2026 FIFA World Cup

Trump Asked FIFA to Review U.S. Player’s Suspension. Now He’s Eligible to Play.​

The reversal of Folarin Balogun’s World Cup suspension is highly unusual. It was the first time since 1962 that FIFA has nullified a suspension for a red card received during the World Cup.


So idiot-boy Trump got the savage's suspension reversed.

Here's the stomp; not a "lie" as a moon-gazer suggested:

 
Norway’s goalie Nyland with an amazing game! Saved the initial penalty and then a series of incredible saves before Haaland came in to finish the job. This African Brazilian team is a shadow of its former self, they have never quite recovered from the 7-1 drubbing by Germany in 2014 which ironically is when Germany peaked as well.

Heavily rooting for Mexico to beat England and send another black team packing. We could end up with a very watchable quarterfinals coming up. But Argentina needs to forget about their Cape Verde match and take Egypt seriously and prove that stinker was a one-off. From what I saw yesterday, the team with the right matchups and strategy can beat France. They’re not the unbeatable favorites they are made out to be.
 
Ambrose said:
"France" was given a win yesterday. France's most famous homosexual, Mbappe, was not given a handball call against him (the entire world saw it was blatant), but a regular swan dive inside the Paraguayan box for a penalty kick which that homo took and scored. FIFA deciding matches here as usual with the Masonic FIFA. "France" is being favored for some dark reason I can't quite figure out ...

"American" savage Balugan stomped a Bosnian player and got a red card for it in the US-Bosnian match. FIFA suspended the one game suspension for the savage and he will be allowed to play against Belgium. Balugan is being favored for some dark reason I can't quite figure out ...
Click to expand...
France was given a win yesterday ? Well,one can say samething about Argentina whose win was courtesy of Cape Verdi defender's own goal.
 
Let's try to remember that we're White men here and conduct ourselves accordingly. I'm not interested in reading about "savages" and "naggers" and other gratuitous slurs. When I ban a word some posters have taken that as their cue to see how many clever ways they can get around it. It's not appreciated. Keep it productive, respect the site and the few ground rules we have here.
 
England started the game with 4 black defenders and they are some of the worst I’ve seen at this level. One of the “Englishmen” named “Jarell Quansah” was red carded. England very lucky to be surviving 3-2 in the waning minutes. Mexico has had many chances but Pickford has been up to the task.
 
The Peudispuestos of Inglaterra licked the boots of their Masonic rulers and weaseled out a mud-slime-grease-mixed-deviant-baneful-wicked win.

Los mexicanos hicieron de todo menos ganar ...!
 
Freethinker said:
England started the game with 4 black defenders and they are some of the worst I’ve seen at this level. One of the “Englishmen” named “Jarell Quansah” was red carded. England very lucky to be surviving 3-2 in the waning minutes. Mexico has had many chances but Pickford has been up to the task.
Click to expand...
You're right, Pickford's steady performance kept England safe. Besides the one African defender getting red carded, two other Afro-English defenders got yellow cards.

Harry Kane with a penalty kick goal and an assist.

The Mexican team had 11 actual Mexicans starting. "England" started 5 Englishmen and 6 Africans. It's entirely reasonable to want an English team of 11 Englishmen. If Norway can upset "England" in the quarterfinals it'll be epic.
 
Own goals have always been part of soccer. Statistically, about 3% of goals are own goals. If an own goal is the one goal that assures a win, that's how it is. It's happened before and it'll happen again. Therefore, singling out Argentina's win as "illegitimate" because Cape Verde scored an own goal is not a logical argument. Rather, it indicates a bias against Argentina on the arguer's part.
 
Don Wassall said:
Let's try to remember that we're White men here and conduct ourselves accordingly. I'm not interested in reading about "savages" and "naggers" and other gratuitous slurs. When I ban a word some posters have taken that as their cue to see how many clever ways they can get around it. It's not appreciated. Keep it productive, respect the site and the few ground rules we have here.
Click to expand...
All the petty slurs and insults don't get a white athlete a medal or put him on the podium, as far as I know the stop watch is color blind.I can support white athletes without exhibiting petty insecurities.
 
Don Wassall said:
Let's try to remember that we're White men here and conduct ourselves accordingly. I'm not interested in reading about "savages" and "naggers" and other gratuitous slurs. When I ban a word some posters have taken that as their cue to see how many clever ways they can get around it. It's not appreciated. Keep it productive, respect the site and the few ground rules we have here.
Click to expand...

Those are two pretty good words; fine bits of lexical spice. Keir Starmer, Lindsey Graham, Justin Trudeau, and let's not forget the great Benjamin Mileikowsky are good examples of savages. Anyone can use their imagination to apply the word to others that behave alike. Color has nothing to do with it. As for naggers (persistently contrary), there's a new fella here that is auditioning as one he he he.
 
One of England's top test tube freaks went on a savage tear in the first half. I'm sure the Mexican players sustained some niggling injuries with those English defenders nagging them all evening. I'm glad the ref didn't renege on that red card. England did not need a boon in the end, as Harry Kane can score carte blanche.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
American Freedom News
Back
Top