Here is a copy of the people that are voting to delete the article(paragraph) from wikipedia.
Wikipedia is not a (racist) web directory. CDC (talk) 02:28, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The article is not racist, but rather about a site that at least deals with the issue of "race". I think it could warrant a neutrality dispute page however.[This statement is mine]
* Delete. Wikipedia is not a web directory for every fringe website out there. An article on Race in U.S. sports could be very interesting, though, if done well. According to Google (
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&client=safa ri&rls=en&q=link:fIS3DLeD3QMJ:
www.castefootball.us/), there seem to be about five unique websites linking to this page, and all of them look pretty suspicious (white supremacist tinges). --Fastfission 03:39, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
* Delete: Wikipedia is not a web guide. Let this web site have a good Alexa number, and then talk to us about it. Otherwise, if there is anything more bankrupt and corrosive than the concept of race, it's the concept of caste. Geogre 06:01, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
* Delete. Fringe website. Average Earthman 08:09, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
* Delete (with reservarions) If someone wants to attempt a complete blank and rewrite, it migh pass. Otherwise, no. -Casito 08:44, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
* Delete Tone of article leans to POV. Article entity is also of questionable notability, though further editting and expansion might show why it should remain. However, on balance I say delete. -- Glen Finney 13:25, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Edited by: IceSpeed