Charley Rosen is an idiot!

SteveB

Mentor
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
1,043
Location
Texas
Last week Rosen wrote a terrible article about Darko and today he comes out and blasts Yao Ming. Yao is not white, but the same criticisms are applied to him as white NBA players. Yao has been dominating since he came back from injury and is the only reason the Rockets are in the playoff hunt. When you read this article keep in mind that Yao scored 36 pts, shot over 50% from the field and was 18 for 20 in free throws in the game that Rosen in analyzing.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/5410592

Yao simply not good enough to carry team

In his three previous NBA seasons, the scouting reports on Yao Ming were a mixed bag.

His huge physical dimensions, soft shots, unselfishness, and point-making skills were undeniably top caliber. On the flip side, Yao's feet were slow, he was incapable of playing more than 30 energetic minutes per game, and he seldom played with noticeable passion. He was deemed an elite center, but not a franchise-type player who could someday lead his team deep into the playoffs.

Then everything changed.

After playing in pain at the start of the current campaign, Yao underwent tootsie surgery and missed 21 games. Since his return, his numbers indicate that Yao has been the most dynamic big man in the NBA. Peja Stojakovic has even called him "unstoppable."

Yao's enhanced scoring, rebounding, and passing have led the Rockets to the cusp of playoff contention. Heading into Monday's homecourt date with the Nets, Houston was a mere three games behind the current 8th seed.

The possibility of a "new" Yao raises a pair of interesting questions: What's the difference between Yao then and Yao now? What kind of immediate (without the injured Tracy McGrady) and long-range (with T-Mac) futures are likely for the Rockets?

Houston's 90-77 loss to New Jersey offered some significant clues.

MIN FG 3FG FT REB A ST BS TO PTS
Yao 38 9-17 0-0 18-20 9 1 0 1 1 36

For sure, with T-Mac unavailable, the Rockets couldn't surround Yao with star-quality players. And after a quick start Houston was never really in the ball game. Still and all, it says here that Yao's 36 points were spectacularly unimpressive.

Offense
His moves were totally robotic: From the right box, Yao went to his turnaround jumper eight times, scoring five buckets and two free throws, and also firing up an airball. He was fouled both times he wheeled into the middle.

From the left box, he slowly spun baseline five times, scoring a single basket and getting a shot blocked. From there, he turned into the middle twice, getting fouled and also getting another shot blocked (by Jason Kidd).

Yao's other hoops came on a layup created by a nifty drop pass from Rafer Alston, by a fortuitous offensive rebound that simply dropped into his lap, and by poor defense on the part of the Nets.

Yao showed a solid base whenever he caught the ball down low. But his balance was noticeably shaky whenever he was on the move. (He was either tripped or knocked to the floor a total of four times ... mainly because he was too upright and his center of gravity is so elevated.) That's precisely why he made fairly accurate passes when he was doubled on the catch, and made risky passes when he was two-timed as soon as he put the ball on the floor.

Whichever way he moved and whatever shot he unleashed, Yao was extraordinarily slow. (Jason Collins easily beat him to a baseline spot in the third quarter when Yao made his habitual turn from the right box.) Nor was there any trickery involved in his offense  no drop-steps, switching hands, no hipper-dipper delights. Just straight-on TAJ's, layups, and flat-footed jump hooks. The big man is profoundly unathletic.

Moreover, Yao was slow in moving his hands to catch any incoming pass that was slightly off the mark. Early in the third quarter, he waited for the pass to come to him instead of reaching out for the ball, thereby allowing Nenad Krstic to make an easy interception. Jeff Van Gundy was extremely upset, calling a time-out ASAP and yelling at Yao for this miscue.

Because Yao was extraordinarily slow off the floor, spring-legged defenders who fronted him usually got a piece of any attempted lob passes. This happened three times. Similarly, his shot releases were performed in slo-mo, allowing alert defenders (and helpers) to likewise challenge more shots than expected.

It's also surprising that Yao rarely used his elbows to either fend off defenders in the low post or to maneuver himself into better position to snatch offensive rebounds. Instead, he tried to bully his opponents with hip power and with sheer mass.

On the plus side of the equation, these days Yao is making more powerful duck-in moves that enable him to receive the ball in the paint. And once he catches the ball with one foot in the lane, Yao will certainly either score or be fouled.

Defense
Here's where his heavy sneakers were a distinct liability. The Nets starting big men are not bountiful scorers  Krstic is basically a mid-range jump shooter, and Collins can't shoot himself in the foot. In the first half, however, when the Rockets were still within reach, the Nets gave the home team a steady diet of high screen/rolls that zeroed in on Yao's utter lack of lateral movement.

