Hollywood Pushes Liberal Agenda

white lightning

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
20,687

Bucky

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 20, 2018
Messages
9,097
Disney and Tik Tok along with everyone else trying to start a race war.

I’d say it’s already here when we have 9yr old girls getting jumped on busses and zero repercussions. Daily I see videos of whites getting pummeled.. Happy black History month.
 

Flint

Mentor
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
1,468
Batista may or may not have supported his early-life bodybuilding career with gay-4-pay (spoiler: he did, and so did Arnold). However, he's definitely on Team Homosexual. Imagine selling out a close personal friend like this:


Many such cases!
Batista is a dick. He is exactly the character he played in Guardians of the Galaxy. A muscle bound retard. Guys a big dopey liberal Trump-hating deranged POS.
 

El Gringo

Mentor
Joined
Feb 12, 2021
Messages
1,513
Batista may or may not have supported his early-life bodybuilding career with gay-4-pay (spoiler: he did, and so did Arnold). However, he's definitely on Team Homosexual. Imagine selling out a close personal friend like this:


Many such cases!

So he’s a literal B!!!ch! That’s bad news about Arnold, I loved that guy growing up. Nothing surprises me anymore with these deviants in Hollywood. These guys must have been molested as children because there’s no amount of money that a normal man would take to commit sodomy or be sodomized. Or they were compromised in other ways forcing them to commit these acts.
 

booth

Mentor
Joined
Jul 23, 2015
Messages
1,717
Sly Stallone, Chuck Conners, Ben Davidson, and Otis Sistrunk have had parts in porn movies. Davidson was in probably the most famous porn movie of all time, "Behind the Green Door."
 

El Gringo

Mentor
Joined
Feb 12, 2021
Messages
1,513
Sly Stallone, Chuck Conners, Ben Davidson, and Otis Sistrunk have had parts in porn movies. Davidson was in probably the most famous porn movie of all time, "Behind the Green Door."

Your comment sparked a memory. My grandparents were some of the first people to
Have a vcr and satellite tv in our small town. She would record movies for my brother and I. All of them were clean except one called “Big, Bad, Momma” the leading men were William Shatner and Tom Skerritt! If I remember right, they were pursuing two teenage girls, while having some wacky and fun adventures along the way! It was pure gold for two country boys in the late 80s. I think my younger brother started feeling guilty about it, and told my mom looking back I’m glad he did.
 

Phall

Master
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
2,159
Location
not Brooklyn
On the subject of Batista, he stars in the new M. Night Shyamalan film 'Knock at the Cabin.' I generally enjoy that Indian's films, so it wasn't a big leap of faith for me to give it a watch. Shyamalan is famous for his dramatic surprise twists at the end of his films, so I tried to go in reasonably-blind. Here's the wikipedia summary for 'Knock at the Cabin.'

While vacationing at a remote cabin in the woods, a young girl and her parents are taken hostage by four armed strangers who demand they make an unthinkable choice to avert the apocalypse. Confused, scared and with limited access to the outside world, the family must decide what they believe before all is lost.

That sounds fairly up-and-up. Within the first minutes, you realize that this "family" is an adopted Chinese girl and two homosexual men that adopted her. That trio is indeed vacationing in a remote cabin, where they are set upon by four random people who claim to have shared visions of the end of the world. The "family" must choose to sacrifice one of its members to prevent total apocolypse. Batista is the leader of the band (which also includes a white woman, a black woman, and a white man); he has the most dialogue and is definitely the top billing.

I usually wouldn't "spoil" this genre of films, but this one deserves its mockery and contempt. The world is indeed ending, and the longer the two homosexuals refuse to accept it, the more people around the world are enveloped by natural disasters. The band of home invaders begin to commit suicide in order so that the "family" may bear witness. A television in the cabin shows news reports of the mounting catastrophes. The homosexuals continue to resist as the world dies around them.

