GA Senate Stands Against Microchip Implants

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
Hats off to the Georgia state Senate for opposing mandatory/involuntary microchips.
smiley32.gif
I think they suspect this forthcoming from the Feds. The Fed "spychip" mandate will probably be in conjunction with martial law (following another false-flag "attack"). Hopefully, this bill becomes law...asap.

Georgia Senate opposes forcing microchips into people

By Ty Tagami

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Georgians worried about having miniature computer circuits inserted into their bodies without their consent can rest a little easier now that their state lawmakers have taken action.

The state Senate voted overwhelmingly Thursday for legislation that would prohibit involuntary implantation of microchips in any body part.

"By passing this bill, we are sending the message that Georgia is committed to upholding its citizens' constitutional rights and protection of their person,"Â￾ the bill's author, Sen. Chip Pearson (R-Dawsonville), said in a written statement. He said technology is moving fast and "we must be careful that it doesn't come at the harm of citizens. The benefits of a microchip that can be internally implanted are also available in many external forms."Â￾

The Senate voted 47-2 in favor of the bill.

The Internet is awash with rumors about the government inserting microchips into people's heads without their consent or knowledge. This bill would prohibit that.

If Senate Bill 235 becomes law, it would ban microchip implantation against a person's will regardless of that person's age.

The Microchip Consent Act of 2010 defines a "microchip" as "any microdevice, sensor, transmitter, mechanism, electronically readable marking, or nanotechnology that is passively or actively capable of transmitting or receiving information."

The legislation exempts pacemakers from its prohibition.

The act would amend the assault and battery portion of the Georgia code to make it illegal to require insertion in exchange for any benefit, including employment, promotion or "any means that causes a person to acquiesce."

The bill would make involuntary installations a misdemeanor, and it would establish penalties for unwanted insertions. It also would create guidelines for voluntary implantation and require that only physicians put microchips into people.

***Reference article...
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
DixieDestroyer said:
The Senate voted 47-2 in favor of the bill.


It's a sad state of affairs when "our" leadership is actually putting this science fiction daydream to a lawful vote. Who on earth would be in favor of this (2 reptiles in the Georgia senate, obviously)?

I'd wager that this microchip idea, if ever "law,"Â￾ will only be installed into whites"¦most of whom are basically robots learning new tricks from the TV anyway.Edited by: Thrashen
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,188
Location
Pennsylvania
Thrashen said:
It's a sad state of affairs when "our" leadership is actually putting this science fiction daydream to a lawful vote. Who on earth would be in favor of this (2 reptiles in the Georgia senate, obviously)?

I'd wager that this microchip idea, if ever "law,"Â￾ will only be installed into whites"¦most of whom are basically robots learning new tricks from the TV anyway.

I was thinking the same thing. I'm old enough to remember such now quaint expressions as "it can't happen here." Oh yes it can, and it has. The rush toward technology-fueled Orwellian totalitarianism has been breathtaking, with no opposition from either of the two nearly identical political gangs, and promoted by the government's media arm, both through "news" reports designed to instill fear and paranoia in the masses, and through television series which glorify torture and the demonization and dehumanization of selected internal and external "enemies."Edited by: Don Wassall
 
Top