BLM leader Yusra Khogali says that white people suffer from “genetic defects”

[Charles Martel]

The co-founder of Black Lives Matter Toronto, Yusra Khogali, says that white people suffer from “recessive genetic defects,” according to a report from the Toronto Sun.

In a private Facebook post from 2015 obtained by the Toronto Sun, Khogali said that “white ppl are recessive genetic defects. this is factual.”

“White ppl need white supremacy as a mechanism to protect their survival as a people because all they can do is produce themselves. black ppl simply through their dominant genes can literally wipe out the white race if we had the power to,” she continued.

Khogali bases her theory on the idea that “white people have a higher concentration of enzyme inhibitors that suppress melanin production.”

She argues that melanin is linked to high levels of fertility, strong bones, and the strength of the nervous system, making black people the “first and strongest of all humans,” whose “genetics are the foundation of all humanity.”

Last April, Khogali posted a tweet asking “Allah” to stop her from killing men and white folks,” which she later deleted.

http://www.breitbart.com/social-jus...r-justin-trudeau-white-supremacist-terrorist/

http://www.torontosun.com/2017/02/1...founder-appears-to-label-white-people-defects

 

[Charles Martel]

http://www.torontosun.com/2017/02/1...founder-appears-to-label-white-people-defects

While these remarks alarmed many Canadians, they pale in comparison to a statement numerous sources forwarded to the Sun that Khogali appears to have posted on Facebook in late 2015.

“Whiteness is not humxness,” the statement begins. “infact, white skin is sub-humxn.” The post goes on to present a genetics-based argument centred on melanin and enzyme.

“White ppl are recessive genetic defects. this is factual,” the post reads towards the end. “white ppl need white supremacy as a mechanism to protect their survival as a people because all they can do is produce themselves. black ppl simply through their dominant genes can literally wipe out the white race if we had the power to.”

 

[DixieDestroyer]

That's beyond laughable. This is sheer baseless blather coming from a "representative" of the most inferior race in the history of mankind (bar none).

 

[whiteathlete33]

That's beyond laughable. This is sheer baseless blather coming from a "representative" of the most inferior race in the history of mankind (bar none).

And the truth is they know it deep down insides but will never admit it.

 

[Ambrose]

It is true, we are defective from nature. If it is that an effective, natural, man has the intelligence little better than the beasts of the earth, the white man is not a natural man; for the white man's mind is so immense, it cannot be the consequence of a natural event.

 

[Deus Vult]

White people are indeed defective. Too many among us are afflicted with toxic levels of deracinated altruism.
This defect is the primary reason the BLM whiners are even alive. Rational white men are outnumbered by our emotionally inferior brethren. Their pathological altruism, uncoupled from the willingness to acknowledge racial differences, leads them to finance missionary trips into the lands of blacks and browns, whose birthrates exceed ours. Their defect leads to white adults adopting nonwhite children - on occasion flying them in like exotic pets. Teaching them our language(s). Placing them in our schools, and finding fault with US when their nonwhite pets don't satisfy our academic or behavioral norms.
Sick-ass white folks!

 

[Charles Martel]

White people are indeed defective. Too many among us are afflicted with toxic levels of deracinated altruism.
This defect is the primary reason the BLM whiners are even alive. Rational white men are outnumbered by our emotionally inferior brethren. Their pathological altruism, uncoupled from the willingness to acknowledge racial differences, leads them to finance missionary trips into the lands of blacks and browns, whose birthrates exceed ours. Their defect leads to white adults adopting nonwhite children - on occasion flying them in like exotic pets. Teaching them our language(s). Placing them in our schools, and finding fault with US when their nonwhite pets don't satisfy our academic or behavioral norms.

That's a defect in many of us, true.

But are the libtards the majority of us, though? I think they comprise about a third or so.

 

[whiteathlete33]

That's a defect in many of us, true.

But are the libtards the majority of us, though? I think they comprise about a third or so.

I can't be sure but when I see white people marching with BLM or any of these other black organizations I get sick to my stomach. Please explain what they do for us other than destroy our cities and our heritage. Or these white idiots walking around with signs saying "We are all Muslims." I would dare these idiots to move into a Middle Eastern country and see if any Muslim would help them promote their religion in their third world cesspools.

 

[Deus Vult]

But are the libtards the majority of us, though? I think they comprise about a third or so.

