Fun Statistics from the 2012 NFL Regular Season

[Awake in America]

4 of the top 8 tacklers in the NFL are white (including #1). 50% of the starting linebackers in the NFL are NOT white.

4 of the top 9 sackers in the NFL are white (including #1). 44% of the starting DEs and linebackers in the NFL are NOT white.

9 of the top 10 QBs in passing yards are white (and 19 of the top 21). More than 10% of the starting QBs in the NFL ARE non-white.

Out of the 5 top TEs in receiving yards, 3 are white, an additional 1 is non-black, and the 5th is so light that he is often mistaken for a white player.

I don't know how the DWFs do it. Compared to the general population, whites are underrepresented in the NFL, save at QB, where they are STILL overrepresented among the elite. Those defensive stats are the real eye opener. Given the sometimes 100% black defensive lineups, whites are very overrepresented among the leaders in sacks and tackles. Pretty impressive for players who "lack explosiveness", etc... :frusty:

 

[jaxvid]

4 of the top 8 tacklers in the NFL are white (including #1). 50% of the starting linebackers in the NFL are NOT white.

4 of the top 9 sackers in the NFL are white (including #1). 44% of the starting DEs and linebackers in the NFL are NOT white.

9 of the top 10 QBs in passing yards are white (and 19 of the top 21). More than 10% of the starting QBs in the NFL ARE non-white.

Out of the 5 top TEs in receiving yards, 3 are white, an additional 1 is non-black, and the 5th is so light that he is often mistaken for a white player.

I don't know how the DWFs do it. Compared to the general population, whites are underrepresented in the NFL, save at QB, where they are STILL overrepresented among the elite. Those defensive stats are the real eye opener. Given the sometimes 100% black defensive lineups, whites are very overrepresented among the leaders in sacks and tackles. Pretty impressive for players who "lack explosiveness", etc... :frusty:

Someone should run the numbers. I think this is an effect of racial discrimination against an obviously talented ethnic group. For example when professional baseball broke the color line in the 1950's there was an untapped reservoir of black baseball players. Since the bigs had their pick of players they started slowly signing the black superstar players. By the early 1960's they had drained the black talent pool and it seemed like every black player in the Majors was a superstar.

It led to the false notion that black players were superior baseball players. A myth that was soon exploded by the early 1970's when there were lots of crappy black baseball players. The game would have returned to it's normal racial dynamic, 80% White or so but the hispanic invasion changed the numbers by opening up another previously untapped talent pool. The fact that blacks are not great ball players is now obvious but the old guard that still runs baseball is stuck in the 1950-60's when that didn't appear to be true. That's why guys like Bud Selig keep thinking there is some undiscovered hidden invisible black baseball league that is hiding all that black baseball talent, and by gum Bud is going to spend as much money as is possible to find it.

A similar thing has happened in football as blacks were mixed in with White players in the old days and since there were fewer of them it seemed as if the few that were there was made up of all great players. That led to the idea that they were ALL great. Baseball was unable to hide the deterioration of the talent level created by artificially inflating the number of black players and it happened in an era when the marxy-cultists were not running things so it was a-ok to go back to larger White numbers. That kind of race reversal leading to a more normal state is now verboten in the US of Americrap thanks to white guilt, black whining, and elite anti-White bigotry.

So we here at CF can see how bad the NFL product is, but the always blind DWF's think the level of play is at the highest it's ever been. NFL marketing, and a mega-sports-brainwashing complex, has helped put the blinders on most fans. Some rule changes have also helped.

No one asks the obvious question: if the only Whites that are playing are doing so good, why aren't there more of them? That was the question asked back in the day about blacks. Unfortunately the double standard that is rigidly enforced in all sectors of society keeps this question from being asked ANYWHERE in the universe except at castefootball.us

 

[Awake in America]

Someone should run the numbers. I think this is an effect of racial discrimination against an obviously talented ethnic group. For example when professional baseball broke the color line in the 1950's there was an untapped reservoir of black baseball players. Since the bigs had their pick of players they started slowly signing the black superstar players. By the early 1960's they had drained the black talent pool and it seemed like every black player in the Majors was a superstar.

