Top White Fighters

[Gary]

Another great article Joe!! It is really good to see so many fine young White fighters. Here are a few more who could make the list in the near future, Brain Magee, Bernard Dunne, John Duddy, Paul Briggs, Stipe Drews and Sultan Ibragimov. Keep up the good work, your articles really pump me up!

Edited by: Gary

 

[jaxvid]

Joe, great article! Really like to read about all the talented white fighters. Perfect to show boxing skeptics here in the USA that don't hear much about those guys.

 

[Bunnyman]

Joey Gilbert (who KO'd Jimmy Lange on Saturday) may be a white American to add to the list if he keeps winning. Also, Mike Marrone, an undefeated, 20-year-old heavyweight, will fight on ESPN this Friday. He might be a white American to watch as well.

 

[Gary]

Scott Harrison [Scotland] WBO Featherweight Champion could go on the list and Travis Kauffman [US] Heavyweight is one to keep an eye on in the future.

 

[speedster]

Who is Joe Kowalski?I know he must be a regular poster on this site,but who?

 

[Bart]

I saw this little video clip at Youtube. Whites are starting to dominate in every category of fighting.Many more recent highlights and fighters could be added.This features some Slav's but many other white fighters could be added from around the world. I would like to see somebody make something similar showing strongmen.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zd2i7Ej_Yx8

 

[White Shogun]

Wow! Awesome video, Bart, a great find. Thanks for posting it.

 

[Liverlips]

I wonder if Lucien Bute will move into Joe's list soon? He was certainly very impressive last night against Bika. Just look at the monsters we have at 168:


Calzaghe, Kessler, Bute, Froch, Green, Inkin, Oganov, Beyer, Manfredo and others. Very soon, Kelly Pavlik will be moving up to 168 as well.

 

[KG2422]

Yeah, really cool find Bart.

 

[SneakyQuick]

Does anyone have the original article here either? It appears to be missing

 

[Don Wassall]

Does anyone have the original article here either? It appears to be missing

That's because it's a thread that's been inactive for 15 years. 15 year old articles are often long gone from the internet. I can see posting on a few J. B. Cash threads, but your apparent aim is to post on all of them. Why?

 

[SneakyQuick]

Because they are well written and because they’ve been so long dormant it’s kind of like a time capsule.

if you don’t have them anymore it’s fine.

I just thought they made better reading than most.

I don’t know if this an issue for you? I’ll stop if you want.

 

[Don Wassall]

One of the unwritten rules here is that long-dormant threads are left that way unless there's a very pertinent reason to go back to them. They were discussed at the time and then naturally became inactive. Posting things like "Thank you sir" which you did on a thread whose last post was in 2007 serves no purpose. It's posting just to post rather than adding any new or novel insight to the original article. It's better to read the articles and learn from them about the Caste System, as I don't think you have an understanding of it yet, and post on active threads.