2013 NFL Season Week One

dwid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
4,254
Location
Louisiana
While Gerhart, Hillis & Leonard waste away...are we supposed to believe guys put up pedestrian numbers like Bilal Powell(WHO?) 12 carries for 29(LESS THAN 2.5 AVG)...Green-Ellis 14-25...Ingram 9-11...Lamar Miller only 10 for 3.....Are more capable??? What a load of crap!

Doug Martin only had 20-41...before finally busting a 17 yard run on his 21st carry...Give the ball to Gerhart 20 carries and he is bound to break a few!

Props to Hartline, Edelman, & Amendola & TE Cameron

TOP QB's so far... Manning-462, Flacco-362 Brees-357, Stafford-357,

Wilson 320, Ryan-304, Weeden 289, Brady 288, Dalton 282..Tannehill-272(good job!)...NOT LISTED in TOP TEN by FOX?? WHY? The list Geno Smith 10th at 256 instead?? Move along...nothing to see here..i 'll check back to see if they changed it
And Reggie bush is no longer Reggie Bust because he got 6 years to reach his upside. Imagine a 2nd overall pick that is a White back not getting 1k until his 6th yr. he finally is showing of his home run speed in his 8th season w a career long of 77. I suspect Mark Ingram is going is going to get the same courtesy, like Reggie will not avg 4 or more ypc his first 4 years. No mention of Jordy just having a knee operation
 

BeyondFedUp

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
4,468
Location
United States
Well games over. Apparently when Clay got that roughing penalty it was supposed to be 4th down! Instead San Fran gets another crack on 3rd down and they scored. Smells fishy to me.

This season has barely started and it already smells VERY fishy. The calls, the non-calls, the promos, the all-black hype, it's truly pathetic. At least the Pats won...other than that...things are lookin bad so far in many ways.
 

bigunreal

Mentor
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
1,923
Okay, I admit that I am primarily focusing on this black quarterback thing. I just can't get past it. Today, we saw 3 new starting black quarterbacks. Each one of them put up much better than expected stats. It doesn't matter how misleading the stats may be- it is undeniable that they are all pretty much putting up good stats each week now.

Compare what EVERY black quarterback is doing now to the continuing struggles of all the young white QBs outside of Luck and Stafford. I said last week that if Smiff and Pryor, especially, didn't have a putrid game this week, then I would not accept it as legitimate. I stand by that statement. When are we going to see a Blaine Gabbart-Jimmy Clausen- Christian Ponder type of very low completion percentage, low yardage, high turnover game from ANY of these magical black quarterbacks?

Look at what happened today. Russell Wilson completed over 75% of his passes. No interceptions (did have a fumble). Scam completed nearly 70%, with no turnovers. Manuel over 66% with no turnovers. Smiff over 63%, with 2 turnovers. Pryor with over 65%, with 2 turnovers, and over 100 yards rushing. And, for the final indignity of the day, Krapernick with over 400 yards and no turnovers, as he outdueled Rodgers.

Whatever we think of these black quarterbacks, the DWFs and "journalists" will be salivating over their performances. The stats cannot be denied, especially when we contrast them with the turnover laden, low percentage efforts we see nearly every week from Locker, Ponder, Gabbart, etc. Now, I firmly believe that Jake Locker, for example, is far more talented than any of the black quarterbacks. But there is nothing I can say to statistically back that up now. Sure, Locker is not being allowed to do what the black quarterbacks do. But he still struggles more than even the worst of them (Pryor, Smiff) do in their very first NFL game.

Three years ago, we saw the beginning of something when Scam Newton, who should by all rights have been a bigger bust than Jamarcus Russell, burst upon the scene and broke the existing rookie passing yardage record, while also piling up huge rushing yards. And then last year, it just got worse, with TWO magical black quarterback stories, each of them leading previously weak teams (especially the horrid Redskins) to the playoffs. So they put up great stats, and also led winning teams. How can we argue against that?