Even when Cliff Robinson  a dead-eye long range shooter  was the screener, Yao either played the S/R from a distance, or made a clumsy attempt to show on the far side.

Accordingly, the Nets ran this maneuver ten times and generated fifteen points, plus a foul on Yao. Had the game been close in the second half, Lawrence Frank would definitely have called the same number again.


The Nets' Vince Carter runs past Yao Ming to score against the Rockets. (Bill Baptist/NBAE / Getty Images)

Whereas Robinson was very effective in fronting Yao on the defensive end, the bigger man had no chance of preventing Robinson from plugging several corner jumpers when their roles were reversed. And on two occasions, Yao was lifted by fakes 20-feet from the basket.

And here's another defensive boo-boo: Carter drove the lane, took a step after he was fouled, and threw up a floater. "If it goes!" the nearest ref shouted. Yao had a great angle and could easily have slammed the shot into the stands, but he merely held his ground and became a spectator. Fortunately for the Rockets, Carter's shot went awry and his chance to complete a 3-point play never materialized. But the sequence illustrated Yao's general lack of aggressiveness.

The Nets challenged Yao with post-ups only twice. Krstic was the designated pivot man, and he did beat Yao to the basket but was tooted for a questionable offensive foul. Krstic also tried his luck at turning and facing Yao, but his wide-open 16-footer was off the mark.

Even if he only registered one swat and two alterations against the Nets, Yao's vertical stature and long arms normally enable him to block his share of shots. At the same time, he has to lower his hands before he can lift them to attack the ball  a delay that severely limits his ability to close down the middle on defense. For the very same reason, several Nets players were able to beat Yao to the top of his jump and prevent him from pulling down several rebounds on both ends of the court.

To try and hinder Vince Carter's dynamic post-up scoring, Yao lumbered over to double VC several times. Twice, Yao completely obliterated Carter's court vision and forced wild passes. Once, Yao couldn't recover in time to prevent Krstic from nabbing an offensive rebounds. But on every other sequence, the Rockets were able to rotate and cover for him.

It was also on defense where Yao's lack of stamina was most evident. Toward the end of his rotations, Yao played straight-legged defense. And whenever he took an outside position on the free throw line, he spent virtually all of the dead time leaning forward with his hands on his knees. Both of these acts being tell-tale signs of profound weariness.

What, then, is the sum of Yao's game?

Under certain conditions he is indeed an unstoppable scorer. But smart defensive teams who can field legitimate shot-blockers can cramp Yao's effectiveness. Doubling him on the move can induce him into turnovers. Getting into his legs may cause him to topple. Yao can also be confounded by fronting defenders aided and abetted by quick baseline rotations.

On defense, Yao is virtually helpless when asked to guard bigs who can shoot in S/R situations.

No question that he'll score points by the dozen with T-Mac down. But the Rockets are still destined to be grounded.

With a healthy McGrady on board, Yao can fit into the role that best suits him  being the world's most colossal second banana  and with a few more tweaks in their roster, Houston can be a legitimate playoff team for years to come. As things stand, however, Yao is simply not good enough to carry a team on his own.

When Peja claimed that Yao was "unstoppable," he was most likely describing what would happen if he had to guard the big guy.




Edited by: SteveB
 

SteveB

Mentor
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
1,043
Location
Texas
One thing that you always notice when these guys are criticizing Yao, Dirk, Peja, etc is they say they are a liability on defense. Well let's see, if Yao scores 36 pts and the other teams center scores 7 pts, then it would seem that the other teams center is the defensive liability, not Yao.
 

guest301

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
4,246
Location
Ohio
That's because good defence is hard to quantify for the average fan and it is easier to get away with making stupid comments about someone's defence.
 

JoeV

Guru
Joined
Jun 29, 2005
Messages
432
Location
Ohio
Schoolyard ball mentality (no defensive game) is exactly why the US did not get gold in Australia!
 

guest301

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
4,246
Location
Ohio
Don't forget...not being able to hit a jump shot with any consistency hurt too. Layups and dunks won't get you a gold medal anymore.
 

KG2422

Mentor
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
986
Location
Texas
They didn't get the gold because the other teams were better. They were lucky to get the bronze.
 

psychosid

Newbie
Joined
Apr 23, 2005
Messages
92
Location
United States
guys dont take anything this semetic parisite says seriously, he has an agenda to persure, the destruction of the moral of the white race.
 

White_Savage

Mentor
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Texas
Okay, you notice some of the totally unrelated to reality criticisms this guy feeds us?

