Nationalist Socialism

Discussion in 'Happy Hour' started by C Darwin, Oct 6, 2010.

  1. C Darwin

    C Darwin Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,181
    Location:
    New York
    Honestly, does it mean anything more than the willingness to sacrifice some personal liberties to ensure the survival of ones folk?

    all libertarians must post.
     
  2. Westside

    Westside Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    7,703
    Location:
    So Cal
    The survival of one's race should be taken by the individual and support similar groupthink masses. Sacrificing one liberty is unacceptable. This system as well as communism belongs on the trash heap of history and only learn never to cradle it again.
     
  3. Riddlewire

    Riddlewire Master

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,564
    You inadvertently identified the problem with your wording.
    This concept, "survival of one's folk" is not possible in a multicultural society. Because it's not just "your folk" that are getting the benefits of YOUR "shared wealth". It's all the detritus and refuse that has infiltrated your society and latched on to the nation's tax spigot.

    Apologies if I misunderstood the specific nature of your question. Since the most relevant issue with modern socialism is personal wealth, rather than personal "liberties" (of course, the two go hand in hand, but that's a much longer discussion).
     
  4. C Darwin

    C Darwin Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,181
    Location:
    New York
    i'll throw this out there...

    is social darwinism and NS incompatible?
     
  5. C Darwin

    C Darwin Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,181
    Location:
    New York
    right! that is why we must unite as a nation. Edited by: C Darwin
     
  6. Paleocon

    Paleocon Guru

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    330
    Location:
    On the far Right
    Does nationalism require socialism? Presumably a nationalist state would require protectionist economic policies, isolationist or non-interventionist foreign policy, and immigration restriction; however, I'm not sure what "rights" need to be curtailed. Or that state ownership of the means of production is necessary.




    Edited by: Paleocon
     
  7. jaxvid

    jaxvid Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,247
    Location:
    Michigan
    Exactly! and well put! In a theoretical all white homeland there would be no need and no justification for socialism of any kind. However IF some sort of socialism existed it would probably work okay, as advanced white societies can create an orderly government from just about any kind of system.
     
  8. C Darwin

    C Darwin Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,181
    Location:
    New York
    would you call the original united states a nationalist capitalist government? and would you want to reuse that model?


    sure whites can make things civil under any circumstances, but what i'm trying to get to the root of is what will sustain. Edited by: C Darwin
     

Share This Page