Dumping the South's race problem on the North

dwid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
4,254
Location
Louisiana
Where are these southern places with all of these White girls with blacks? I LIVE here and don't see it that often. You described the people I really don't want in our gene pool, which is pretty much the only type of interracial mixing I see, black thugs, usually with a White girl that is strung out on drugs, the hard **** like heroin and crack. I guess they stay with the guy because he has a steady supply of these drugs. If the girl looks good, there is a good chance she is a stripper, which basically means she is a prostitute because its kind of an unspoken rule for the french quarter strip clubs, those girls will have sex people if they pay for the "vip rooms". I know this because my brother dated a stripper for a "classy" club back in the day. I helped her with a paper once and what she had was at the level of a 4th grader, yet she was a sophomore in college with good grades. Of course she dropped out, thinking thousands of dollars a night was going to keep her financially secure for her future when she would spend most of it. Like they are going to want her when she gets older. If they are lucky they wind up at the clubs on side streets with people outside trying to heckle you to come inside and question your sexuality when you don't, and those girls are probably in their 30's. None of the clubs are going to want them when they get close to 40.

You might see them and their mixed babies outside of a methadone clinic or a needle exchange. Working as a counselor, a good deal of these women aren't even from here, they're from places like Portland or Seattle that ran away from daddy to be rebellious. Should we really care about trashy White women being weeded out of our gene pool? Is it that big of a deal? You have to look pretty hard to find them, so not sure where everyone is seeing them at. What kind of hotells/motels are you staying at? They aren't at the places I take my family to, unless for whatever reason we wind up at Wal Mart, which isn't that often. I have been to Colorado and it seems worse, White girls that seem normal with an uncle tom. I lived in Atlanta after Katrina for a little while and didn't see it that often either. New Orleans and Atlanta are two big cities in the South. I have visited other places in the South but not long enough to make an educated guess.

as far as the CSA, what would they have done with blacks? Everyone says we should have picked our own cotton, but it was only about 10 percent that owned the majority of slaves. My ancestors didn't. They came over from Ireland after the Civil War.
 
Last edited:

Wes Woodhead

Mentor
Joined
Oct 23, 2011
Messages
1,104
People in the north have always sat up on a high horse, and patted themselves on the back for being better than us dirty southerners. It seems that has never changed.

THe thing is outside of the major cities in the north there aint really no blacks. THe northerners are blessed enough to live in a world where they arent at EVERY public place you go ALL hours of the day, and night. From Texas all the way to Virginia, and everywhere in between there are black goons everywhere. We are born around them, and we go to school with them. Where we are fed the most intense propaganda ever drummed up.

I dont doubt there are more black male/white female couples in the south. I mean I see them often, but its not some genetic flaw. Its because of the over the top propaganda that has made them feel guilty for being not only white, but southern.

As far as Abe Lincons war of oppression goes, well only a fool, or a brainwashed person would side with the blue bellies on that one. Even just a small amount of study on Abe Lincons war of tyranny proves that the Union was the aggressors, and the morally inferior side. The south just wanted to be left alone, but the Union needed the southern productivity to survive. Abe Lincon wanted big government, and big banks. Congats to ol dishonest Abe.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
703
THe thing is outside of the major cities in the north there aint really no blacks. THe northerners are blessed enough to live in a world where they arent at EVERY public place you go ALL hours of the day, and night. From Texas all the way to Virginia, and everywhere in between there are black goons everywhere. We are born around them, and we go to school with them. Where we are fed the most intense propaganda ever drummed up.

... Congats to ol dishonest Abe.
:amen:

I find that proximity to Blacks is always the key factor in Whites' attitudes on them. Southerners have had the most historical & daily contact and competition with Blacks, & have subsequently formed the most pessimistic attitudes about Blacks.
Insulated White liberals, who have little to no contact with them, have the most idealistic & positive attitudes. If we all switched places, we'd probably fall into the same pattern, I keep that in mind when I'm talking about race with well-intentioned (but dopey)Libs.