I'm afraid it's blatantly obvious that the black quarterbacks are here to stay. Something was tinkered with starting with Scam's rookie season. There is no other explanation for how even demonstrably awful "talents" like Pryor and Smiff can come in raw and pile up impressive numbers with no offensive talent around them, while Ponder and Locker struggle with more talent around them, and Gabbart looks awful with certainly at least as much talent as the Jets and Raiders have on offense.

It was great to see Edelman and Amendola shine, but why was Belichick playing tubby "Sucker Punch" Blount so much? Why did Brady lavish 14 targets on the awful Thompkins, who played so poorly even the announcers were criticizing him? And how is "Bionic" Adrian Peterson visibly faster now than ever? Running backs do not become faster with age, and Peterson is now 28, the time when most other NFL backs begin the downside of their careers. But he does have Toby Gerhart behind him, so that may be the explanation.

I understand the jubilation others feel here for the nice performances today from Jordy, Hartline and others. But I simply cannot ignore the black quarterback phenomenon, and what it means for the future of the NFL. I cannot help but believe that over half the starting QBs in the league will be black within a few years. I certainly hope I'm wrong, but what else can one think when one watches these black quarterbacks play?
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,565
Location
Pennsylvania
This season has barely started and it already smells VERY fishy. The calls, the non-calls, the promos, the all-black hype, it's truly pathetic. At least the Pats won...other than that...things are lookin bad so far in many ways.

Other than Eric Decker (who caused his own bad game) the players we follow on offense and defense did quite well.
 

BeyondFedUp

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
4,468
Location
United States
Okay, I admit that I am primarily focusing on this black quarterback thing. I just can't get past it. Today, we saw 3 new starting black quarterbacks. Each one of them put up much better than expected stats. It doesn't matter how misleading the stats may be- it is undeniable that they are all pretty much putting up good stats each week now.

Compare what EVERY black quarterback is doing now to the continuing struggles of all the young white QBs outside of Luck and Stafford. I said last week that if Smiff and Pryor, especially, didn't have a putrid game this week, then I would not accept it as legitimate. I stand by that statement. When are we going to see a Blaine Gabbart-Jimmy Clausen- Christian Ponder type of very low completion percentage, low yardage, high turnover game from ANY of these magical black quarterbacks?

Look at what happened today. Russell Wilson completed over 75% of his passes. No interceptions (did have a fumble). Scam completed nearly 70%, with no turnovers. Manuel over 66% with no turnovers. Smiff over 63%, with 2 turnovers. Pryor with over 65%, with 2 turnovers, and over 100 yards rushing. And, for the final indignity of the day, Krapernick with over 400 yards and no turnovers, as he outdueled Rodgers.

Whatever we think of these black quarterbacks, the DWFs and "journalists" will be salivating over their performances. The stats cannot be denied, especially when we contrast them with the turnover laden, low percentage efforts we see nearly every week from Locker, Ponder, Gabbart, etc. Now, I firmly believe that Jake Locker, for example, is far more talented than any of the black quarterbacks. But there is nothing I can say to statistically back that up now. Sure, Locker is not being allowed to do what the black quarterbacks do. But he still struggles more than even the worst of them (Pryor, Smiff) do in their very first NFL game.

Three years ago, we saw the beginning of something when Scam Newton, who should by all rights have been a bigger bust than Jamarcus Russell, burst upon the scene and broke the existing rookie passing yardage record, while also piling up huge rushing yards. And then last year, it just got worse, with TWO magical black quarterback stories, each of them leading previously weak teams (especially the horrid Redskins) to the playoffs. So they put up great stats, and also led winning teams. How can we argue against that?

I'm afraid it's blatantly obvious that the black quarterbacks are here to stay. Something was tinkered with starting with Scam's rookie season. There is no other explanation for how even demonstrably awful "talents" like Pryor and Smiff can come in raw and pile up impressive numbers with no offensive talent around them, while Ponder and Locker struggle with more talent around them, and Gabbart looks awful with certainly at least as much talent as the Jets and Raiders have on offense.

It was great to see Edelman and Amendola shine, but why was Belichick playing tubby "Sucker Punch" Blount so much? Why did Brady lavish 14 targets on the awful Thompkins, who played so poorly even the announcers were criticizing him? And how is "Bionic" Adrian Peterson visibly faster now than ever? Running backs do not become faster with age, and Peterson is now 28, the time when most other NFL backs begin the downside of their careers. But he does have Toby Gerhart behind him, so that may be the explanation.

