created positions in the NFL Administration to "...show the league is taking domestic violence and sexual assault matters seriously..."

Anna Isaacson, the NFL's vice president of community affairs and philanthropy, will now be in an expanded role as "vice president of social responsibility."

The league also has retained as senior advisors Lisa Friel, the former head of the Sex Crimes Prosecution Unit in the New York County District Attorney's Office; NO MORE co-founder Jane Randel; and Rita Smith, the former executive director of the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. They will be in charge of overseeing the development and implementation of the NFL's domestic violence/sexual assault (DV/SA) workplace policy; building on existing training curricula and education programs for all personnel, including players and non-players; disseminating and executing completed training programs for all 32 teams, including executives, coaches, players and staff; identifying and managing DV/SA resources to enhance current services such as NFL Life Line and the NFL's Employee Assistance Programs for league and club employees and their families; identifying and disseminating information to employees and families regarding resources outside of the NFL and clubs, including local advocacy and support organizations in each NFL community."...

Ahh, it looks like we now see the real agenda here: lucrative NFL make-work careers created for all the Liberal Arts and Women's Studies $JW Degree graduates from the nation's institutions of higher learning $JW indoctrination mills!

It's now just a matter of time before all NFL players and everyone else employed by the league, are going to be forced to attend workshops and conferences where they will be subjected to power point presentations, skits, videos and tearful testimonials of Women's Studies graduates and interns, all as a part of this new program for "sensitivity training" and "social responsibility."

I'm sure this will undoubtedly improve the quality of the game.

While it garners most of the national sports media attention, the NFL competition itself is still compelling enough for me to endure the $JW programming and still tune in to the games. While I used to watch all the pre and post game shows for analysis and replays on ESPN and the NFL Network, I no longer watch any of it. I DVR games, then begin watching them later so I can fast forward all the commercials, interviews, "special interest features" and heart-rending interviews by faux-sympathetic female journalists asking players how they F E E E E L about something.

I just can't take that crap anymore.

But I still watch the Games, and the highlights of the other games I missed, because I still find the sport itself to be compelling entertainment worth enduring the whatever $JW commercialism I can't avoid.

http://henrymakow.com/2014/09/how-the-nfl-went-communist.html
 

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
Communists have a policy of using everything for political purposes.

Their subversion of the NFL is an example of this.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
I don't quite understand the use of "communism" in this context. Is the NFL trying to establish common ownership of the means of production amongst fans? players? 'mericans? I guess he means "cultural marxism" which he should have just said, or perhaps drawing some parallel to Soviet Russia, however Soviet Russia was of course conservative as hell.

That aside he makes good points that are hard to argue, he didn't even hit upon the gay agenda with Micheal Sam, a big part of the NFL and its "communist" agenda. I also didn't get the use of "$JW". What is that supposed to mean?

Unfortunately a 'Hawaiian Libertarian' is probably not going to care too much about anti-white discrimination in the NFL, after all it's a private organization.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
703
He's unfamiliar with the Caste System but is hip to a lot of the rest of the league's agenda.

Yeah, I basically empathize w/this guy's take on the modern NFL. I love watching & following the game, but the surrounding hype is hard to take.
I've noticed (anecdotally, in my extended family, trips to bars, etc) a significant increase in female fans over the last 10-15 years, which I think is driving a lot of the decision making & marketing within the National Feminized League. It makes sense when the NFL sees lots of female fans spending money & directing attention on their game, that they've subsequently taken highly visible postures on breast cancer & domestic abuse.. I also think female viewership/interest is driving a lot of the gossip in sports media now (?).. Sports media rarely would've covered stories of infidelities in the past.. So even tho I don't enjoy the new NFL paradigm, I think I get it.

And like Don stated, this writer is mum on the caste. He singles out female sports reporters for criticism, but ignores all the male charity cases like Sapp, Bart Scott, Primetime,.. who would never earn analyst work in a meritocratic, non-"communist" media..
 

PamelaOC

Banned
Joined
Nov 25, 2013
Messages
515
Not too excited about this guy. "Women's rights activism" and "men's rights activism" are two sides of the same coin. Both ideologies promote the false idea that conflict is the natural state between men and women, when in reality any "conflict" is an artificial one created by the cultural Marxists to keep men and women (especially white men and white women) too busy at each other's throats to see who's really pulling the strings. Both movements also promote one sex as Natural Born Victims (TM) and the other as Natural Born Oppressors (TM) - they just disagree about who gets which role.

