The speech that got John F Kennedy killed

[Charles Martel]

John F Kennedy was assassinated 48 years ago. I remember the day well. While walking home from elementary school that cold November afternoon, I remember having a feeling something had happened. Then, I heard the news when I arrived home.

A speech JFK had made some weeks before expressed his determination to stand up to the supremacists. It was probably what made them finally decide to take him out. Here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFzlNWyP6rI&feature=related

He was the last president who ever really stood up to them.

A few years later, Richard Nixon in a conversation with Billy Graham talked about how he "dared not say" anything about them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRg7xvWyYog

Graham in that conversation referred to them as "The Synagogue of Satan" prophesized in the Bible's Book of Revelation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPQpAbu5xFQ

Nixon and Graham were correct, they do control the media, that's why the politicians cater to them:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xddhtPZu3Bk&feature=related

 

[werewolf]

"He was the last president who ever really stood up to them. "

That is the truth. JFK demanded that the Israeli's nuclear weapons facility at Dimona be opened up for inspection. Three months later he was dead.

JFK's widow was convinced that the zionist arch traitor LBJ was behind the assassination of her husband. The Kennedy family is supposed to be releasing the complete details about this shortly, including the Jacqueline Kennedy tapes.

Jackie Kennedy believed LBJ had her husband killed new tape shows

Read more: http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Ja...n-for-JFK-Murder-127220093.html#ixzz1emJ29ols
​

The Most Revealing Wink of the Twentieth Century

Congressman Albert Thomas winks back at a quickly-smiling LBJ as he is being sworn in to be the next President of the United States on Air Force One while the grief-stricken Jackie Kennedy stands next to him.

 

[werewolf]

The assassination of JFK was a coup d'etat. In essence the Jews seized complete control of the USA. And if anyone doesn't think that's true they need to learn about the sneak attack on the USS Liberty and the joint Tel Aviv-Washington DC 911 false flag attacks.

 

[Charles Martel]

The assassination of JFK was a coup d'etat. In essence the Jews seized complete control of the USA. And if anyone doesn't think that's true they need to learn about the sneak attack on the USS Liberty and the joint Tel Aviv-Washington DC 911 false flag attacks.

Yes. They became bolder after the JFK assassination.

They must have felt if they could get away with murdering a US president in broad daylight, they could get away with almost anything.

 

[Charles Martel]

Excerpt from Chapter 5 of Michael Collin Piper’s underground bestseller: “Final Judgement.â€

The history books have told us of John F. Kennedy’s epic struggles with Fidel Castro and the Soviets in the Bay of Pigs debacle and the Cuban Missile Crisis.​

Yet, only in recent years have we begun to learn of Kennedy’s secret war with Israel. Much of the conflict stemmed from Israel’s determination to build a nuclear bomb.
​

This is a hidden history that helps explain in part the dynamic forces at work resulting in Kennedy’s assassination.
​

By mid-1963 Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion hated Kennedy with a passion. In fact, he considered JFK a threat to the very survival of the Jewish State.​

One of John F. Kennedy’s first presidential appointments was naming his former campaign aide Myer (Mike) Feldman as his point man for Jewish and Israeli affairs—an important post, especially considering JFK’s tenuous relationship with Israel and its American lobby.​

Myer "Mike" Feldman

According to author Seymour Hersh, “The President viewed Feldman, whose strong support for Israel was widely known, as a necessary evil whose highly visible White House position was a political debt that had to be paid.â€79​

However, the administration was determined to make certain, according to Hersh, that nobody—Feldman in particular—would be able to circumvent any administration policy insofar as the Middle East was concerned.
​

“The President’s most senior advisors, most acutely McGeorge Bundy, the national security advisor, desperately sought to cut Feldman out of the flow of Middle East paperwork.â€80
​

Hersh quotes another presidential aide as having said, “It was hard to tell the difference between what Feldman said and what the Israeli ambassador said.â€