I understand the jubilation others feel here for the nice performances today from Jordy, Hartline and others. But I simply cannot ignore the black quarterback phenomenon, and what it means for the future of the NFL. I cannot help but believe that over half the starting QBs in the league will be black within a few years. I certainly hope I'm wrong, but what else can one think when one watches these black quarterbacks play?

Come down from the ledge.
The black quarterbacks will return to form soon enough.
 

backrow

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Messages
7,388
Location
Spain
Okay, I admit that I am primarily focusing on this black quarterback thing. I just can't get past it. Today, we saw 3 new starting black quarterbacks. Each one of them put up much better than expected stats. It doesn't matter how misleading the stats may be- it is undeniable that they are all pretty much putting up good stats each week now.

Compare what EVERY black quarterback is doing now to the continuing struggles of all the young white QBs outside of Luck and Stafford. I said last week that if Smiff and Pryor, especially, didn't have a putrid game this week, then I would not accept it as legitimate. I stand by that statement. When are we going to see a Blaine Gabbart-Jimmy Clausen- Christian Ponder type of very low completion percentage, low yardage, high turnover game from ANY of these magical black quarterbacks?

Look at what happened today. Russell Wilson completed over 75% of his passes. No interceptions (did have a fumble). Scam completed nearly 70%, with no turnovers. Manuel over 66% with no turnovers. Smiff over 63%, with 2 turnovers. Pryor with over 65%, with 2 turnovers, and over 100 yards rushing. And, for the final indignity of the day, Krapernick with over 400 yards and no turnovers, as he outdueled Rodgers.

Whatever we think of these black quarterbacks, the DWFs and "journalists" will be salivating over their performances. The stats cannot be denied, especially when we contrast them with the turnover laden, low percentage efforts we see nearly every week from Locker, Ponder, Gabbart, etc. Now, I firmly believe that Jake Locker, for example, is far more talented than any of the black quarterbacks. But there is nothing I can say to statistically back that up now. Sure, Locker is not being allowed to do what the black quarterbacks do. But he still struggles more than even the worst of them (Pryor, Smiff) do in their very first NFL game.

Three years ago, we saw the beginning of something when Scam Newton, who should by all rights have been a bigger bust than Jamarcus Russell, burst upon the scene and broke the existing rookie passing yardage record, while also piling up huge rushing yards. And then last year, it just got worse, with TWO magical black quarterback stories, each of them leading previously weak teams (especially the horrid Redskins) to the playoffs. So they put up great stats, and also led winning teams. How can we argue against that?

I'm afraid it's blatantly obvious that the black quarterbacks are here to stay. Something was tinkered with starting with Scam's rookie season. There is no other explanation for how even demonstrably awful "talents" like Pryor and Smiff can come in raw and pile up impressive numbers with no offensive talent around them, while Ponder and Locker struggle with more talent around them, and Gabbart looks awful with certainly at least as much talent as the Jets and Raiders have on offense.

It was great to see Edelman and Amendola shine, but why was Belichick playing tubby "Sucker Punch" Blount so much? Why did Brady lavish 14 targets on the awful Thompkins, who played so poorly even the announcers were criticizing him? And how is "Bionic" Adrian Peterson visibly faster now than ever? Running backs do not become faster with age, and Peterson is now 28, the time when most other NFL backs begin the downside of their careers. But he does have Toby Gerhart behind him, so that may be the explanation.

I understand the jubilation others feel here for the nice performances today from Jordy, Hartline and others. But I simply cannot ignore the black quarterback phenomenon, and what it means for the future of the NFL. I cannot help but believe that over half the starting QBs in the league will be black within a few years. I certainly hope I'm wrong, but what else can one think when one watches these black quarterbacks play?

