Ashworth vs. Ward-disgusting display

White_Savage

Mentor
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Texas
Great. So it's just coincidence that the boxing matches that tend to be widely shown just-so-happen to coincide with the REST of t.v's anti-white agitprop-if you own a telivision and claim to be unaware of the latter, then you're lying, even you couldn't miss something so obvious.
 
G

Guest

Guest
White_Savage said:
Great. So it's just coincidence that the boxing matches that tend to be widely shown just-so-happen to coincide with the REST of t.v's anti-white agitprop-if you own a telivision and claim to be unaware of the latter, then you're lying, even you couldn't miss something so obvious.


Up and coming superstars fight bums who get plastered in their first 20 fightsdoes'nt matter ifthey are black or white . THAT IS THE BUSINESS OF BOXING . The reason the Ashford fight was shown on TV was to showcase Wards skills so that the public gets a good look at him . Ward is being groomed to be a future superstar. There was no ''hidden'' agenda to humiliate white men in that fight. It was upcoming Prodigy vs Bum pure and simple.


Are you telling me that every time a black fighter beats a white fighter its the ''system'' pulling strings ?
smiley36.gif
.
 

White_Savage

Mentor
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Texas
Pugnuts opined:

"Are you telling me that every time a black fighter beats a white fighter its the ''system'' pulling strings ?"

Are YOU capable of even one post in which you do not attempt to erect a crude and irrelevant straw man arguement to knock over?

Who wins and who loses is not the issue in this case, though boxing is certainly biased against whites, what with the fact you have to put up with TNB to train in most gyms and the fact that a white almost can't win a descision againt a negroidal. No, the issue here is how certain images of boxing shown widely on the mass media-just like what is shown in many fictional telivision programs, comedies, social documentaries, etc, are all used to mock and demean the white race. Now you might say, well this is just some people making a joke, expressing yourself, but the whole thing is too well coordinated to be the coincidental of individual choices. And the straight white male is the ONLY acceptable target for these barbs. Come on man, no one even tries to deny this trend, even though some seek to JUSTIFY it.

You must think none of us here own a television. I've seen "Chappelle Show" my friend, seen Chris Rock's comedy, seen some of VH1's supposed "documentaries" on racial issues, as well as the standard fare of most sit-coms, etc. You can't fool me, and to deny that anti-white is the official party line is something I don't think even you can do with a straight face.
 
G

Guest

Guest
White_Savage said:
Pugnuts opined:

"Are you telling me that every time a black fighter beats a white fighter its the ''system'' pulling strings ?"

Are YOU capable of even one post in which you do not attempt to erect a crude and irrelevant straw man arguement to knock over?

Who wins and who loses is not the issue in this case, though boxing is certainly biased against whites, what with the fact you have to put up with TNB to train in most gyms and the fact that a white almost can't win a descision againt a negroidal. No, the issue here is how certain images of boxing shown widely on the mass media-just like what is shown in many fictional telivision programs, comedies, social documentaries, etc, are all used to mock and demean the white race. Now you might say, well this is just some people making a joke, expressing yourself, but the whole thing is too well coordinated to be the coincidental of individual choices. And the straight white male is the ONLY acceptable target for these barbs. Come on man, no one even tries to deny this trend, even though some seek to JUSTIFY it.

You must think none of us here own a television. I've seen "Chappelle Show" my friend, seen Chris Rock's comedy, seen some of VH1's supposed "documentaries" on racial issues, as well as the standard fare of most sit-coms, etc. You can't fool me, and to deny that anti-white is the official party line is something I don't think even you can do with a straight face.
O pleazze boxing is a money business Promoters ect dont sit around and say lets dig up some white guy to put on tv to humilitate for our chosen masters. Its about whichboxer has the most potential to sell wether he be white or black. There are more blacks in bpxing gyms then whites its simple demographics and location of gyms.


It seems to me that every program or show that does'nt meet your racial criteria must be a secret attack on the white man. Its a big world out there and people have different opinions and everybody has the right to his opinions. Just because you dont agree with the mainstream culture does''nt mean there is an agenda to destroy White manhood . And most people know that the Chappelle show (which i personally have found to have grown repetitive) and Chris Rock's show are COMEDY not real life.


Unless somebody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to watch then dont watch it .
 

White_Savage

Mentor
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Texas
So when you have a venue that depicts practically every straight white male as somehow boorish and an effimanate wimp at the same time, inept at everything, while simultaneosly depicting most black characters as intelligent, courageous, and stoic, a direct inversion of reality, that's not an attack against whites? Come on, as I say, even black people talk about why it's "okay" to lampoon whites but not vis-versa. The fact that they seek to justify the practice means it does exist.
 