and Lincoln is the timeless hero of Libs, but they seem to gloss over the fact that Lincoln was so despised that half the country tried to leave on his watch.. even bums like Carter & Obama don't have that on their resume'

get your flags up ~
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
I've lived in various places around the South and also traveled a good bit around the country. I don't think all those travels have given me an accurate picture of the problem in those areas, but after long term connections to people in some of those areas, you begin to learn more about how common such behavior is. I've seen more miscegenation in the Atlanta metro area that anyplace else I've lived or been. Of course, Atlanta itself is majority black and the metro area has high numbers of blacks. Second worst is the Shreveport area and that was 20 years ago. Shreveport also has a high number of blacks. I remember being shocked by seeing it then when we moved to LA, about like I was shocked after moving to GA a few years ago. Third worst would be Northern Utah (I found it to be a quickly growing trend there, although it isn't usually a White with a black), and fourth worst would be Central Illinois (a region that doesn't have as many blacks as those two Southern areas). The area I call home has a higher number of blacks than any of these four regions I just mentioned, but miscegenation is extremely rare there. In my view, it is a much more complex issue than can be explained just by looking at where many Whites and non-whites are living in close proximity to each other.
 

scroat

Guru
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
217
People in the north have always sat up on a high horse, and patted themselves on the back for being better than us dirty southerners. It seems that has never changed.*

I don't think that's true and it wasnt the point I was trying to make. The only point I was trying to make is that it is dangerously naive to believe that many modern day southerners are racially aware. They aren't. Most northerners aren't either. Its just how it is unfortunately.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,520
Location
Pennsylvania
As has been mentioned a number of times before, the SEC (and ACC) stadiums packed in the fall with 75,000 rabid DWFs rooting for pretty much coal black teams is a telling commentary that the South is in no immediate danger of rising again and that Whites in every region of the country have been very effectively homogenized culturally (i.e. deracinated).
 

Tannehill17

Mentor
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Messages
1,381
Location
Miami FL
I'm not sure where exactly I stand on the whole North vs South front. I'm a white person of (Euro) Cuban (Spanish and French) stock from Miami. Miami isn't exactly considered the south. In fact, Balkanization has already taken place here. In the early 1980's there were riots here caused by blacks when a Cuban-American police officer killed a black motorist. I'd probably say I identify myself more with the South simply because Miami was a nice place to live in the 60's (I wasn't born yet but I do know what it was like) and it had a laid back Southern atmosphere. I really wish I could have grown up in the Miami of that time. Life before the communist civil rights movement had to have been great. In those days we had something called Freedom of Association. A freedom that has long since been thrown out the window. It was the North (blue states) that forced blacks on us. However I do agree with MiamiHeatFan that if the South won the civil war, we would probably be just as Balkanized as well as our infrastructure being much weaker.
 

scroat

Guru
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
217
#33Robert Gremlin the Turd*Caste Football GuruJoin DateDec 2012LocationMiami FLPosts190I'm not sure where exactly I stand on the whole North vs South front

There's shouldnt be a north vs south issue among us. If likeminded individuals split over something so stupid than good f*ckin luck to all of us.
 

Menelik

Mentor
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Messages
1,175
Location
Georgia
As has been mentioned a number of times before, the SEC (and ACC) stadiums packed in the fall with 75,000 rabid DWFs rooting for pretty much coal black teams is a telling commentary that the South is in no immediate danger of rising again and that Whites in every region of the country have been very effectively homogenized culturally (i.e. deracinated).

Pretty much the reason why I don't follow sports like I used to. As far as miscegrenation goes I live in the black belt in Southern Georgia and there is very little, at least openly, going on. HOWEVER I do remember when I was stationed at Ft. Lewis in the late 70s a white man couldn't even get the time a day from a white woman in Tacoma, Washington.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
fair enough..
I have a thought on modern secession..
I'm a proud Southerner, but I wouldn't want it to happen.., bcuz I think states can still distinguish their destinies w/out leaving the Union.

I remember when David Duke ran for gov. of Louisiana; the guy almost won.. even with his own party & the media at-large working against him. If you look at the election results, Duke carried a number of parishes.. but bcuz the governorship is an all-or-nothing election, Duke supporters got nothing.
I always thought Duke should've subsequently started a political party in his state & run like-minded candidates in those friendly parishes. Who knows how many local & state level positions Duke allies could've won (?) It may have made a difference in the way their state does business. Guys like Duke can change their states, with or without explicit racial politicking.. those guys would make their counties & states more liveable, and are really in the mold of real states-rights Southerners.

(Red parishes are the ones Duke won in '91 election)


I also believe a modern secession wouldn't break just North-South..