Peterson seems to be a freak of nature.

as far as Brady forcing the ball to the Thompkins, it is beyond comprehension, especially since he has two legitimate targets, more by half than some other QBs in the league! maybe he figured to get an idea of him for the whole season, trial by fire which he failed and we can hope he will be tuned out now...
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
It's only first week :thumbsup:. Plenty of ball left to be played.
 

GiovaniMarcon

Mentor
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
1,231
Location
Westwood, California
I think the NFL system as it used to be was an environment that made Black deficiencies difficult to conceal; as in, a quarterback had to be fast, accurate, a cool thinker, and not a complete, f**king retard in order to succeed.

As few Black quarterbacks could meet these requirements at a level that the best of their White contemporaries could (Manning, Manning, Rodgers, Brady, Big Ben, et al), the position itself was changed (as was the game in general) to dumb down the position and make a lot of the Black quarterbacks appear better than they actually are.

Defenses in the NFL are for the most part garbage; most of them suck and those that actually are good are tied down by excessive rules that are designed to let the offenses of different teams put up the maximum amount of points.

Of course these cowboy shootouts placate stupid fans but they do not represent quality defenses, just as the new style of quarterback play does not represent something BETTER than before, it only represents something EASIER to accomplish than before. It's sort of (maybe) like saying your wife is as good a driver as you because she can drive an automatic transmission and get from point A to point B, meanwhile if she tries to drive your car with a stick shift she has a helpless look on her face.

I'm not saying all Black quarterbacks suck, but I think the NFL is gradually changing rules, tinkering with selective whistles and flags here and there, and slowly adapting different roles so that Blacks appear to be better than they really are, in particular the quarterbacks.

The NFL is a consumer product so the fans are more entertained if they see lots of scoring (like the NBA, with its similar dumbed-down culture), but it is also a political product. So, while rule changes will obviously create more scoring, certain taboos, such as hiring superior White athletes who will undoubtedly produce better scoring and more stalwart defensive craftsmanship will not be hired, because the minorities-who-are-fast-becoming-majorities are too bratty and spoiled to accept simple facts. Facts like, the BEST should play, and not simply "the Blacks should play because they are Black, and Black people will stamp their feet (and loot the ghetto) if they don't get what they want."

These same rule changes have benefitted the dying breed of the Mannings and the Bradys of the league, as the rules that make mediocre Black quarterbacks appear decent have made actually-good White quarterbacks appear IMMORTAL.

I think Peyton and Tom and Aaron and the rest of our guys would have been awesome in ANY era, but I don't think they would have put up anything like the video game numbers they registered over the last ten years, if they played during the 60s and 70s.
And, of course, simpering idiots like Geno Smiff and Vince Young and the other Black quarterbacks would have gotten SLAUGHTERED like chickens.

All this of course is lost upon the average DWF, who is simply too stupid to think critically due to his or her liberal, watered-down public school education. Average fans are too braindead and possessing of an infantile attention span to appreciate a low-scoring chess match type game, with strong defenses and offenses conducted almost like military campaigns, with REAL quarterbacks at the helm, like generals. This same fan stupidity is why actually good boxers from the former Soviet Union are dismissed, as 70IQed, fish-eyed American fans are looking for a "spectacular" Mike Tyson to knock out some other anonymous, Black bums.

In a way, our society's downfall (as represented by sports, among more important things) is a fascinating topic of study, morbid as it might be.
 
Last edited:

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,565
Location
Pennsylvania
It's only first week :thumbsup:. Plenty of ball left to be played.



And lots of nice performances on offense and defense -- note to those who only see doom and gloom no matter how well White NFL players do.
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
And lots of nice performances on offense and defense -- note to those who only see doom and gloom.

Agreed Jordy showed flashes of dominance today coming off of that knee injury and had the catch of the week if not year. Edelman was a nice surprise today and he's due for a break out year, Brady trusts him. Amendola showed some toughness today coming back from a hard hit and playing well down the stretch. Texans D will be fun to watch tomorrow night.

*Meanwhile bonehead rookie receiver runs wrong route and leads to Romo being picked off. Where is Coale and Beasley?!!
 

white is right

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
10,177
Wow, talk about quarterbacks wearing skirts.