One of the gays has violent anger and identity issues. He is written as sympathetic through flashbacks where some homophobes were mean to him in a bar many years ago. Another flashback shows the episode of how the two gays lied to the hospital administration to secure the adoption of the newborn Chinese girl, with one of them posing as the "wife's brother." Batista has a line of dialogue that he believes "their family was chosen for this sacrifice because they have the most perfect form of love on the earth."

Eventually, time is up. Batista slits his own throat and leaves the two homosexuals to their decision of whether to stop the world from ending or survive and walk alone. There is no moment where they must embrace faith: planes are now visibly falling out of the sky (above their wilderness cabin, mind you). So, the friendly gay finally tells the angry gay to kill him. He does and drives off with his kidnapped girl. They walk into the nearest rest station and find a crowd of people staring at the TV news, where reporters are jubilantly reporting that all flood waters receded, fires evaporated, and the remaining planes all landed safely. The gays have saved the world!

There was no plot twist at all. The homosexuality of the main characters was not some benign hat tip from the production studio - it was central to the plot of gays saving the world with their Christ-like sacrifice. There really was no explicit mention of faith or God at all. That millions of people around the world died before the gays faced the music is completely unaddressed. The whole movie is a celebration of sodomy-driven "love" and the revamped family unit. I would objectively argue that the homosexuals really aren't sympathetic characters here, and the portrayals of their "persecution" in this movie are cliched and unrealistic. Oh, and that nameless white male character I mentioned earlier? It turns out he was a homophobe who attacked one of the gays in the bar ten years earlier. No redemption arc for him; he was just a bad guy.

I'm aware that Hollywood has been testing the limits lately with homo weirdness. There was an all-gay "rom-com" recently, and it's commonplace to shoehorn casually-gay characters into an ensemble cast. This film didn't have a big budget, but the Shyamalan name carries weight and will draw a wide audience. I would estimate that this is the most concerted effort yet to promote faggotry through the film medium onto a captive audience. While I'm ashamed to have watched through the whole thing, I can draw solace from the fact that I streamed it illegally through a bootleg site and did not reward these perverts with a dime. If this writeup keeps a few of you from watching, all the better.

Back to Batista: the recent Ivan Provorov episode with the NHL rainbow warmups reminds us that it only takes one man to stand up and say no. It's much more common to see people shrug their shoulders and go along with the agenda. In Batista's case, he's not indifferent to the anal rampage agenda: he opens wide and shouts, "Yes! Yes! Yes!"
 

booth

Mentor
Joined
Jul 23, 2015
Messages
1,717
Your comment sparked a memory. My grandparents were some of the first people to
Have a vcr and satellite tv in our small town. She would record movies for my brother and I. All of them were clean except one called “Big, Bad, Momma” the leading men were William Shatner and Tom Skerritt! If I remember right, they were pursuing two teenage girls, while having some wacky and fun adventures along the way! It was pure gold for two country boys in the late 80s. I think my younger brother started feeling guilty about it, and told my mom looking back I’m glad he did.
I remember that movie for one reason, Miss Angie Dickinson. She was a beautiful woman.
 

Freethinker

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 3, 2008
Messages
6,974
Location
Suffolk County, NY
On the subject of Batista, he stars in the new M. Night Shyamalan film 'Knock at the Cabin.' I generally enjoy that Indian's films, so it wasn't a big leap of faith for me to give it a watch. Shyamalan is famous for his dramatic surprise twists at the end of his films, so I tried to go in reasonably-blind. Here's the wikipedia summary for 'Knock at the Cabin.'



That sounds fairly up-and-up. Within the first minutes, you realize that this "family" is an adopted Chinese girl and two homosexual men that adopted her. That trio is indeed vacationing in a remote cabin, where they are set upon by four random people who claim to have shared visions of the end of the world. The "family" must choose to sacrifice one of its members to prevent total apocolypse. Batista is the leader of the band (which also includes a white woman, a black woman, and a white man); he has the most dialogue and is definitely the top billing.

