Crudely worded article, but illustrative of the many sick double standards that exist today in regard to what is denounced as "controversial" and what is considered acceptable.
<H3>Jewess Student, Aliza Shvarts, of Yale, artificially inseminates herself multiple times and aborts fetuses and calls it art</H3>
Posted by Europe on Jan 26, 2010 | 24 Comments
<DIV ="entry">
<DIV style="WIDTH: 295px" ="wp-caption alignright">
Yale Jewess Student, Aliza Shvarts
I guess the point is, it's better to be a Jewess that engages in degenerate and sick acts, and calls them art, by artificially inseminating herself over and over again, over nine months, and then aborts the fetuses that resulted over and over than to be a White male or a racist. That's the message I get out of this publicity stunt anyway. It's interesting that a Yale student can do this and the faculty and administration say nothing, but oh my God, let a Yale student pass out a few flyers calling attention to the fact that the entire media apparatus is in the hands of ethnic Jews, and they'd calling for an inquisition.
If you'd like to contact the student Aliza Shvarts, here's her email address. Why don't you ask her who she thinks is worse, a racially conscious White person or a murdering Jewess. aliza.shvarts@yale.edu
Art major Aliza Shvarts ‘08 wants to make a statement.
Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself "as often as possible"Â while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.
The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts' project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock â€" saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.
But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for "shock value."Â [Sure]
"I hope it inspires some sort of discourse,"Â Shvarts said. "Sure, some people will be upset with the message and will not agree with it, but it's not the intention of the piece to scandalize anyone."Â ["Some people" implies not very many, implying it isn't that big of a deal]
The "fabricators,"Â or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but Shvarts required them to periodically take tests for sexually transmitted diseases. She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body. The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said, and she did not feel the need to consult a doctor about her repeated miscarriages.
Shvarts declined to specify the number of sperm donors she used, as well as the number of times she inseminated herself.
Art major Juan Castillo ‘08 said that although he was intrigued by the
creativity and beauty of her senior project, not everyone was as thrilled as he was by the concept and the means by which she attained the result. [Murder is apparently "creative" and "beautiful." Imagine that?]
"I really loved the idea of this project, but a lot other people didn?t,"Â Castillo said. "I think that most people were very resistant to thinking about what the project was really about. [The senior-art-project forum] stopped being a conversation on the work itself."Â
Although Shvarts said she does not remember the class being quite as hostile as Castillo described, she said she believes it is the nature of her piece to"Âprovoke inquiry."Â
"I believe strongly that art should be a medium for politics and ideologies, not just a commodity,"Â Shvarts said. "I think that I'm creating a project that lives up to the standard of what art is supposed to be."Â
The display of Schvarts' project will feature a large cube suspended from the ceiling of a room in the gallery of Green Hall. Schvarts will wrap hundreds of feet of plastic sheeting around this cube; lined between layers of the sheeting will be the blood from Schvarts' self-induced miscarriages mixed with Vaseline in order to prevent the blood from drying and to extend the blood throughout the plastic sheeting. [Isn't that special?]
Schvarts will then project recorded videos onto the four sides of the cube. These videos, captured on a VHS camcorder, will show her experiencing miscarriages in her bathrooom tub, she said. Similar videos will be projected onto the walls of the room.
School of Art lecturer Pia Lindman [Also Jewish], Schvarts' senior-project advisor, could not be reached for comment Wednesday night.
Few people outside of Yale's undergraduate art department have heard about Shvarts' exhibition. Members of two campus abortion-activist groups â€" Choose Life at Yale, a pro-life group, and the Reproductive Rights Action League of Yale, a pro-choice group â€" said they were not previously aware of Schvarts' project.
Alice Buttrick ‘10, an officer of RALY, said the group was in no way involved with the art exhibition and had no official opinion on the matter.
Sara Rahman [A Muslim, but don't expect anyone to tell you. Muslims aren't nearly as corrupt as are western women.] ‘09 said, in her opinion, Shvarts is abusing her constitutional right to do what she chooses with her body.
"[Shvarts' exhibit] turns what is a serious decision for women into an absurdism,"Â Rahman said. "It discounts the gravity of the situation that is abortion."Â
CLAY member Jonathan Serrato ‘09 said he does not think CLAY has an official response to Schvarts' exhibition. But personally, Serrato said he found the concept of the senior art project "surprising" and unethical. [A wonder why he didn't use the term "shocking?" Possibly because the term "shocking" tends to belong to Jews exclusively. I'm thinking only Jews can be "shocked."].