The bright side is that the pressure will be on Josh Freeman more than ever before.
Yes I saw the play live and thought he was inbounds and the call was rather ticky tack to determine the game. NBA officials must be coaching NFL officials.....
 

dwid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
4,254
Location
Louisiana
Come down from the ledge.
The black quarterbacks will return to form soon enough.
Exactly. Scam has won 4 games when the playoffs were still in the picture

4 qbs played against each other. Two HAD to win. I think u would have to be a big Dwf if u watched jets bucs and thought "wow" like in the literal sense, plastered. The only interesting part was the kicking game and the ref screw up
Plus the Redskins play the Eagles so one more black quarterback will have to win.

Freeman fumbled the ball out of the end zone and threw a pick and both just dinked and dunked

russel Wilson. May have thrown for 320 and completed 75% but scores 1 td. The game was 12 to 7 . Garbage stats. Game was not watchable


Manuel threw for 150 yards. Newton for 125 .

i would say the only qbs Dwfs were impressed w were Colin and Pryor, and I expected Pryor to do at least decent against the colts defense. They got rid of tommy z when he was great when starting and he still threw two picks to one td. He looked great running but it's a passing league
 
Last edited:

foobar75

Master
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
2,332
WTF is with these commercials on SNF? First was that Toyota Corolla one, now the Nike one with P-Diddy and Calvin Johnson. It's not just Subway or McDonalds, the whole damn country has officially gone 365 black.
 

foobar75

Master
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
2,332
And lots of nice performances on offense and defense -- note to those who only see doom and gloom no matter how well White NFL players do.

Also, another piece of good news is that the long-awaited decline of PIT, which finally began last year as some of us here predicted, appears to be right on schedule. As almost all of Bill Cowher's players have either left, retired, or simply gotten old, plus years of stock-piling the team with affletes who simply aren't good enough, the racist Mike Tomlin is about to be exposed for the fraud that he is.

Tomlin is simply the beneficiary of the absurd AA policies of the NFL, some of which have been put in place by the ownership of the team he coaches.
 

Pie

Guru
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Messages
277
Location
Dallas, Tx
God, I am so tired of fat, out of shape, D-lineman on the Giants faking injuries to stop the hurry-up so they can catch their breaths.
 

TwentyTwo

Master
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
3,642
Location
Louisiana
Nice to see Jordy Nelson back! 7-130-1 TD + Possibly the best grab of the day! Now 23 TD's in his last 29 games!

As impressive as Peterson's long TD run was...the rest of the day the Lions D put the clamps on him...17 carries for ONLY 15 yards!

The Wes Welker Old Spice commercial is pretty cool...
 

Pie

Guru
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Messages
277
Location
Dallas, Tx
That's pretty much every dline. And ppl ask why don't teams run the hurry up all game long, this is why, plus the increase of sumos on oline. Wonder how the eagles no huddle will look.

You're right, it's not exclusive to them, but the Giants look to be the worst offenders by such a wide margin that it's got to be coached.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,565
Location
Pennsylvania
Also, another piece of good news is that the long-awaited decline of PIT, which finally began last year as some of us here predicted, appears to be right on schedule. As almost all of Bill Cowher's players have either left, retired, or simply gotten old, plus years of stock-piling the team with affletes who simply aren't good enough, the racist Mike Tomlin is about to be exposed for the fraud that he is.

Tomlin is simply the beneficiary of the absurd AA policies of the NFL, some of which have been put in place by the ownership of the team he coaches.

And now their Negro center Pouncey, one of their few good draft choices during the Tomlin era, is out for the season.
 

Borussia

Guru
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
231
Location
Florida
media hack journalist eat your heart out

I think the NFL system as it used to be was an environment that made Black deficiencies difficult to conceal; as in, a quarterback had to be fast, accurate, a cool thinker, and not a complete, f**king retard in order to succeed.

As few Black quarterbacks could meet these requirements at a level that the best of their White contemporaries could (Manning, Manning, Rodgers, Brady, Big Ben, et al), the position itself was changed (as was the game in general) to dumb down the position and make a lot of the Black quarterbacks appear better than they actually are.