Amongst the white voters he DID win...and yes they trotted out all their traitors in his own party - like Pat Buchanan - to attack him, and the ziomedia, of course. Buchanan himself later ran for president, and the first time that he did he was sweeping the primaries, and then suddenly in the extremely corrupt state of Arizona (John McCain's headquarters) he abruptly stopped winning just when his momentum was building up. Why? Because they "adjusted" the computerized voting machines, that's why. The next time he ran he deliberately sabotaged his own candidacy by picking one deranged negress after another to be his running mate. A number of years earlier Governor George Wallace was running for president and he was also kicking ass in the primaries, so they shot him down. That's what they do.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
As has been mentioned a number of times before, the SEC (and ACC) stadiums packed in the fall with 75,000 rabid DWFs rooting for pretty much coal black teams is a telling commentary that the South is in no immediate danger of rising again and that Whites in every region of the country have been very effectively homogenized culturally (i.e. deracinated).



I see more white prostitutes hanging on to the arms of bull negroes in the deep south than I do in any other part of the country.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
People in the north have always sat up on a high horse, and patted themselves on the back for being better than us dirty southerners. It seems that has never changed.

THe thing is outside of the major cities in the north there aint really no blacks. THe northerners are blessed enough to live in a world where they arent at EVERY public place you go ALL hours of the day, and night. From Texas all the way to Virginia, and everywhere in between there are black goons everywhere. We are born around them, and we go to school with them. Where we are fed the most intense propaganda ever drummed up.

I dont doubt there are more black male/white female couples in the south. I mean I see them often, but its not some genetic flaw. Its because of the over the top propaganda that has made them feel guilty for being not only white, but southern.

As far as Abe Lincons war of oppression goes, well only a fool, or a brainwashed person would side with the blue bellies on that one. Even just a small amount of study on Abe Lincons war of tyranny proves that the Union was the aggressors, and the morally inferior side. The south just wanted to be left alone, but the Union needed the southern productivity to survive. Abe Lincon wanted big government, and big banks. Congats to ol dishonest Abe.



But Abe Lincoln did want to free the negro slaves -and then send them back to Africa (they deliberately left that part off the inscription on the Lincoln Monument), and he also wanted to try to get an honest usury and banker-free money system, as did JFK, so they shot him down too. Another southerner who presented a threat to the monsters in Washington was Huey Long and they also solved that problem in their usual manner. If an honest politician ever accidentally turns up that's what they do, or lock him, like they did to Jim Trafficant, and David Duke too.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
Speaking of the great CSA, I like this song - "The Irish Brigade"..."Did those cowardly lincolnites tremble when they met with the Irish brigade!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ot7amDyqbY

But there was also an Irish Brigade on the Yankee side.

The terrible fratricidal wars and civil wars and genocides of the 18th, 19th, and - worst of all - 20th centuries, destroyed the best blood of the white race, and the US civil war was part of it, the best and bravest gallantly charging into the minie balls and gatling guns with their flags flying. What's left of the white race you can see today - Joe Biden and the people of walmart, garbage like that.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
A real breakup of the USA would not be pretty. It would make Yugoslavia's breakup look like high tea.

The above post start when I ask myself if the North only wanted to free the slaves why didn't they just ask the South for the blacks as the price of independence, but money was the real reason for the war. Since the war Yankees have used blacks and now other nonwhites as a reason to look down upon and oppress White Southerners, but to many Yankees dismay after they targeted the South, the "elite" moved on to use the same strategy on the North and what could they say after cheering on the "Civil Rights" movement in the South? Divide and conquer. Since they claim that the nonwhite is why they must oppress and keep the South in the Union why not move them up North. At first I was going to suggest sending Arkansas 750 to 800 thousand blacks to Michigan since they were sister states but then remembered Jaxvid came from there and Texas has around 15 million nonwhites.

In reality, there is no way the Yankee would want those "precious" "beautiful" black and other nonwhite peoples, and that is the whole point.

As for what a breakup would look like, mass starvation, cannibalism (just wait for the bleeding hearts to take food to starving blacks only to become food), genocide, ethic cleansing, possible use of nuclear weapons, worst case scenario hundreds of millions dead and if it spreads would wide billions.

Some states may hold at least partly together while other fall completely apart into city states, after the fighting on military forts and bases ends some commanders may help a faction as other seek to become a factions onto themselves. Some factions will fight each other, others ally together to fight others. European country may intervene both for and against the White and Asians will likely invade the West coast to help their people and themselves to land. Don't be surprised if Asians gain the land West of the Rockies.

In this near worst case scenario, blacks aren't likely to remain free if they remain at all for these Whites would be battle harden warriors, the bleeding hearts literally being eaten at the beginning of these scenario, this type of Whites aren't likely to let weakling blacks remain free on their own land especially considering the blacks will, probably, not be able to feed any sizable number, so either they have too few blacks to fight or will raid White areas for food either way they be targeted. Mestizos will fight and hold out longer and it may be many years before their defeat as a real Reconquista drives them out, they may even lose parts of Mexico both to Whites and Asians.