"I feel that she's manipulating life for the benefit of her art, and I definitely don't support it,"Â Serrato said. "I think it's morally wrong."Â
Shvarts emphasized that she is not ashamed of her exhibition, and she has become increasingly comfortable discussing her miscarriage experiences with her peers. [It comes as no surprise to me she doesn't feel badly. If you send her an email don't bother telling her what she did is wrong, she'll never "get it," just tell her you know she's Jewish and you intend to point that out to as many people as you possibly can].
"It was a private and personal endeavor, but also a transparent one for the most part,"Â Shvarts said. "This isn't something I've been hiding."Â
The official reception for the Undergraduate Senior Art Show will be from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on April 25. The exhibition will be on public display from April 22 to May 1. The art exhibition is set to premiere alongside the projects of other art seniors this Tuesday, April 22 at the gallery of Holcombe T. Green Jr. Hall on Chapel Street.
Yale is calling it "fiction"Â but her claims and behavior is demented. Whether or not the blood used was real, she has produced art depicting blood from fetuses and video. She left out the body parts obviously, but the 'schtick' is real.
"The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman's body,"Â said Helaine S. Klasky, associate dean and vice president for public affairs at Yale. "Ms. Shvarts is engaged in performance art. Her art project includes visual representations, a press release and other narrative materials."Â
"She is an artist and has the right to express herself through performance art,"Â Klasky said in the statement.
The stomach-turning display will be showcased next week â€" complete with depictions of blood samples and videos purportedly from the terminated pregnancies.
This Jewess @ Yale is featured in an ‘Art Exhibit' â€" Fact
Her ‘Art' will be supposed aborted fetus â€" Fact
She alleges she impregnated herself â€" Fact
Now whether or not she had an abortion, is besides the point.
She is parading a sickness, that of Jew sponsored Infanticide (Ritual Baby Slaughter) upon Christian America, and making a mockery of the dead in so doing. And is calling it "Art"Â"¦
And she says: "I believe art should be a medium for politics and ideologies, not just a commodity."Â This person cannot even PROJECT any other motivational human force behind creative acts such as "art"Â.
So for those who doubt"¦ maybe you should go to her art exhibit, the date was provided, take some photos and report back, of all that you supposedly "didn't" see at this "fake" story.
<DIV ="entry">
<H3>http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/jewess-student-aliza-shvarts-of-yale-artificially-inseminates-herself-multiple-times-and-aborts-fetuses-and-calls-it-art/</H3>Edited by: Don Wassall
<H3>Jewess Student, Aliza Shvarts, of Yale, artificially inseminates herself multiple times and aborts fetuses and calls it art</H3>
Posted by Europe on Jan 26, 2010 | 24 Comments
<DIV ="entry">
<DIV style="WIDTH: 295px" ="wp-caption alignright">
Yale Jewess Student, Aliza Shvarts
I guess the point is, it's better to be a Jewess that engages in degenerate and sick acts, and calls them art, by artificially inseminating herself over and over again, over nine months, and then aborts the fetuses that resulted over and over than to be a White male or a racist. That's the message I get out of this publicity stunt anyway. It's interesting that a Yale student can do this and the faculty and administration say nothing, but oh my God, let a Yale student pass out a few flyers calling attention to the fact that the entire media apparatus is in the hands of ethnic Jews, and they'd calling for an inquisition.
If you'd like to contact the student Aliza Shvarts, here's her email address. Why don't you ask her who she thinks is worse, a racially conscious White person or a murdering Jewess. aliza.shvarts@yale.edu
Art major Aliza Shvarts ‘08 wants to make a statement.
Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself "as often as possible"Â while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.
The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts' project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock â€" saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.
But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for "shock value."Â [Sure]
"I hope it inspires some sort of discourse,"Â Shvarts said. "Sure, some people will be upset with the message and will not agree with it, but it's not the intention of the piece to scandalize anyone."Â ["Some people" implies not very many, implying it isn't that big of a deal]
The "fabricators,"Â or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but Shvarts required them to periodically take tests for sexually transmitted diseases. She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body. The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said, and she did not feel the need to consult a doctor about her repeated miscarriages.
Shvarts declined to specify the number of sperm donors she used, as well as the number of times she inseminated herself.
Art major Juan Castillo ‘08 said that although he was intrigued by the
creativity and beauty of her senior project, not everyone was as thrilled as he was by the concept and the means by which she attained the result. [Murder is apparently "creative" and "beautiful." Imagine that?]