Defenses in the NFL are for the most part garbage; most of them suck and those that actually are good are tied down by excessive rules that are designed to let the offenses of different teams put up the maximum amount of points.

Of course these cowboy shootouts placate stupid fans but they do not represent quality defenses, just as the new style of quarterback play does not represent something BETTER than before, it only represents something EASIER to accomplish than before. It's sort of (maybe) like saying your wife is as good a driver as you because she can drive an automatic transmission and get from point A to point B, meanwhile if she tries to drive your car with a stick shift she has a helpless look on her face.

I'm not saying all Black quarterbacks suck, but I think the NFL is gradually changing rules, tinkering with selective whistles and flags here and there, and slowly adapting different roles so that Blacks appear to be better than they really are, in particular the quarterbacks.

The NFL is a consumer product so the fans are more entertained if they see lots of scoring (like the NBA, with its similar dumbed-down culture), but it is also a political product. So, while rule changes will obviously create more scoring, certain taboos, such as hiring superior White athletes who will undoubtedly produce better scoring and more stalwart defensive craftsmanship will not be hired, because the minorities-who-are-fast-becoming-majorities are too bratty and spoiled to accept simple facts. Facts like, the BEST should play, and not simply "the Blacks should play because they are Black, and Black people will stamp their feet (and loot the ghetto) if they don't get what they want."

These same rule changes have benefitted the dying breed of the Mannings and the Bradys of the league, as the rules that make mediocre Black quarterbacks appear decent have made actually-good White quarterbacks appear IMMORTAL.

I think Peyton and Tom and Aaron and the rest of our guys would have been awesome in ANY era, but I don't think they would have put up anything like the video game numbers they registered over the last ten years, if they played during the 60s and 70s.
And, of course, simpering idiots like Geno Smiff and Vince Young and the other Black quarterbacks would have gotten SLAUGHTERED like chickens.

All this of course is lost upon the average DWF, who is simply too stupid to think critically due to his or her liberal, watered-down public school education. Average fans are too braindead and possessing of an infantile attention span to appreciate a low-scoring chess match type game, with strong defenses and offenses conducted almost like military campaigns, with REAL quarterbacks at the helm, like generals. This same fan stupidity is why actually good boxers from the former Soviet Union are dismissed, as 70IQed, fish-eyed American fans are looking for a "spectacular" Mike Tyson to knock out some other anonymous, Black bums.

In a way, our society's downfall (as represented by sports, among more important things) is a fascinating topic of study, morbid as it might be.

Honestly, one of the best and most interesting things I've read on the internet this whole year.
Thank you.

And totally on the mark on so many levels. Excellent analysis and commentary
 

Borussia

Guru
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
231
Location
Florida
Open Agenda

WTF is with these commercials on SNF? First was that Toyota Corolla one, now the Nike one with P-Diddy and Calvin Johnson. It's not just Subway or McDonalds, the whole damn country has officially gone 365 black.

Yes, but the key question is who and what precisely benefits from such marketing?
WHY is the advertising and pop culture generally aimed at black coolness?

who and what precisely benefits?
 

Truthteller

Mentor
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
1,205
Peterson seems to be a freak of nature.

I was watching the Pat/Bills and saw Peterson had 1 carry for 78 yards and 1 TD to begin the day. He finished with 93 yards on 18 carries, 2 TD's. So, after that first run "Suppaman" ran 17 times for 16 yards?

By the way, no carries for Toby and I'm sure Peterson's "struggles" after that initial long run will no doubt be attributed to Christian Ponder not being good enough.

Hopefully Ponder can turn it around. Denny Green started bringing in black QB's in the early 1990's. Vikings remained pretty much all black at QB for two decades, much like the Eagles and Houston and Tennessee have/had been.
 

BeyondFedUp

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
4,468
Location
United States
Yes, but the key question is who and what precisely benefits from such marketing?
WHY is the advertising and pop culture generally aimed at black coolness?

who and what precisely benefits?

Answer: The self-serving, anti-Christ, ruling jewish elites headed by their Bilderberger cohorts are they who benefit (at Whites' expense) and their NWO agenda is what precisely benefits.
 
Last edited:
Top