It led to the false notion that black players were superior baseball players. A myth that was soon exploded by the early 1970's when there were lots of crappy black baseball players. The game would have returned to it's normal racial dynamic, 80% White or so but the hispanic invasion changed the numbers by opening up another previously untapped talent pool. The fact that blacks are not great ball players is now obvious but the old guard that still runs baseball is stuck in the 1950-60's when that didn't appear to be true. That's why guys like Bud Selig keep thinking there is some undiscovered hidden invisible black baseball league that is hiding all that black baseball talent, and by gum Bud is going to spend as much money as is possible to find it.

A similar thing has happened in football as blacks were mixed in with White players in the old days and since there were fewer of them it seemed as if the few that were there was made up of all great players. That led to the idea that they were ALL great. Baseball was unable to hide the deterioration of the talent level created by artificially inflating the number of black players and it happened in an era when the marxy-cultists were not running things so it was a-ok to go back to larger White numbers. That kind of race reversal leading to a more normal state is now verboten in the US of Americrap thanks to white guilt, black whining, and elite anti-White bigotry.

So we here at CF can see how bad the NFL product is, but the always blind DWF's think the level of play is at the highest it's ever been. NFL marketing, and a mega-sports-brainwashing complex, has helped put the blinders on most fans. Some rule changes have also helped.

No one asks the obvious question: if the only Whites that are playing are doing so good, why aren't there more of them? That was the question asked back in the day about blacks. Unfortunately the double standard that is rigidly enforced in all sectors of society keeps this question from being asked ANYWHERE in the universe except at castefootball.us

While it is showing up at receiver, the shocking stuff to me is on defense. The only white players that exist on defense are outstanding players (I exaggerate). Even so, it's A.J. Hawk, Rob Ninkovich and Chase Blackburn that the DWFs want to run off every August, only to praise them come December.

Your baseball analogy is interesting. There is no doubt that some players from the Negro Leagues could play and star in MLB. That some could and did, while others looked a lot like them, led to an explosion of black players, and it did come to an end. Baseball might be tougher for the caste system in the long run. It's so stat driven, and they pretty much don't lie. There's no "hip swivel" involved. You can either hit a curve ball, or you can't. Baseball integrated with outstanding players, which is what you would expect, and the "I've got to get (buy) me one of those" mentality was strong. Same goes for how the SEC integrated football. So what if you couldn't actually get another Jackie Robinson; there were lots of guys that looked just like him.

I don't know why, but with the arrival of Wes Welker, a most unlikely hero in the era of the 6'5" WR, things seem to be slowly turning. The usual suspects are hyping the black quarterbacks as always, but more white players seem to be busting through the barrier at odd places, even if there are fewer total in the league. Peyton Hillis's 2010 season was a part of it, and now Watt is nearing superstar status. This next draft is going to make for some interesting DWF reactions. What does one say when his team drafts a defender that looks like J.J. Watt or Clay Matthews? When it's his turn to draft in fantasy football, he needs a WR, and there's Eric Decker available........ what does a lardass, drunken, white eunuch do? It's getting to the point where the absurdity will be hard to hide.

 

[Tannehill17]

Its so hard to point out these stats (even when you have the cold hard numbers right in front of you as this thread does) to the DWF's. They live in this colorblind, egalitarian world and don't want to be be bothered with facts, logic, and reason. They insist that us evil conservative 'racists' have some sort of an agenda even though facts and statistics prove otherwise. Its a very frustrating endeavor.

 

[Don Wassall]

It's more a kneejerk herd mentality that's been thoroughly conditioned to follow cues, including very subtle visual and verbal ones, from the corporate media. Manipulation of the masses through the media is perhaps the most powerful tool of control in human history, though it also has ended up causing one major f'ed up dysfunctional society.

I agree with jaxvid's analysis, which has been mentioned before. You have to admire the character and determination of White NFL players, who have to compete in an organizational, media and fan atmosphere crafted for decades to benefit blacks. The high success rate of so many of the White draft choices taken in the early rounds the past several years is very encouraging, as is the continued high flop rate of black ones. Those guys are targets for criticism from the day they're drafted, and they're responding admirably.

A couple more fun facts: Three of the top eight wide receivers in the AFC this season are White. Jordy Nelson would have been near the top in the NFC had he stayed healthy. And the top three AFC offenses in yardage are also the three with the highest number of White starters in the league -- New England, Denver and Houston.

 

[jaxvid]

Am I missing something here? How is it 4 out of 9 if Chris Long, the supposed 4th guy, is tied at 11.5 with 4 other guys? Isn't that 4 out of 13?

