Zeus
Guru
I had a very long conversation with some fellow patriotic pro white brothers today and I also notice many guys think like that in this site too.
We pretty much dominate every RAW athletic event there is, such as triathlon, gymnastics, decathlon, cycling, rowing etc (too many to name) but our guys will cry and complain how we don't dominate 100 or 200m, which in reality are only two of the very few raw athletic events we don't dominate. We have dominated golf or female tennis for ever, but some white guys will complain for the one-two good players black "race" has produced, when there are x500 more white greats.
Jews and blacks invented one day the term "sub 10 seconds barrier" for the 100m.............Has any of you ever made a research to see how all this 10 sec barrier started? Mainly from pro white men (yes, it was not self loathing liberals) who one day woke up and realized that there's has not been a single white man who has gone sub 10 sec and kept crying and crying and crying about it, to the point Jews and blacks took advantage of it and gave birth to the whole term.
There are tons of "barriers", for example over 6m in pole vault, over 18m in triple jump, over 100m in javelin, many of "barriers" in cycling, swimming, rowing, gymnastics, ice skating etc that our white people own exclusively..........but no one bothers to invent such terms, why my question is? That's our stupidity and we take these sports for granted.........let a Negro break a record in pole vault and I bet you all that the next day there will be a new "barrier" in that sport too!
When you dominate pretty much everything, but you will complain for the few things you don't dominate (for whatever reason) YOU give them the right to take advantage of it and then the story is endless.
If Jesse Owens ( btw, blacks did not even win 2-3% of the medals in those Olympics, but thanks to Hitler's reaction over a SINGLE athletic event, Jews used it against us) won the event of rowing or gymnastics or even table tennis instead of 100m, the media and Jewish propaganda would focus on whatever the black man "took" from Hitler and the White man, it just happened being 100m.
Do you guys realize that if it was gymnastics or swimming or even walking races that blacks dominated, instead of these few running events they do for a few decades now, it would be those sports that the media would focus on and nobody would give a damn for the "fastest" man on earth?
Wasn't golf a boring, nonathletic, no good blah blah sport for 150 years, but the day a Negro started being a dominant figure in it, he became the richest, the "baddest", the athlete of the athletes and so on? If we did not focus so much on what our people don't dominate (very few indeed) but focused on all WE DOMINATE, then they would not have so much power against us. Just my opinion.
A great example to close this, is Heavyweight Boxing, when it was dominated from Negroes it used to be the "Godliest" title on earth, for the last 15 years it means nothing........really? Isn't WWE a staged "fake" sport etc? I remember when the Rock was the man, WWE became the baddest sport in America.
Guys, maybe we should all approach things a little differently? When the day comes and 100m will be dominated by a white man again, they will find a way to discredit the whole sport like they do with HW boxing now.
We pretty much dominate every RAW athletic event there is, such as triathlon, gymnastics, decathlon, cycling, rowing etc (too many to name) but our guys will cry and complain how we don't dominate 100 or 200m, which in reality are only two of the very few raw athletic events we don't dominate. We have dominated golf or female tennis for ever, but some white guys will complain for the one-two good players black "race" has produced, when there are x500 more white greats.
Jews and blacks invented one day the term "sub 10 seconds barrier" for the 100m.............Has any of you ever made a research to see how all this 10 sec barrier started? Mainly from pro white men (yes, it was not self loathing liberals) who one day woke up and realized that there's has not been a single white man who has gone sub 10 sec and kept crying and crying and crying about it, to the point Jews and blacks took advantage of it and gave birth to the whole term.
There are tons of "barriers", for example over 6m in pole vault, over 18m in triple jump, over 100m in javelin, many of "barriers" in cycling, swimming, rowing, gymnastics, ice skating etc that our white people own exclusively..........but no one bothers to invent such terms, why my question is? That's our stupidity and we take these sports for granted.........let a Negro break a record in pole vault and I bet you all that the next day there will be a new "barrier" in that sport too!
When you dominate pretty much everything, but you will complain for the few things you don't dominate (for whatever reason) YOU give them the right to take advantage of it and then the story is endless.
If Jesse Owens ( btw, blacks did not even win 2-3% of the medals in those Olympics, but thanks to Hitler's reaction over a SINGLE athletic event, Jews used it against us) won the event of rowing or gymnastics or even table tennis instead of 100m, the media and Jewish propaganda would focus on whatever the black man "took" from Hitler and the White man, it just happened being 100m.
Do you guys realize that if it was gymnastics or swimming or even walking races that blacks dominated, instead of these few running events they do for a few decades now, it would be those sports that the media would focus on and nobody would give a damn for the "fastest" man on earth?
Wasn't golf a boring, nonathletic, no good blah blah sport for 150 years, but the day a Negro started being a dominant figure in it, he became the richest, the "baddest", the athlete of the athletes and so on? If we did not focus so much on what our people don't dominate (very few indeed) but focused on all WE DOMINATE, then they would not have so much power against us. Just my opinion.
A great example to close this, is Heavyweight Boxing, when it was dominated from Negroes it used to be the "Godliest" title on earth, for the last 15 years it means nothing........really? Isn't WWE a staged "fake" sport etc? I remember when the Rock was the man, WWE became the baddest sport in America.
Guys, maybe we should all approach things a little differently? When the day comes and 100m will be dominated by a white man again, they will find a way to discredit the whole sport like they do with HW boxing now.
Last edited:
