Thomas L. Friedman, the New York Times columnist who may well be the most influential of all Permanent Regime media mouthpieces, is a Zionist and a neo-con, though he comes across as slightly more sensible (or less insane, take your pick) than other neo-cons. He supports American militarism in the Middle East for the purpose of "democratizing" the Arab world, but acknowledges mistakes have been made in the occupation of Iraq, etc. He's basically a kinder, gentler version of Perle and Wolfowitz.
At any rate, I usually ignore his column but for some reason it caught my eye yesterday. Maybe it was because of the name of the Navy warship he is currently on and writing from -- the USS Chosin.
Yes, that the name of it.
The sub-heading of this particular column is: "The diversity in the U.S. military challenges Iraqis. But does our example inspire or just baffle?"
"Repulse" would be a better description. It certainly does me after reading this: "The other thing that hits you on the Chosin is that many officers are women -- so you hear women's voices all day long giving orders over the ship's loudspeaker and radio. And because the local Arab fishermen also hear this chatter, many of them probably think the Chosin is an all-female ship! The 110-foot U.S. Coast Guard cutter Monomoy, alongside the Chosin, has a female executive officer, who often leads the landing parties that inspect boats in the gulf; one of the Navy's fast patrol boats, also alongside the Chosin, had a female captain. . ."
American "diversity" of course means the replacement of whites by non-whites, and the replacement of men by women -- even in the military!!! The Cultural Marxism is relentless and will not slow, even in the military where it is getting tougher and tougher to sign up recruits. What kind of "man" wants to join a female-dominated military? Does Friedman seriously think any culture anywhere in the world will voluntarily accept a female supremacist order without it being imposed either through manipulation of a culture's media and educational systems, or through war?
This is all part and parcel of Washington's world revolutionary campaign of implementing "democracy" by guns and bombs. How does such sickness exist in nature, much less have control of the most powerful government in the world?
At any rate, I usually ignore his column but for some reason it caught my eye yesterday. Maybe it was because of the name of the Navy warship he is currently on and writing from -- the USS Chosin.
The sub-heading of this particular column is: "The diversity in the U.S. military challenges Iraqis. But does our example inspire or just baffle?"
"Repulse" would be a better description. It certainly does me after reading this: "The other thing that hits you on the Chosin is that many officers are women -- so you hear women's voices all day long giving orders over the ship's loudspeaker and radio. And because the local Arab fishermen also hear this chatter, many of them probably think the Chosin is an all-female ship! The 110-foot U.S. Coast Guard cutter Monomoy, alongside the Chosin, has a female executive officer, who often leads the landing parties that inspect boats in the gulf; one of the Navy's fast patrol boats, also alongside the Chosin, had a female captain. . ."
American "diversity" of course means the replacement of whites by non-whites, and the replacement of men by women -- even in the military!!! The Cultural Marxism is relentless and will not slow, even in the military where it is getting tougher and tougher to sign up recruits. What kind of "man" wants to join a female-dominated military? Does Friedman seriously think any culture anywhere in the world will voluntarily accept a female supremacist order without it being imposed either through manipulation of a culture's media and educational systems, or through war?
This is all part and parcel of Washington's world revolutionary campaign of implementing "democracy" by guns and bombs. How does such sickness exist in nature, much less have control of the most powerful government in the world?