G

Guest

Guest
White_Savage said:
So when you have a venue that depicts practically every straight white male as somehow boorish and an effimanate wimp at the same time, inept at everything, while simultaneosly depicting most black characters as intelligent, courageous, and stoic, a direct inversion of reality, that's not an attack against whites? Come on, as I say, even black people talk about why it's "okay" to lampoon whites but not vis-versa. The fact that they seek to justify the practice means it does exist.
To an extent i agree with you i disagree though that there is some secret conspiracy to demean white straight males . I think the problem lies with over political correctness and society getting to effeminate.
 

White_Savage

Mentor
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Texas
You believe there is no conspiracy? (I never said it was "secret", it is in fact, amazingly blatant) Despite the conspirators sometimes rather sloppily spilling the beans, such as the famous quote from the Jewish Communist Israel Cohen about replacing whites in sports and entertainment as one tactice to destroy the white social fabric of America?

Considering this EXACTLY whats come to pass, we must conclude that either Mr. Cohen was a Nostradamus, or that he and his fellows have been successfully implimenting their plan.

Perhaps in light of this, it is a touch unfair of us to blame blacks so much, who are mere participants and not instigators, and to dwell on their unnatractive qualitiesw so much, as opposed to dwelling on those whose higher intelligence makes their machinations truly dangerous.
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
Fifty years ago, blacks and liberals lamented the fact that there were no black role models on television. Black characters were buffoons and clowns, yassa-massa negroes who played the comedic foil to serious white actors. This lack of role models was detrimental to black self-esteem and made them feel inadequate compared to the white man. So steps were taken to write roles for positive black characters, the negative roles were reduced or eliminated altogether, and, as they say, the rest is history.

So when the same thing happens to white people, i.e. no positive role models, the white characters are either portrayed as villians or effiminate weaklings, its not expected to have the same effect on white people as the same had an effect on earlier generations of blacks?
 

JD074

Master
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
2,301
Location
Kentucky
Yeah Ashworth is a bum, but didn't Ward get shook up a little bit in his first fight against a white fighter (or maybe light-skinned Hispanic, I only saw brief highlights)? No wonder they had him fight Ashworth, and on that pitiful show, Best Damn Sports Show Period, no less.

As for the media being anti-white, it doesn't have to be one single, grand "conspiracy" to be true. Same thing with sports being anti-white. Or politics. Or universites. Or education. Or business. We've been so thoroughly brain-washed by anti-white propaganda at least since the 60's (even before then) that a single conspiracy is probably not even necessary at this point. We all believe that whites- especially white men- are evil, wrong, deficient, uncool, pathological, etc. Marxism, Boasian anthropology, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt School, non-white mass immigration, New York Intellectuals, the 60's Counterculture... all are essentially anti-white movements. The anti-white agenda has already been accomplished.
 

White_Savage

Mentor
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Texas
" Marxism, Boasian anthropology, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt School, non-white mass immigration, New York Intellectuals, the 60's Counterculture..."

Gee JD, wonder what all those things have in common...

It's bizarre to me that anyone thinks the race on Earth with the highest average levels of intelligence, cunning, secrecy, and group loyalty, whose Holy books drip with hatred of the "other", COULDN'T pull off a campaing using the most effective weapons they have-intellectual influence and propaganda. And God knows, we have over the centuries given the Jews real grievances to complain about, although I believe their main idea is and has always been to eliminate their only real rivals in I.Q. and societal organization.
 
G

Guest

Guest
JD074 said:
Yeah Ashworth is a bum, but didn't Ward get shook up a little bit in his first fight against a white fighter (or maybe light-skinned Hispanic, I only saw brief highlights)? No wonder they had him fight Ashworth, and on that pitiful show, Best Damn Sports Show Period, no less.

As for the media being anti-white, it doesn't have to be one single, grand "conspiracy" to be true. Same thing with sports being anti-white. Or politics. Or universites. Or education. Or business. We've been so thoroughly brain-washed by anti-white propaganda at least since the 60's (even before then) that a single conspiracy is probably not even necessary at this point. We all believe that whites- especially white men- are evil, wrong, deficient, uncool, pathological, etc. Marxism, Boasian anthropology, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt School, non-white mass immigration, New York Intellectuals, the 60's Counterculture... all are essentially anti-white movements. The anti-white agenda has already been accomplished.
You mean Wards fight against Kenny Kost who was 8-0 at the time Ward got shook up by a counter from Kost but overall dominated the fight.
 
Top