I've always loved the Cobb vs Ruth debates. I admit I am a bigger Cobb fan than a Ruth fan. But they were so different in their styles that it might just be impossible for me to say Cobb was indeed better than Ruth.
When someone pointed out to Ruth that Cobb batted over .400, Ruth said" Hell, I could hit .600, but they pay me to hit those home runs."
When Cobb was asked if he was a better baseball player than Ruth, he said, "Yes, I do think I was a better ballplayer than Ruth. The record book bears that out. It says I was a better baseball player. I will go along with that."
I honestly think a lot of Cobb's incredible greatness has been overlooked. From 1910 to 1919, a ten year period, Cobb batted .390! When he left the game he held 90 records. If you go to the Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, check out the records room. On the walls are lists of the all-time leaders in many different categories. Cobb's name appears at or near the top in almost every category. Even slugging %. It is amazing to see how well rounded Cobb's game was.
But what I find most appealing about Cobb was how he used his mind. Players and managers today still study his approach to the game.
For example, Cobb may be the only player in history to study
Physiognomy and use it to his advantage.
No player, past or present, could find your weaknesses and use them against you as quickly as Cobb. Players from that era tell stories about the fear he could put into whole defenses.
Of course, Ruth's majestic, towering home runs and World Series pitching records probably trump most of what Cobb did in the majority of people's minds. And if greatness is judged by the people watching, than Ruth better fit the definition of greatness than Cobb.