1 20.5 J.J. Watt, DE HOU
2 19.5 Aldon Smith, LB SF
3 18.5 Von Miller, LB DEN
4 15.0 Cameron Wake, LB MIA
5 13.0 Clay Matthews, LB GB
6 12.5 Geno Atkins, DT CIN
7 12.5 Charles Johnson, DE CAR
8 12.0 Jared Allen, DE MIN
9 11.5 Chris Clemons, DE SEA
9 11.5 Michael Johnson, DE CIN
9 11.5 Chris Long, DE STL
9 11.5 Julius Peppers, DE CHI
9 11.5 DeMarcus Ware, LB DAL

Thanks for signing up just to be a douche. 4 out of the top 9 SPOTS are held by White players. Is that better for you?? Still impressive, and still makes the point.

 

[dwid]

what makes Clay Matthews stats more impressive is the fact that he missed 4 games.

 

[Awake in America]

Am I missing something here? How is it 4 out of 9 if Chris Long, the supposed 4th guy, is tied at 11.5 with 4 other guys? Isn't that 4 out of 13?

1 20.5 J.J. Watt, DE HOU
2 19.5 Aldon Smith, LB SF
3 18.5 Von Miller, LB DEN
4 15.0 Cameron Wake, LB MIA
5 13.0 Clay Matthews, LB GB
6 12.5 Geno Atkins, DT CIN
7 12.5 Charles Johnson, DE CAR
8 12.0 Jared Allen, DE MIN
9 11.5 Chris Clemons, DE SEA
9 11.5 Michael Johnson, DE CIN
9 11.5 Chris Long, DE STL
9 11.5 Julius Peppers, DE CHI
9 11.5 DeMarcus Ware, LB DAL

Okay, Phoenix, how's this:

1 out of the top 1 sackers in the NFL is white. Or 2 of the top 5, or 3 of the top 8. Hell, even 4 of the top 13 destroys the idiocy of current wisdom on "athleticism" on defense. There's only 4 white guys on the entire second page of those stats, but there's 8 on page one??? Interestingly, by the time you get to page 3, you are no longer really talking about pass rushers, but about LBs and DTs that manage a few sacks along the way. Suddenly, Hawk, Blackburn, and Greenway show up again; as do guys that rarely play (like Karl Klug or Garrett McIntyre), but produce sacks when they do. Anytime you see a distribution like that, warning bells should go off. It doesn't make sense ........ unless there is something else going on.

 

[Vanilla Ice Berg]

Great posts gentlemen. Wait until Bjorn Woerner gets into the league next year. With a healthy Jarred Allen expect the top 4 out of 8 sack leaders to be of the caucasian persuasion.


-Vanilla-

 

[Tannehill17]

Great posts gentlemen. Wait until Bjorn Woerner gets into the league next year. With a healthy Jarred Allen expect the top 4 out of 8 sack leaders to be of the caucasian persuasion.


-Vanilla-

I'm hoping the Dolphins draft Werner. The guy is going to be a beast in this league. Most of the DWF's on Dolphins message boards however think Barkevious Mingo is a better prospect. What kind of name is 'Barkevious' anyway? :huh:

 

[Vanilla Ice Berg]

I'm hoping the Dolphins draft Werner. The guy is going to be a beast in this league. Most of the DWF's on Dolphins message boards however think Barkevious Mingo is a better prospect. What kind of name is 'Barkevious' anyway? :huh:

I am not a football expert but then again who is? My only complaint of Woerner is that he might be on the light side. I am wondering if he might be moved to Outside lb or some other position unfamiliar to him. He is an unblievable talent though on a team full of overhyped bafoons.
I think as Tannehill develops in the upcoming years who will have the more heralded career, RG 3 or the just as athletically gifted Tannehill?

 

[Tannehill17]

I think as Tannehill develops in the upcoming years who will have the more heralded career, RG 3 or the just as athletically gifted Tannehill?

I think Tannehill will have the better overall career. For as raw as Tannehill was coming out of college, I thought he had a decent rookie season. Of course, don't tell that to the DWF's on websites like Finheaven who are ready to run him out of town just because he didn't throw for 6000 years and 50 TDs. I will admit that RG3 has looked impressive as a rookie but like most black QB's he'll probably hit a wall much like Daunte Culpepper and Mike Vick before him. Black QB's always seem to get figured out and are unable to adapt their game to the adjusting defenses. Another thing that hurts him is he's already been injured twice in only 16 games. That doesn't bode well for his future in this league. I predict he'll have a major injury ala Daunte Culpepper and we'll forever hear about how 'great' RG3 could have been had injuries not hampered his career.

 

[Vanilla Ice Berg]

I think Tannehill will have the better overall career. For as raw as Tannehill was coming out of college, I thought he had a decent rookie season. Of course, don't tell that to the DWF's on websites like Finheaven who are ready to run him out of town just because he didn't throw for 6000 years and 50 TDs. I will admit that RG3 has looked impressive as a rookie but like most black QB's he'll probably hit a wall much like Daunte Culpepper and Mike Vick before him. Black QB's always seem to get figured out and are unable to adapt their game to the adjusting defenses. Another thing that hurts him is he's already been injured twice in only 16 games. That doesn't bode well for his future in this league. I predict he'll have a major injury ala Daunte Culpepper and we'll forever hear about how 'great' RG3 could have been had injuries not hampered his career.

RG III is a quality rookie qb but he is no Andrew Luck and in my opinion Griffin has a better surrounding cast though Washington's affletic secondary is atrocious.
I think most of the posters here know Tannehill spent most of his time at wr the first 3 years and what was so impressive for his size was he had the ability to run after the catch. I have not seen Miami play much this year but with Tannehill's overall athletic ability he should be given more draws and throws rolling out of the pocket.
I still believe Hartline is a # 1 wr but he could use some help. Davone Bess and the rest of a sub-par receiving core did not help Tannehill or Hartline. If the Skins lose their playoff game I think RG III's image will still not be tarnished. We need a second year to expose him for the Cam Newton in waiting he probably is. He CANNOT throw downfield consistently.

 

[PVDuffer]

RG III Rookie of the Year

RG III is a quality rookie qb but he is no Andrew Luck and in my opinion Griffin has a better surrounding cast though Washington's affletic secondary is atrocious.
I think most of the posters here know Tannehill spent most of his time at wr the first 3 years and what was so impressive for his size was he had the ability to run after the catch. I have not seen Miami play much this year but with Tannehill's overall athletic ability he should be given more draws and throws rolling out of the pocket.
I still believe Hartline is a # 1 wr but he could use some help. Davone Bess and the rest of a sub-par receiving core did not help Tannehill or Hartline. If the Skins lose their playoff game I think RG III's image will still not be tarnished. We need a second year to expose him for the Cam Newton in waiting he probably is. He CANNOT throw downfield consistently.

I totally agree with you that the NFL will be ready for RG III next year when he will get "Newtonized", but with the 4Letter Network beating the drums, I expect him to get the NFL's 2012 rookie of the year award. Heck the commentators already had him in the Hall of Fame halfway through this season. Andrew Luck will place second in the voting (his color will cost him votes) and everyone will tell us how good he is BUT ------- that RGIII is better.

 

[Don Wassall]

Here's an interesting stat care of Weenieworld. The best runners in the league only make tacklers miss an average of four times or less per game (on roughly 20 carries). Aren't black runners supposed to have fantastic "loose hips" and elusivenss? Tell me again why Whites aren't allowed to play the position.

According to Pro Football Focus, Alfred Morris caused 57 missed tackles in the regular season. That's third-most in the league behind only Adrian Peterson (64) and Marshawn Lynch (58). While not considered especially elusive, Morris' total is nearly double the 29 missed tackles Arian Foster caused. Morris continues his impressive rookie season on Sunday against the Seahawks' tenth-ranked run defense.

 

[Mischling3rdDegree]

Am I missing something here? How is it 4 out of 9 if Chris Long, the supposed 4th guy, is tied at 11.5 with 4 other guys? Isn't that 4 out of 13?

I really hope this post wasn't why he was banned. Because he's exactly right.

Just because we see bad math ("maff"?) used on TV to prop up black players doesn't mean we should be using bad math to overstate the case for white players.

 

[Don Wassall]

I really hope this post wasn't why he was banned. Because he's exactly right.

Just because we see bad math ("maff"?) used on TV to prop up black players doesn't mean we should be using bad math to overstate the case for white players.

He was an open troll. His other posts were deleted.