whiteCB said:
With the stats he put up in high school and his times on the track there is no way he shouldn't be playing D1 football. This is your classic case of a kid with talent getting screwed over because his skin's the wrong color for the position he plays. If this was the 1970s he would have a full ride playing for some state school. In 2009 though you have to be an all-world record setting player if your white to get a D1 football schlarship.
Damn WhiteCB- this is one of my favorite posts of yours. When I read this last early afternoon- I was about to post basically the exact same argument, but was too busy.
I haven't seen this kid's game film. The only thing I can think of to add to your post, is that maybe somehow after a few scouts watched
Imhoff's film or watched him play- they thought he was "raw".
However, that's hard to argue with statistics like this- 49 rec, 826 yds, 8 TDs (in football crazy Texas)- these are great numbers for a "H.S" WR. In H.S, running the ball is easier than passing it downfield, for the vast majority of teams at that level.
And Imhoff's blazing 10.62 100 meter shows he has the long speed to separate at "any level". What's not to like about this kids "upside". Plenty of blacks, who don't have nearly this kids measurables or production, are called "raw" with "upside".
The truth of the matter is that Rivals and the PROPAGANDA MACHINE recruiting websites did nothing to plug or help this kid out and probably have him unranked. I'm sure a few scouts checked Imhoff out in football crazy Texas, but Rivals, ESPN Scouts INC and Scout want the best white talent to go untapped to protect their lie. Now even NFLdraftscout.com is giving weight to Rivals rankings as seen by their 2013 NFL rankings.