NYU said:
And it looks like the success of the teenage international teams will keep things dark for years to come. They're so thoroughly crushing every other country, every single game, that the Dream Team organizers will probably follow the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mantra.
this is so ludicrous, i find it hard to take seriously.
i know that you can't seriously believe that, can you? because after perusing your post, i know that youmust bewell aware of the numerous defeats by all-black USA national teams. otherwise, you couldn't have so carefully selected the dates and teams that you shared with us to "prove" your case of the "invincible" all-black squads.
for example, you attempt tomislead readersby posting your teenage USA teams as somehow incredible world-beaters, when theyrarely play any of the best teams in the world. and then when they do, they often end up on the short end of the scoreboard. i shall begin destroying your carefully contrived false image of utter dominance now.
the USA is the nation that invented the game of basketball, so it comes as no surprise that they are one of the dominant teams in international play. for years, American teams (even all-White ones back in the day) were the usual favorites when it came to international hoops. the highlight of that came when an integrated USA team showed the worldthe pinnacleof basketball achievement: the original Dream Team of the '92 Olympics. it also exposed the game to a world audience that, up 'til then, had rarely given basketball a thought. since that time, however, the USA has seen its assumed role as gold medalist of every international tournament routinely challenged.
while still always considered one of the favorites in any given world tourney, the USA is no longer on a level by itself. you are denying the truth (and intentionally trying to create a false reality) if youmanufacture a propagandicargument that says anything different.
the u-16age groupyou mentioned has only played one international tournament. ever. and it was merely an americas-only tournament, which featured only one other legitimate team: Argentina. hardly proof of your point.
the u-17 team won thefirst-ever World Championship this year at that age group. and they did so in dominant fashion, as you stated.
the u-18 team you mentioned played an americas-only tournament, and barely escaped Brazil (81-78). that's hardly dominating. furthermore, this team never plays outside of an americas-only venue. and while they are the favorite each year (as Argentina isthe only otherlegitimate team at the senior level of international play), all-White Argentina won the gold in 2008 and Puerto Rico won gold in 2002, sandwiching the USA win in 2006. again, hardly a throttle on the world's neck.
the u-19 team you mentioned won the World Championship at that age group in 2009, but hardly in dominating fashion. after emerging froma highly favorabledraw in pool play, they managed to hold on against Serbia, winning by 7. in the semifinals, they escaped a (more?) talented Croatia team, winning only by just 4. they hardly looked dominant in the final, beating Greece by 8.
more importantly, this team is the only one you listedthat had a White player (the roster, in fact, held two). hejust happened to be the team's best player.
i'm sure it escaped your notice (and your "non-black = no talent" theory) that the best player on this team was Gordon Hayward, the White small forwardwho played for Butler University.
oh, by the way, before the nearly all-black USA won the 2009 u-19 World Championships (and before the tourney began to be held every two years; it was formerly held every 4 years), all-White Serbia won it in 2007, all-White Australia won in 2003, all-White Spain won in in 1999, and all-White Greece won way back in 1995. "weird," huh?
the u-21 World Championship tournament that you didn't mention is also telling. of the four times it was held, the now-defunct tournament was won by black USA teams twice... it was also won by all-White teams twice: Australia and Lithuania. again, very "weird."
you completely failed to mention the World University Championships. i'm sure it was an accidental oversight on your part.
"coincidentally," the USA has only managed to win once since 1999, taking the gold in 2005. all-White Yugoslavia won in 2001, all-White Serbia and Montenegro won in 2003, all-White Lithuania won in 2007, and all-White Serbia won in 2009.furthermore, the USA has only managed to place as high as 3rd (which they did twice) over that time period."weird," that you didn't mention this tournament at all ...
the men's USA national team hasn't even qualified for the championship game in the FIBA World Championships since 1994. since then, the World Championship has been one twice by all-White Yugoslavia (1998, 2002) and once by all-White Spain (2006). the silver medalists in all of those tournaments also featured all-White rosters (as did the competitors in the bronze medal game sans the USA). we'll see what happens this year.
in the Olympics, the USA has been far more dominant. other than Argentina's goldmedal win in 2004, the USA haswon every gold medal since 1992, albeit their winning margin has shrunken considerably. consider this, the Dream Team won the championship game by 32. in 2000, that margin had slimmed to a mere 10 points. in 2008, it was 11.
oh, by the way ... the USA is the only team in the world (except a one-year run for France) that features a majority (or for that matter more than one player) black roster that ever challenges for a medal in international competition. if your theory of black supremacy was legitimate, why are there exactly ZERO good national teams from the African continent?
i doubt you'll respond to this post, because you'll definitelyneed toeat some crow ... of course, you apparently like the taste of dark meat. so maybe it won't be hardfor you to choke it down.
Edited by: Jimmy Chitwood