whiteathlete33
Hall of Famer
You are correct Parody. It should be the fight of the year just like the Adamek-Cunningham was the best fight of 2008.
whiteathlete33 said:This was a real fight. Not like the one with Froch and Dirrell where the b-tch Dirrell ran the whole fight.
f3dor said:i gaveit to froch, but am pleased for kessler. Its means that all the white fighters are all still in it.
<div></div>
<div>117-111,are you kiding me???</div>
<div></div>
whiteathlete33 said:f3dor said:i gaveit to froch, but am pleased for kessler. Its means that all the white fighters are all still in it.
117-111,are you kiding me???
How could you give that fight to Froch? I clearly had Kessler ahead in the fight by at least several rounds. There is no doubt about the results.
f3dor said:whiteathlete33 said:f3dor said:i gaveit to froch, but am pleased for kessler. Its means that all the white fighters are all still in it.
<div></div>
<div>117-111,are you kiding me???</div>
<div></div>
How could you give that fight to Froch? I clearly had Kessler ahead in the fight by at least several rounds. There is no doubt about the results.
<div></div>
<div>clean effective punches you have to give it to froch. If you are scoring on who was bussier, then kessler takes it, but several rounds?you having a joke right. maybe by two rounds at best.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Top uk newspaper agrees with me..</div>
<div></div>
<div>http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2010/apr/25/carl-froch-mikkel-kessler</div>
whiteathlete33 said:f3dor said:whiteathlete33 said:f3dor said:i gaveit to froch, but am pleased for kessler. Its means that all the white fighters are all still in it.
117-111,are you kiding me???
How could you give that fight to Froch? I clearly had Kessler ahead in the fight by at least several rounds. There is no doubt about the results.
clean effective punches you have to give it to froch. If you are scoring on who was bussier, then kessler takes it, but several rounds?you having a joke right. maybe by two rounds at best.
Top uk newspaper agrees with me..
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2010/apr/25/carl-froch-mikkel-kessler
Sorry buddy!! I watched the whole fight and if you look at my earlier posts I had Froch dominating the first few rounds but Kessler everything after that. He probably won by 3 or 4 rounds.
The Hock said:If they had fought in England Froch could have been given the decision. It was a very close fight.
I think Kessler is past his prime. At times he resorted to just flailing away, which is enough in your home town. He looks to have lost something off his fastball.
He's not the same fighter he was a few years ago. It happens on the other side of thirty.
I don't think Kessler will win another fight in the tournament.
I'm still depressed from the NFL draft, and I have go to the dentist tomorrow.
Westside said:Kesseler won that fight by 4 rds. Frochy did too much posing. That last rd was great.
Kelly Pavlik should take note on Kesseler. I believe the change in trainers made the difference in continuing the Super Six or going home. Kelly needs to switch trainers for the rematch with Martinez.
It was a career saving victory for Kesseler.
Westside said:Bro have you heard the phrase "would've, could've and should've" that applied to Froch. That slip in the 5th was proved to a slip not a knock down by slow motion. What friggn general concensus!
So what if press row or Al scored it for Froch, they must have smoked something or drank too much.
I like Froch but I think your man crush on him is tinting your objectivity.
f3dor I think you dreaming. I only calls it as I sees it.
Westside said:Ok everyone has an opinion. Ours differ. On to the next fight. The fight I'm looking forward to is Mosely v Mayweather. Man, I hope Mosely can ko gayweather.