ToughJ.Riggins said:
I have seen a fairly significant number of black h.s players who take the ACT that score in the low to mid twenties. Mid twenties is a great score for the ACT. I believe 30 is perfect. Still the white student athletes do a bit better, but this seems to point to some kind of cultural/ intelligence trend.
I have heard that the ACT is more of a memory based and practical test as far as typical daily use. The SAT is more abstract reasoning and may favor Math and the Mathematical Science's brained people.
Tough, the perfect score on the ACT is actually 36.
you heard correctly about the differences between the ACT and the SAT, however. the ACT is based more on memorizing and practical usage. the SAT is indeed a more abstract-based test that measures more accurately raw intelligence.
that being said, BOTH tests have been re-configured in recent years, altering the way they determine their scores in order to "reflect more diverse results."
the tests are now both weighted more heavily on verbal scores and have lowered the importance of the math portion and the reasoning portion in order to increase the overall scores of minority test takers.
despite the attempt to artificially inflate their scores, it is not surprising that blacks and hispanics still do abysmally. while asians and whites still do very well.
ToughJ.Riggins said:
I have heard that the online sample tests are a little easier than the actual standard test given to football players b/c they want to keep secret some of the questions from the general public. I just read Wikipedia and it confirms this. Still even if it was a little easier the only way I got the 30 on the test was basically by going forward glancing at each question and skipping anyone that seemed like a harder more lengthy question. There was a geometry question I skipped for instance that I could have figured out if I had the time. A score of 10 indicates a person is literate and a score of 20 is supposedly average.
Edited to add: However, when they gave the test to EMPLOYED people in various professions the average score was 24 according to Wikipedia.
two points on this, Tough.
1) take anything you read on Wikipedia with a grain of salt until you confirm it with a legitimate source. Wikipedia is not anything close to proof of anything. especially anything that is potentially controversial or politically incorrect.
2) the online questions that can be found for the Wonderlic test are actual questions that are on the test. i have taken the Wonderlic multiple times for various reasons, and often times the
exact questions you see online are reproduced on the test.
anyone with average intelligence and the slightest bit of preparation should score in the mid-20s or higher. the test is so routine, that even un-intelligent people who study should score a respectable 20 or thereabouts.
so, when you hear of some dumbass who scores in the single digits, it is safe to say they are completely stupid, reads at less than a 6th grade level, and can't do basic math. i am not exaggerating.
furthermore, they should never, EVER have been allowed in a university where so-called higher learning allegedly takes place.