I usually wouldn't "spoil" this genre of films, but this one deserves its mockery and contempt. The world is indeed ending, and the longer the two homosexuals refuse to accept it, the more people around the world are enveloped by natural disasters. The band of home invaders begin to commit suicide in order so that the "family" may bear witness. A television in the cabin shows news reports of the mounting catastrophes. The homosexuals continue to resist as the world dies around them.

One of the gays has violent anger and identity issues. He is written as sympathetic through flashbacks where some homophobes were mean to him in a bar many years ago. Another flashback shows the episode of how the two gays lied to the hospital administration to secure the adoption of the newborn Chinese girl, with one of them posing as the "wife's brother." Batista has a line of dialogue that he believes "their family was chosen for this sacrifice because they have the most perfect form of love on the earth."

Eventually, time is up. Batista slits his own throat and leaves the two homosexuals to their decision of whether to stop the world from ending or survive and walk alone. There is no moment where they must embrace faith: planes are now visibly falling out of the sky (above their wilderness cabin, mind you). So, the friendly gay finally tells the angry gay to kill him. He does and drives off with his kidnapped girl. They walk into the nearest rest station and find a crowd of people staring at the TV news, where reporters are jubilantly reporting that all flood waters receded, fires evaporated, and the remaining planes all landed safely. The gays have saved the world!

There was no plot twist at all. The homosexuality of the main characters was not some benign hat tip from the production studio - it was central to the plot of gays saving the world with their Christ-like sacrifice. There really was no explicit mention of faith or God at all. That millions of people around the world died before the gays faced the music is completely unaddressed. The whole movie is a celebration of sodomy-driven "love" and the revamped family unit. I would objectively argue that the homosexuals really aren't sympathetic characters here, and the portrayals of their "persecution" in this movie are cliched and unrealistic. Oh, and that nameless white male character I mentioned earlier? It turns out he was a homophobe who attacked one of the gays in the bar ten years earlier. No redemption arc for him; he was just a bad guy.

I'm aware that Hollywood has been testing the limits lately with homo weirdness. There was an all-gay "rom-com" recently, and it's commonplace to shoehorn casually-gay characters into an ensemble cast. This film didn't have a big budget, but the Shyamalan name carries weight and will draw a wide audience. I would estimate that this is the most concerted effort yet to promote faggotry through the film medium onto a captive audience. While I'm ashamed to have watched through the whole thing, I can draw solace from the fact that I streamed it illegally through a bootleg site and did not reward these perverts with a dime. If this writeup keeps a few of you from watching, all the better.

Back to Batista: the recent Ivan Provorov episode with the NHL rainbow warmups reminds us that it only takes one man to stand up and say no. It's much more common to see people shrug their shoulders and go along with the agenda. In Batista's case, he's not indifferent to the anal rampage agenda: he opens wide and shouts, "Yes! Yes! Yes!"
Thank you for the warning. I was unlikely to watch but now will tell others to steer clear as well.
 
Joined
Sep 11, 2020
Messages
295
You all should read Donald Jeffries' second to latest column. It's pretty good, and accurate.


Two paragraphs:

"No, my ire is directed at the alleged “alternative” to the mad hatters that run the “Woke” Democratic Party. The Republicans, even with their reverence for the rigged marketplace, chrony capitalism, and “greed is good” author and philosopher Ayn Rand, at least don’t appear to be bats@#t crazy. But they are very, very stupid. And completely out of touch. They probably don’t realize, or care, that 80 percent of the athletes in the sports they worship are Black. Or that probably an even higher percentage of the entertainers they respect are Black. They believe the market decides, and the market is always fair. Sports and entertainment are a meritocracy.

Since Blacks are only 12 percent of the U.S. population, this is a wild disproportion that should be questioned. But there’s as much chance of anyone questioning that as there is of someone asking why the heads of every major television network and motion picture studio are Jews, a group that is a much smaller minority in America, at just 2 percent of the populace. But instead, the “Woke” Left is upset that there are six Catholics on the present Supreme Court. So they do notice some things like that. Some disproportionate representation is more equal than others."
 
Top