ZIONISTS IN THE CABINET ROOM​

President Kennedy himself had his own suspicions about Feldman, according to the president’s close friend, Charles Bartlett (to whom Kennedy in 1960 had previously voiced concerns about Israeli influence as noted in Chapter 4).​

Bartlett recalls a visit with the new President at his home in Hyannis Port, Massachusetts one Saturday (the Jewish Sabbath). Talk turned to Feldman’s role in the White House bureaucracy. “I imagine Mike’s having a meeting of the Zionists in the cabinet room,†the president said, according to Bartlett. 82​

The President’s brother, Robert Kennedy, himself said that his brother admired Feldman’s work, but added, “His major interest was Israel rather than the United States.â€83
However, while Myer Feldman was busy promoting Israel’s interests at the White House, the president was sending out a message to the rest of the foreign policy-making establishment in Washington.Kennedy was making it clear that he was very much interested in finding a path to peace in the Middle East and was, in particular, looking for ways to solve the problem of finding a home for the Palestinian refugees who had been displaced by Israel in 1948.​

 

[Charles Martel]

KENNEDY’S GOOD INTENTIONS

According to Hersh, “State Department Arabists were pleasantly surprised early in 1961 to get word from the White House, according to [one source], that ‘just because 90 percent of the Jewish vote had gone for Kennedy, it didn’t mean he was in their pocket.’”84
Former high-ranking U.S. diplomat Richard H. Curtiss, writing in A Changing Image: American Perceptions of the Arab-Israeli Dispute, elaborated on Kennedy’s attitude toward the Middle East controversy. In a chapter appropriately titled: “President Kennedy and Good Intentions Deferred Too Long,” Curtiss comments:

“It is surprising to realize, with the benefit of hindsight, that from the time Kennedy entered office as the narrowly-elected candidate of a party heavily dependent upon Jewish support, he was planning to take a whole new look at U.S. Mideast policy.

“He obviously could not turn the clock back and undo the work of President Truman, his Democratic predecessor, in making the establishment of Israel possible. Nor, perhaps, would he have wanted to. “

"Kennedy was determined, however, to develop good new personal relationships with individual Arab leaders, including those with whom the previous administration’s relations had deteriorated.

“As a result, various leaders of newly independent countries were surprised to find their pro forma messages of congratulations upon Kennedy’s assumption of office answered with personalized letters from the young American President.” 85

OLIVE BRANCH TO NASSER

The key Arab leader at the time was Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser, the voice of Pan-Arabism. Kennedy was especially intrigued with the possibility of opening up relations with Nasser.

According to Kennedy associate, Theodore Sorensen, “Nasser liked Kennedy’s Ambassador, John Badeau, and he liked Kennedy’s practice of personal correspondence. Kennedy put off, however, an invitation for a Nasser visit until improved relations could enable him to answer the political attacks such a visit would bring from voters more sympathetic to Israel.”86

(Unfortunately, however, as noted by Richard Curtiss, “As with most good intentions deferred, the invitation to Nasser for a personal meeting with Kennedy was never issued.”87)

Thus, it was that upon assuming office, Kennedy made positive attempts to contact Arab heads of state asking how the U.S. could help each country in its individual disputes with Israel.

STANDING BY TRADITION

However, Kennedy wanted one thing in particular understood by all sides in the conflict: the new U.S. president wanted “to make it crystal clear that the U.S. meant what it said in the Tripartite Declaration of 1950—that we will act promptly and decisively against any nation in the Middle East which attacks its neighbor.”88 This policy was directed not only to the Arabs, but Israel as well. Kennedy did indeed mean business.