Some pro-white stuff would help as well.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2004
Messages
2,986
I don't quite understand the use of "communism" in this context. Is the NFL trying to establish common ownership of the means of production amongst fans? players? 'mericans? I guess he means "cultural marxism" which he should have just said, or perhaps drawing some parallel to Soviet Russia, however Soviet Russia was of course conservative as hell.

That aside he makes good points that are hard to argue, he didn't even hit upon the gay agenda with Micheal Sam, a big part of the NFL and its "communist" agenda. I also didn't get the use of "$JW". What is that supposed to mean?

Unfortunately a 'Hawaiian Libertarian' is probably not going to care too much about anti-white discrimination in the NFL, after all it's a private organization.

He's probably the type libertarian who would in the end embrace the anti-white agenda.
 

PamelaOC

Banned
Joined
Nov 25, 2013
Messages
515
He's probably the type libertarian who would in the end embrace the anti-white agenda.

I don't know about him, but I roll my eyes at Alex Jones types who think the FEMA camps are for da innocent blakk maing to be locked up by rayciss whitey.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
703
"Women's rights activism" and "men's rights activism" are two sides of the same coin. Both ideologies promote the false idea that conflict is the natural state between men and women..

Pamela, I'm with ya on this ^.
I find the 'Battle of the Sexes' is usually waged by angry, hurt people who've had their views on sexual relations unfortunately warped by bad experiences with the opposite sex.. And I noticed, and commented, on the fact that I think this writer unfairly singled out female sports reporters for criticism, amidst the sea of unintelligible male charity cases working as Not Fully Lucid analysts now (I'd much rather see & hear Allie LaForce on CBS than Bart Scott).

But I agree with the balance of his piece.. The NFL has guys running around in pink,.. there are daily tabloid-like/gossip reports on domestic, personal issues, ethnic month celebrations. Bcuz the NFL has such a diverse audience, I think the league's become a targeted mule for cultural Marxists, and these dudes have become vassals & guinea pigs for Marxist causes.
 

goyim

Guru
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
367
I also didn't get the use of "$JW". What is that supposed to mean?

SJW is an acronym for social justice warrior. It's a catchall term to describe Millennial cultural marxists (feminism, gay rights, etc) who are radically anti-speech and seek to destroy livelihoods of those who do not fall in line with their warped value system.

Further reading:

http://www.rooshv.com/what-is-a-social-justice-warrior-sjw
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
SJW is an acronym for social justice warrior. It's a catchall term to describe Millennial cultural marxists (feminism, gay rights, etc) who are radically anti-speech and seek to destroy livelihoods of those who do not fall in line with their warped value system.

Further reading:

http://www.rooshv.com/what-is-a-social-justice-warrior-sjw

That's a great link! Thanks for the information. There are getting to be too many acronyms to be able to follow them all IMHO.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,417
Location
Pennsylvania
Not too excited about this guy. "Women's rights activism" and "men's rights activism" are two sides of the same coin. Both ideologies promote the false idea that conflict is the natural state between men and women, when in reality any "conflict" is an artificial one created by the cultural Marxists to keep men and women (especially white men and white women) too busy at each other's throats to see who's really pulling the strings. Both movements also promote one sex as Natural Born Victims (TM) and the other as Natural Born Oppressors (TM) - they just disagree about who gets which role.

Some pro-white stuff would help as well.

Men's rights activists reject the notion that conflict is the natural state between men and women. To the contrary, harmony characterizes the balance between the sexes in a healthy society.

The manosphere is a welcome and long overdue reaction to 50 years of extremist feminism that has poisoned relations between men and women and instituted misandric policies both in law (the family courts) and the media.

The Roosh article linked by Goyim is a tremendous one, and a lot of the comments after it are high quality as well. White men are the targets of an all-out psy-war against them on all fronts and the destruction of the natural balance and harmony between men and women is the most vital part of the cultural communist agenda. The "Ubiquitous Man Hating" thread in CF's Media Racism and Stereotyping is also a great source of information.

Men's rights activists love women (there are of course exceptions) and want to see happy relationships and happy families, which are the bedrock of a healthy society. Professional feminists (the ones in control of the media and legal system) hate men with a passion; misandry is imbedded in every fiber of their being. To equate the small band of unfunded, establishment-despised men's rights activists who are blogging on the margins of the internet with the top-down funded and supported militant feminist movement is about as far off-base as one can get.
 
Top