A snip from a JasonCole article in which he tries to -minimize- the significance of QB passer ratings.Why would Colebelittle the rating? From a Q+A segment:
Quarterback ratings a re meaningless
Matt English weighed in on the previous subject, but made a final point of saying that passer rating is the best form of measuring the efficiency of a quarterback. By that measure, Vick was clearly substandard and Vince Young wasn't all that good.
Sorry Matt, and all others who look at passer rating as something of significance, but it's about as important as using ERA to measure the talent of a pitcher, or batting average to measure the talent of a hitter. It only measures one aspect (throwing) and doesn't account for numerous factors, such as sacks and rushing yardage for a quarterback.
Beyond that, passer rating and passing, in general, is usually influenced strongly by the talent around a quarterback.
Edited by: Bart