referendum
Mentor
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2005
- Messages
- 1,687
I'm strongly supportive of unification attempts in the heavyweight division, but I'm wondering whats going to happen with multiple mandatory defenses with a unified champ. Assuming Klitschko unifies the IBF and WBO, then wouldn't he be facing mandatory defenses against the IBF mandatory (either Povetkin or Chambers), and Thompson the WBO mandatory. If he wins a third belt, then he'd be facing a third mandatory. What if he doesn't want to fight all these guys and is stripped of one of his belts?
Wouldn't it be better to have a box-off of the eliminator winners, so Thompson would fight Povetkin/Chambers for instance. How were things done when there was a unified champ?
Wouldn't it be better to have a box-off of the eliminator winners, so Thompson would fight Povetkin/Chambers for instance. How were things done when there was a unified champ?