Nationalist Socialism

[C Darwin]

Honestly, does it mean anything more than the willingness to sacrifice some personal liberties to ensure the survival of ones folk?

all libertarians must post.

 

[Westside]

The survival of one's race should be taken by the individual and support similar groupthink masses. Sacrificing one liberty is unacceptable. This system as well as communism belongs on the trash heap of history and only learn never to cradle it again.

 

[Riddlewire]

Honestly, does it mean anything more than the willingness to sacrifice some personal liberties to ensure the survival of ones folk?

all libertarians must post.

You inadvertently identified the problem with your wording.
This concept, "survival of one's folk" is not possible in a multicultural society. Because it's not just "your folk" that are getting the benefits of YOUR "shared wealth". It's all the detritus and refuse that has infiltrated your society and latched on to the nation's tax spigot.

Apologies if I misunderstood the specific nature of your question. Since the most relevant issue with modern socialism is personal wealth, rather than personal "liberties" (of course, the two go hand in hand, but that's a much longer discussion).

 

[C Darwin]

i'll throw this out there...

is social darwinism and NS incompatible?

 

[C Darwin]

This concept, "survival of one's folk" is not possible in a multicultural society.

right! that is why we must unite as a nation. Edited by: C Darwin

 

[Paleocon]

Does nationalism require socialism? Presumably a nationalist state would require protectionist economic policies, isolationist or non-interventionist foreign policy, and immigration restriction; however, I'm not sure what "rights" need to be curtailed. Or that state ownership of the means of production is necessary.




Edited by: Paleocon

 

[jaxvid]

Does nationalism require socialism?  Presumably a nationalist state would require protectionist economic policies, isolationist or non-interventionist foreign policy, and immigration restriction; however, I'm not sure what "rights" need to be curtailed.  Or that state ownership of the means of production is necessary. 

Exactly! and well put! In a theoretical all white homeland there would be no need and no justification for socialism of any kind. However IF some sort of socialism existed it would probably work okay, as advanced white societies can create an orderly government from just about any kind of system.

 

[C Darwin]

...as advanced white societies can create an orderly government from just about any kind of system.

would you call the original united states a nationalist capitalist government? and would you want to reuse that model?


sure whites can make things civil under any circumstances, but what i'm trying to get to the root of is what will sustain. Edited by: C Darwin