ISRAEL’S LOBBY REACTS

Soon after Kennedy assumed office, Israel and its American lobby began to understand the import of Kennedy’s positioning in regard to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Israel was not happy—to say the very least—and began putting heat on the White House through the egis of its supporters in Congress, many of whom relied upon support from the Israeli lobby for campaign contributions and political leverage.
According to America’s most noted longtime Jewish critic of Israel, Dr. Alfred Lilienthal:

“While the President, more often through Vice President Lyndon Johnson, gave much lip service to Israelist aspirations, his administration continued to resist pressures, including a round-robin petition signed by 226 Congressmen of both parties (aided by a large New York Times advertisement on May 28, 1962) to initiate direct Arab-Israeli negotiations. Kennedy had decided to shelve his pledge in the Democratic platform to bring Israeli and Arab leaders together around a peace table in order to settle the Palestine question.”89​

 

[Charles Martel]

AMERICA—NOT ISRAEL—FIRST

Stephen Green believes that Kennedy’s position vis-à-vis Israel was an important stand: “It was a remarkable exchange, and the last time for many, many years in which an American president precisely distinguished for the government of Israel the differences between U.S. and Israeli national security interests.”101Thus it was that John F. Kennedy informed Israel, in no uncertain terms, that he intended—first and foremost—to place America’s interests—not Israel’s interests—at the center of U.S. Middle East policy.

NUCLEAR EXPANSION

This set the groundwork for further tension between the U.S. and Israel over an even more explosive issue: Israel’s determination to build a nuclear bomb. Israel had been engaged in nuclear development during the past decade but continued to insist that its nuclear programs were strictly peaceful in nature. However, the facts prove otherwise.

In order to thoroughly examine Kennedy’s conflict with Israel over the Zionist State’s nuclear intentions, we once again refer to Stephen Green’s aforementioned work, Taking Sides: America’s Secret Relations With a Militant Israel, a treasure trove of little known information relating to U.S.-Israeli relations from the period of 1948 through 1967. Green writes of JFK’s discovery that Israel was engaged in nuclear arms development.When Kennedy was coming into office in the transition period in December 1960 the

Eisenhower administration informed Kennedy of Israel’s secret nuclear weapons development at a site in the desert known as Dimona. Israel had advanced several cover stories to explain its activities at Dimona.

A ‘HIGHLY DISTRESSING’ SITUATION

Israel had kept the nuclear weapons program as secret as possible, but US intelligence had discovered the project. Kennedy termed the situation “highly distressing.”102

Kennedy, upon taking office, determined that he would make efforts to derail Israel’s nuclear weapons development. Nuclear proliferation was to be one of Kennedy’s primary concerns.

Israel’s intended entry into the nuclear arena was, as a consequence, a frightening prospect in JFK’s mind, particularly in light of ongoing conflict in the Middle East.From the very beginning of his presidency, John F. Kennedy found himself at severe odds with the government of Israel. It was a conflict that would never really be resolved until the day JFK died in Dallas. It was not an auspicious start for the New Frontier.​

 

[Charles Martel]

Meet Jacob Rubenstein (aka Jack Ruby):

http://incogman.net/11/2010/meet-jacob-rubenstein-aka-jack-ruby/

Walter Cronkite once said:

“I can’t think of any group – with the exception of Israeli intelligence that would have been able to keep the JFK assassination under wraps for so long.”

 

[werewolf]

Meet Jacob Rubenstein (aka Jack Ruby):

http://incogman.net/11/2010/meet-jacob-rubenstein-aka-jack-ruby/

...

Incogman has a great website. He used to post on the late great Liberty Forum.

 

[werewolf]

Yes. They became bolder after the JFK assassination.

They must have felt if they could get away with murdering a US president in broad daylight, they could get away with almost anything.

And after the murderous sneak attack on the USS Liberty - with the full aid and cooperation of the US government in Washington - they knew they could get away with anything - and they proved it on 911.

President Johnson's accomplice, Secretary of Defense Macnamara, who helped him order the fighter planes racing to aid the besieged Liberty to make a u-turn so that the Israelis could kill every man on board - "I want that goddamned ship on the ocean floor!" screamed LBJ - is still alive. If we had a real American government in power he'd be hanging by his neck.


ww