Colonel_Reb
Hall of Famer
Another great example of the insane double standards that exist thanks to cultural Marxism and political correctness. From the blog of James Edwards.http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org...-carlton-hotel-bans-racist-family-from-hotel/
Here's the latest frivilous lawsuit from the country that used to be
America. Apparently, it's now a "civil rights"Â violation if <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20003255-504083.html" target="_blank">a
family chooses not to be waited on by "minorities"Â.</a>
<blockquote>
FORT MYERS, Fla. (CBS/AP) Naples Ritz-Carlton waiter
Wadner Tranchant is suing the hotel and one of its managers for
allegedly accommodating a family who requested they not be helped by
minorities or staff with accents.
Tranchant, a 40-year-old Haitian-born U.S. citizen, says supervisors
prevented him from serving the family during their lengthy stay last
month.
He claims the hotel's compliance with the request created a hostile
and abusive work environment.
Tranchant's lawyers filed the lawsuit last Tuesday in Florida's
Middle District of U.S. Court in Fort Myers and seek damages exceeding
$75,000.
A spokesman says the family isn't welcome to return, and the hotel
has policies preventing discrimination and harassment.
Tranchant is still working at the Ritz-Carlton.</blockquote>
Let me get this straight. First, the hotel makes the right decision
and respects the family's simple request. Then, after the minority
malcontent files an absurd lawsuit, the hotel sings a different tune and
says the family isn't welcome to return as guests.
So, it's "discrimination"Â if the hotel chooses to cater to its
guests, but it's NOT discrimination to ban guests from renting a room
for the night.
Hmmm. Yep, that makes since"¦if you live in Martin Luther King's
Diversity Wonderland.
Any sensible person would admit that it shouldn't be punishable to
have a preference in those with whom you choose to associate. Whether
the family had cause, or no cause at all, when making their request is
moot.
As perverted as this country has become, the waiter who had his
feelings hurt because he couldn't serve white customers will probably
win his silly lawsuit and end up owning the hotel.
Of course, I'm sure it would have been perfectly understandable if
this situation was reversed and a black family had chosen not to be
served by whites. Cultural Marxism, folks. Nobody said it had to be
consistent. It's only consistency is that it's anti-white, all the
time.
Here's the latest frivilous lawsuit from the country that used to be
America. Apparently, it's now a "civil rights"Â violation if <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20003255-504083.html" target="_blank">a
family chooses not to be waited on by "minorities"Â.</a>
<blockquote>
FORT MYERS, Fla. (CBS/AP) Naples Ritz-Carlton waiter
Wadner Tranchant is suing the hotel and one of its managers for
allegedly accommodating a family who requested they not be helped by
minorities or staff with accents.
Tranchant, a 40-year-old Haitian-born U.S. citizen, says supervisors
prevented him from serving the family during their lengthy stay last
month.
He claims the hotel's compliance with the request created a hostile
and abusive work environment.
Tranchant's lawyers filed the lawsuit last Tuesday in Florida's
Middle District of U.S. Court in Fort Myers and seek damages exceeding
$75,000.
A spokesman says the family isn't welcome to return, and the hotel
has policies preventing discrimination and harassment.
Tranchant is still working at the Ritz-Carlton.</blockquote>
Let me get this straight. First, the hotel makes the right decision
and respects the family's simple request. Then, after the minority
malcontent files an absurd lawsuit, the hotel sings a different tune and
says the family isn't welcome to return as guests.
So, it's "discrimination"Â if the hotel chooses to cater to its
guests, but it's NOT discrimination to ban guests from renting a room
for the night.
Hmmm. Yep, that makes since"¦if you live in Martin Luther King's
Diversity Wonderland.
Any sensible person would admit that it shouldn't be punishable to
have a preference in those with whom you choose to associate. Whether
the family had cause, or no cause at all, when making their request is
moot.
As perverted as this country has become, the waiter who had his
feelings hurt because he couldn't serve white customers will probably
win his silly lawsuit and end up owning the hotel.
Of course, I'm sure it would have been perfectly understandable if
this situation was reversed and a black family had chosen not to be
served by whites. Cultural Marxism, folks. Nobody said it had to be
consistent. It's only consistency is that it's anti-white, all the
time.