Borderlines in this scenario would form based not on old borderlines but on what a faction can conquer and hold. In time, they likely form into Western European size nations and several of them. Not a pretty scenario to get there.

The USA is an untenable country and will fall apart, but the amount of time could be centuries as various types of dictatorships try to hold it together or it could happen tomorrow, but it will happen and most likely be more horrifying worst than cannibal horror movie. My guess would be that it will happen in this century.

The current "elite" will do nothing to stop it because they would lose their power if they did.

Do not underestimate the small number who created the CSA, in the first place and the USA. Only about 5% is needed if the time is right to recreate the CSA and if the time is right most of the rest will go along. The odds are low that it will recreate itself as of old but nothing is impossible. Don't forget rank and file communist will become National Socialist on a dime if their leaders demand it. Most people are sheep. And there is a real division between the north and the south which can still be seen in voting patterns. Blue states and red states as they said. Even with rigged votes and two wings of one party it still is there.

We must be willing to try and find a way to prevent the massive violence that will follow an uncontrolled breakup. The odds maybe against us but we must try, and we must face unnerving truths if we want to succeed.

The first post in this thread was a joke proposing an unworkable solution in order to get people to think.


Good post.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
703
Abe Lincoln wanted to try to get an honest usury and banker-free money system, as did JFK, so they shot him down too..
This thread has gone from the hypocrisy of Northern attitudes on race, to a run of posts on the South's growing mudfish population,.. to the assassination of Lincoln. I love it.

Regarding the Lincoln killing, "they" were a group of men who were initially attempting to aid the Confederate war cause. Booth & his men, planned to kidnap Lincoln, & hold him as a bargaining chip to secure the release of Confederate POWs. When that plan didn't come to fruition, and Lee surrendered.. Plan B became: kill Lincoln & his cabinet. Booth wanted Lincoln dead, bcuz he understood that Lincoln bore the greatest individual responsibility for first, denying the South's desire to peacefully leave the Union, and secondly the forced emancipation & integration of Blacks. Supposedly Booth expressed anger about Black citizenship in the same breath that he swore he'd kill Lincoln (?)

If u have something on the idea that Booth was motivated by money-system issues, share it with me (I'm a history & CSA buff).. I've never heard it..
as to date, I accept that Booth was angry about the loss of the war, emancipation & the South's dream of secession being over.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
I like conversations that go off on interesting tangents.

Funny how every time someone who really presents a threat to "the lords and masters" comes along a convenient "nut" pops up to kill him, like old Abe Lincoln - there are various theories knocking around about what really happened there - you can google them; JFK - and they handed us this absurd vaudeville gag about how this military feller who mysteriously went to work in the USSR at the height of the cold war and then just quietly came back here again and just happened to get a job on the top floor of the book depository a few days before JFK drove by, and he had this old beat up WW1 bolt action rifle with which he made his miraculous shots, and then a petty thief named Jack Ruby (who was in reality one of the Godfather's - the real godfather - Meyer Lansky's top henchmen, Jack Rubenstein) conveniently whacked him before he could tell his side of the story, Rubenstein conveniently dying in turn...yeah right. Governor George Wallace, Governor Huey Long, Bobby Kennedy, JFK Jr., ...Sometimes the threat to the Lords and Masters is great enough to require a lot more effort, such as with Time magazine's man of the year for 1938. His worst crime from their point of view was opting out of their international banking-usury system and proving how well that works. That really pissed them off.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
Here's Governor Huey Long speaking on the Republican-Democratic party scam, just as applicable now as it was then. Governor George Wallace spoke out on it too. Shortly before they shot him down he said, "democrats and republicans not a dime's worth of difference". They shot them both down.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avGl7k4OGJY
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
This thread has gone from the hypocrisy of Northern attitudes on race, to a run of posts on the South's growing mudfish population,.. to the assassination of Lincoln. I love it.

Regarding the Lincoln killing, "they" were a group of men who were initially attempting to aid the Confederate war cause. Booth & his men, planned to kidnap Lincoln, & hold him as a bargaining chip to secure the release of Confederate POWs. When that plan didn't come to fruition, and Lee surrendered.. Plan B became: kill Lincoln & his cabinet. Booth wanted Lincoln dead, bcuz he understood that Lincoln bore the greatest individual responsibility for first, denying the South's desire to peacefully leave the Union, and secondly the forced emancipation & integration of Blacks. Supposedly Booth expressed anger about Black citizenship in the same breath that he swore he'd kill Lincoln (?)