"I really loved the idea of this project, but a lot other people didn?t,"Â Castillo said. "I think that most people were very resistant to thinking about what the project was really about. [The senior-art-project forum] stopped being a conversation on the work itself."Â
Although Shvarts said she does not remember the class being quite as hostile as Castillo described, she said she believes it is the nature of her piece to"Âprovoke inquiry."Â
"I believe strongly that art should be a medium for politics and ideologies, not just a commodity,"Â Shvarts said. "I think that I'm creating a project that lives up to the standard of what art is supposed to be."Â
The display of Schvarts' project will feature a large cube suspended from the ceiling of a room in the gallery of Green Hall. Schvarts will wrap hundreds of feet of plastic sheeting around this cube; lined between layers of the sheeting will be the blood from Schvarts' self-induced miscarriages mixed with Vaseline in order to prevent the blood from drying and to extend the blood throughout the plastic sheeting. [Isn't that special?]
Schvarts will then project recorded videos onto the four sides of the cube. These videos, captured on a VHS camcorder, will show her experiencing miscarriages in her bathrooom tub, she said. Similar videos will be projected onto the walls of the room.
School of Art lecturer Pia Lindman [Also Jewish], Schvarts' senior-project advisor, could not be reached for comment Wednesday night.
Few people outside of Yale's undergraduate art department have heard about Shvarts' exhibition. Members of two campus abortion-activist groups â€" Choose Life at Yale, a pro-life group, and the Reproductive Rights Action League of Yale, a pro-choice group â€" said they were not previously aware of Schvarts' project.
Alice Buttrick ‘10, an officer of RALY, said the group was in no way involved with the art exhibition and had no official opinion on the matter.
Sara Rahman [A Muslim, but don't expect anyone to tell you. Muslims aren't nearly as corrupt as are western women.] ‘09 said, in her opinion, Shvarts is abusing her constitutional right to do what she chooses with her body.
"[Shvarts' exhibit] turns what is a serious decision for women into an absurdism,"Â Rahman said. "It discounts the gravity of the situation that is abortion."Â
CLAY member Jonathan Serrato ‘09 said he does not think CLAY has an official response to Schvarts' exhibition. But personally, Serrato said he found the concept of the senior art project "surprising" and unethical. [A wonder why he didn't use the term "shocking?" Possibly because the term "shocking" tends to belong to Jews exclusively. I'm thinking only Jews can be "shocked."].
"I feel that she's manipulating life for the benefit of her art, and I definitely don't support it,"Â Serrato said. "I think it's morally wrong."Â
Shvarts emphasized that she is not ashamed of her exhibition, and she has become increasingly comfortable discussing her miscarriage experiences with her peers. [It comes as no surprise to me she doesn't feel badly. If you send her an email don't bother telling her what she did is wrong, she'll never "get it," just tell her you know she's Jewish and you intend to point that out to as many people as you possibly can].
"It was a private and personal endeavor, but also a transparent one for the most part,"Â Shvarts said. "This isn't something I've been hiding."Â
The official reception for the Undergraduate Senior Art Show will be from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on April 25. The exhibition will be on public display from April 22 to May 1. The art exhibition is set to premiere alongside the projects of other art seniors this Tuesday, April 22 at the gallery of Holcombe T. Green Jr. Hall on Chapel Street.
Yale is calling it "fiction"Â but her claims and behavior is demented. Whether or not the blood used was real, she has produced art depicting blood from fetuses and video. She left out the body parts obviously, but the 'schtick' is real.
"The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman's body,"Â said Helaine S. Klasky, associate dean and vice president for public affairs at Yale. "Ms. Shvarts is engaged in performance art. Her art project includes visual representations, a press release and other narrative materials."Â
"She is an artist and has the right to express herself through performance art,"Â Klasky said in the statement.
The stomach-turning display will be showcased next week â€" complete with depictions of blood samples and videos purportedly from the terminated pregnancies.
This Jewess @ Yale is featured in an ‘Art Exhibit' â€" Fact
Her ‘Art' will be supposed aborted fetus â€" Fact
She alleges she impregnated herself â€" Fact
Now whether or not she had an abortion, is besides the point.
She is parading a sickness, that of Jew sponsored Infanticide (Ritual Baby Slaughter) upon Christian America, and making a mockery of the dead in so doing. And is calling it "Art"Â"¦
And she says: "I believe art should be a medium for politics and ideologies, not just a commodity."Â This person cannot even PROJECT any other motivational human force behind creative acts such as "art"Â.
So for those who doubt"¦ maybe you should go to her art exhibit, the date was provided, take some photos and report back, of all that you supposedly "didn't" see at this "fake" story.
<DIV ="entry">
<H3>http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/jewess-student-aliza-shvarts-of-yale-artificially-inseminates-herself-multiple-times-and-aborts-fetuses-and-calls-it-art/</H3>Edited by: Don Wassall