In my estimation, real libtard opinion-makers and opinion-enforcers comprise less than 20% of the population (Americans). Another perhaps 30%-40% (depending upon where you draw the line) gullibly accept and follow. Another 25% or more
to some degree consider themselves "conservative," but for reasons other than rational thought or weighing of evidence lose their minds when the subject is race. Race is a subject about which the vast majority of white westerners cannot participate in a big-boy conversation. They are deceived regarding facts and manipulated as to emotion.
All of our major institutions, in degrees varying from radical-egalitarian to conservative-integrationist, push liberal blather about race. We sure don't get an honest white race perspective from Fox News, Human Events, National Review, the Claremont Institute or Hillsdale College. No major Republicans defend the race-based Americanism of the Founders. Jefferson , they say, was inconsistent or hypocritical.
Even some scholars who are genuinely rather honest and courageous flinch when it comes to race. Thomas DiLorenzo writes boldly in his books on Abraham Lincoln. DiLorenzo invests far too much ink bashing Lincoln over the perhaps the only things Lincoln was ever correct about: his observations on the natural differences between whites and blacks and his strong opposition to racial integration.
When I commented on the misguided altruism of too many white people, I was thinking specifically not of SJWs or Reginald Denny types, but of Fox News-imbibing, Republican-leaning cucks who raise money to send to nonwhites, who themselves travel as missionaries to nonwhite Third World countries with loads of goodies, who lobby to resettle scores of nonwhites all over North America. Typically good guys. Good neighbors and colleagues. Solid upstanding christian folk who nonetheless contribute to the destruction of our civilization and our kind.

 

[PHillisFan]

That's beyond laughable. This is sheer baseless blather coming from a "representative" of the most inferior race in the history of mankind (bar none).

They have hijacked and taken credit for every culture as their own. In their worldly arrogant perspective they shun logic and reason. They would have been known as the historical "oppressors" and colonizers if their claims were true. Also, in terms of nature, nature must really hate them since their melanin makes it difficult to absorb Vitamin D from the sun.

 

[whiteathlete33]

In my estimation, real libtard opinion-makers and opinion-enforcers comprise less than 20% of the population (Americans). Another perhaps 30%-40% (depending upon where you draw the line) gullibly accept and follow. Another 25% or more
to some degree consider themselves "conservative," but for reasons other than rational thought or weighing of evidence lose their minds when the subject is race. Race is a subject about which the vast majority of white westerners cannot participate in a big-boy conversation. They are deceived regarding facts and manipulated as to emotion.
All of our major institutions, in degrees varying from radical-egalitarian to conservative-integrationist, push liberal blather about race. We sure don't get an honest white race perspective from Fox News, Human Events, National Review, the Claremont Institute or Hillsdale College. No major Republicans defend the race-based Americanism of the Founders. Jefferson , they say, was inconsistent or hypocritical.
Even some scholars who are genuinely rather honest and courageous flinch when it comes to race. Thomas DiLorenzo writes boldly in his books on Abraham Lincoln. DiLorenzo invests far too much ink bashing Lincoln over the perhaps the only things Lincoln was ever correct about: his observations on the natural differences between whites and blacks and his strong opposition to racial integration.
When I commented on the misguided altruism of too many white people, I was thinking specifically not of SJWs or Reginald Denny types, but of Fox News-imbibing, Republican-leaning cucks who raise money to send to nonwhites, who themselves travel as missionaries to nonwhite Third World countries with loads of goodies, who lobby to resettle scores of nonwhites all over North America. Typically good guys. Good neighbors and colleagues. Solid upstanding christian folk who nonetheless contribute to the destruction of our civilization and our kind.

The problem here is can we find 20-30 percent of the black or Muslim or Hispanic population that would fight for a white cause. It would never happen. We allow ourselves to be brainwashed to a level that no other race does. At least blacks are fiercely loyal to their race. I will give them credit for that.

 

[Charles Martel]

Huffington Post writer horrified to learn she's 32% White

https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2017/02/huffpost-writer-white/

 

[Shadowlight]

Interesting that the woman in above post was 'shocked" to discover she is 30% white. There are these things called mirrors so to break down her racial make up I have it at 66% black, 30% white 4% miscellaneous and add in 50% stupid.

 

[DixieDestroyer]

Interesting that the woman in above post was 'shocked" to discover she is 30% white. There are these things called mirrors so to break down her racial make up I have it at 66% black, 30% white 4% miscellaneous and add in 50% stupid.

She can attribute the 50% stupidity to the 66% you mentioned above. ;-)