"Not "passionate" enough." Meaningless phrase-real translation-does act like a black idiot on court.

"Robotic"-Alsos meaningless. Possible real translation "No known illegitmate children."

"No Energetic"-Never chokes a ref or coach.
 

guest301

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
4,246
Location
Ohio
Check out the latest article by this idiot on the msn sports page today. He is now saying that Redick "may not be able to even cut it in the CBA" and that Morrison" if he works hard may just become a double digit scorer at the next level". Moron! He said a whole lot of stupid things like that but I don't know how to download the link to that article to CF..so check it out if you can stomach it.
 

KG2422

Mentor
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
986
Location
Texas
JD074, where is his criticism of Bryant? All I saw among his articles was a headline saying that Kobe and Billups were the key for Team USA.

Here's his latest:

Your description of J.J. Redick and Adam Morrison as one-dimensional offensive players also describes many players in the NBA currently making millions of dollars. Quentin Richardson, Antoine Walker and Mike Dunleavy come to mind. Redick and Morrison, however, will put fans in seats. Don't you think that the reality of fiduciary concerns might influence some sharp basketball businessmen to find roster spots for these two All-Americans? Even Joe Dumars had his Darko moment. I think it's a lock that both Redick and Morrison make it in the NBA. â€â€￾ Rodney

Your examples aren't quite spot-on. Richardson is incredibly strong and can play defense when he wants to. Walker's ball-handling ability is top-notch. But Dunleavy does make for a good comparison with Morrison. Too bad Dunleavy is an atrocious defender and that even some of his teammates complain about his being too soft. Attaining the level of a Dunleavy is about the best Morrison can do. Sure, Morrison will be a curiosity for a while, but that's it. (Think Andrew Bogut.)

Redick, however, is five inches shorter than Dunleavy, has a much less-evolved handle (if any to speak of), has a slower shot-release, is slower afoot and plays even worse defense. How many fans will pay to see Redick hit an occasional long-ball and then be otherwise abused from tip to buzzer?

You're right, though, that NBA decision-makers are frequently pressured by media hype into drafting inferior players much too high: Stromile Swift, DerMarr Johnson, Jerome Moiso, Courtney Alexander, Mateen Cleaves, Donnell Harvey and Erick Barkley were all first-rounders in 2000. And how about the likes of Felton Spencer, Shawn Bradley, Eric Montross, Carlos Rogers, Khalid Reeves, Yinka Dare, Michael Olowokandi, Trajan Langdon and so on? How many paying customers did that crew attract?

Yes, Morrison is a legit NBAer with a limited future. But if Redick makes the league, it's for all the wrong reasons â€â€￾ one of them possibly being his skin pigmentation. However, you are certainly entitled to your opinion. Different streets for different streets, after all. And that's why so many bookies are rich.
 

Jofreidr_1488

Newbie
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
70
Rosen is either an idiot of insane! The problem with the Rockets is not Ming, it is McGradys back (and it is not McGradys fault he has a bad back BTW, sometimes these things happen and no one is at fault). Also alot of responsibility has to go to the Rockets GM (who is it? hehe) their roster of role players is horrible. For awhile they had another player with a bad back playing point guard: Derek Anderson. DA used to be good like 4 years ago but now at the tail end of his career he needs to be coming off the bench not starting (however they did trade him to the Heat I think) However his replacement isn't that much better: Rafter Alston, this guy has a horrible shooting percentage and he apparently keeps chucking up the rock 14-15 times a game anyway, I know from reading the stats in the newspaper! Remember last year when they tried to get Bob Sura to play Point? This is a guy that is a shooting guard not a point guard and should never have been put in the position at all, this is not Houston Rocket Science!
 
Joined
Apr 22, 2005
Messages
1,057
Why don't you check out Charley's ratings of the greatest players of all-
time, and see the respect he gives white legends of the game before
bashing him.

Charley disses tons of players. So he doesn't like Redick's game? So what?
JJ is a tournament choker and an NBA role player -- he said so himself
(the latter), that he wouldn't be a star in the NBA, so screw him.
 

KG2422

Mentor
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
986
Location
Texas
I've looked at his articles that are online. He saves the majority of his criticism for White athletes. Big deal if he likes Steve Nash and Larry Bird. He probably got on those bandwagons late.
 

White_Savage

Mentor
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Texas
GLS
Praise for one current White athlete better than praise for 10 Whites from old times, always with the implication "They were the greatest before the blacks showed up"

I've noticed its alot more "politically correct" to idolize Dempsey or Marciano than Klitscko or Hatton.
 
Top