If u have something on the idea that Booth was motivated by money-system issues, share it with me (I'm a history & CSA buff).. I've never heard it..
as to date, I accept that Booth was angry about the loss of the war, emancipation & the South's dream of secession being over.

You buy that story about John Wilkes Booth killing Lincoln!! He was just a patsy set up by the zionists in the government and international jewry. Lincoln was a hero man!! All he wanted was to help the South avoid becoming part of an international banking scheme guided by jews in Europe. He wasn't invading the South he was 'liberating' it!! Don't believe that phony baloney history your government brainwashed teachers have been telling you. Nothing ever happens because of chance and the strange behavior of deranged people, it's all planned out. Follow the money.
 

FootballDad

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
5,157
Location
Somewhere near Kansas City, MO
You buy that story about John Wilkes Booth killing Lincoln!! He was just a patsy set up by the zionists in the government and international jewry. Lincoln was a hero man!! All he wanted was to help the South avoid becoming part of an international banking scheme guided by jews in Europe. He wasn't invading the South he was 'liberating' it!! Don't believe that phony baloney history your government brainwashed teachers have been telling you. Nothing ever happens because of chance and the strange behavior of deranged people, it's all planned out. Follow the money.
Having fun with all of this, aren't you jax? :evil:
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
Having fun with all of this, aren't you jax? :evil:


They teach them to shut their eyes and ears and scream "conspiracy theory!" and go into the stand up comedy routine when confronted by confusing and politically incorrect material that they never heard about on television and consequently must be suspect.


"So you see, my dear Coningsby, that the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." - Benjamin Disraeli

Disraeli was the (Jewish) prime minister of Great Britain and northern Ireland and he knew the score. He knew that what was really pulling the strings from behind the curtain, what was really going on, had nothing to do with what they told the ordinary walking around slobs was going on.

What do you think our billionaire lords and masters do at their top secret conferences, like the Bilderbergers and the Trilateral Commission and the Council of Foreign Relations (President Barry's husband Michelle was executive director at the Chicago CFR...they don't advertise that), talk about tv shows and spectator sports? Uh, no, they plan stuff, they conspire.

Here's one going on right now. What do you think they're doing there, discussing how fat some dumb assed movie actress looks in her bathing suit like the people of walmart crowd?

Elite Gather on Gated Island for Secret Meeting

As reported by local media, billionaires are gathering on the island of Kiawah, located near South Carolina. The story broke on May 10, but the meeting was reported to have started on the 8th. “Suspicion was raised when nearly 20 very expensive jets were seen lined up at the Charleston International Airport on Johns Island,” reported WBTW.
The meeting is reportedly being led by Bill Gates of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The public has been kept away from the hotel which is hosting the meeting. Other reported attendees include Michael Bloomberg of New York, Oprah Winfrey and Billionaire Warren Buffet. The potential Presidential hopeful Jeb Bush is also reported to be attending...

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/05/elite-gather-on-gated-island-for-secret.html
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
You buy that story about John Wilkes Booth killing Lincoln!! He was just a patsy set up by the zionists in the government and international jewry. Lincoln was a hero man!! All he wanted was to help the South avoid becoming part of an international banking scheme guided by jews in Europe. He wasn't invading the South he was 'liberating' it!! Don't believe that phony baloney history your government brainwashed teachers have been telling you. Nothing ever happens because of chance and the strange behavior of deranged people, it's all planned out. Follow the money.



Jax is just being funny, but I'm not saying that Booth was part of an international conspiracy - I don't know that much about it - though some people do think he was part of a larger conspiracy and they give their reasons for saying so, but it just strikes me odd how so many high profile who do dare to challenge the international bankers wind up getting killed very quickly.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
703
You buy that story about John Wilkes Booth killing Lincoln!! Follow the money.


You forgot the part where they put Jack Ruby & Doc, in a DeLorean, & sent him back in time to Port Royal VA, to finish off Booth..

Honestly, I appreciate hearing new takes & explanations on things. I believe that truth is frequently stranger than fiction.
But the idea that Booth was a disgruntled Southerner angry about Lee's surrender, & fearful of Blacks voting, & was motivated to kill The South's public enemy #1,.. still passes the eyeball test for me. But who knows, I'm willing to listen to other theories..

 
Top